Started By
Message

re: Why are some of you rooting for cities to burn?

Posted on 4/20/21 at 12:04 pm to
Posted by Tiguar
Montana
Member since Mar 2012
33131 posts
Posted on 4/20/21 at 12:04 pm to
Scruffy is simply telling you to get better at risk/benefit analysis.

You made a choice that the negatives you perceived were outweighed by the benefits.

Scruffy is coming from a place of medicine where those sorts of decisions are made every day and you bear responsibility for the negatives of therapy regardless of whether you like them or not.

You chose to support a side that detests our rule of law. You decided that was not so bad and you could deal with it. You own it.
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
74925 posts
Posted on 4/20/21 at 12:05 pm to
quote:

I would agree with this but Scruffy's argument goes much further than this. He argues that you are responsible for any and all actions that politician makes while in office, unforeseen or otherwise.
Ultimately, you are.

If you want to argue degrees of responsibility, that’s fine and I won’t disagree, but ultimately you bear at least some responsibility for putting the politician in the position of power in the first place.
Posted by SOSFAN
Blythewood
Member since Jun 2018
14269 posts
Posted on 4/20/21 at 12:05 pm to
I'm personally rooting for blue cities to burn to help carry me through the off-season. It's selfish but honest.
Posted by cahoots
Member since Jan 2009
9134 posts
Posted on 4/20/21 at 12:06 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 4/20/21 at 12:25 pm
Posted by SCLibertarian
Conway, South Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
39752 posts
Posted on 4/20/21 at 12:07 pm to
quote:

He argues that you are responsible for any and all actions that politician makes while in office, unforeseen or otherwise. 

3,000 Americans died on 9/11 because of our government's meddling in Middle Eastern foreign policy for a half century, and I doubt if 10% of the country could've told you what was going on in the decades leading to 9/11. But we were made to pay because of those we elected.
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
85096 posts
Posted on 4/20/21 at 12:08 pm to
quote:

Scruffy is coming from a place of medicine where those sorts of decisions are made every day and you bear responsibility for the negatives of therapy regardless of whether you like them or not.


Cool.

I literally do risk assessments everyday, as that is my job.

quote:

You chose to support a side that detests our rule of law. You decided that was not so bad and you could deal with it. You own it.


What side is that?
Posted by SCLibertarian
Conway, South Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
39752 posts
Posted on 4/20/21 at 12:10 pm to
quote:

The house literally passed a bill designed to end qualified immunity


Let me know when it passes the Senate and is signed into law. You and I both know that won't happen, because this entire ordeal has nothing to do with ending police militarization.
Posted by Freauxzen
Washington
Member since Feb 2006
38014 posts
Posted on 4/20/21 at 12:10 pm to
quote:

this is the exact reason why I have checked out of national politics and have focused my energy on local elections



And that's fair. And I hope your efforts are focused on getting local power back. That's the key. But we do have 2 amalgamations who are only concerned with growing their power, and that is hard to beat or tangle with.



For me, I think it's best to tangle with Republicans, there is a better chance to focus on local power, and a decreased centralization with Repubs in charge. So nationally, I vote for them, agree with most of the platform, but accept there are lots of problems in there as well and I accept that I am responsible for those things I disagree with (like capital punishment).

Modern democrats are all about ending local experiments, consolidating power, and controlling reality through cultural mechanisms. They are the main threat to individual liberty right now. Not sure that can be debated.
This post was edited on 4/20/21 at 12:15 pm
Posted by northshorebamaman
Cochise County AZ
Member since Jul 2009
36364 posts
Posted on 4/20/21 at 12:14 pm to
quote:


I mean, basically you are. In the stark difference of the idea above its clear. You might not be AS responsible for other things, but you are responsible.
OK. We are actually using the word differently. You are using it in the strictest sense of the word and I mean it to be used interchangeably with 'blame'. To be fair most people ITT seem to be using my definition.

For example, W Bush: I was partly responsible for the Iraq war in the strictest sense because it most likely wouldn't have happened had someone else been in office but I don't think it's fair to say I share "blame" for the war in Iraq because of who I voted for pre 9/11.

I also don't think your use of the word is particularly germane as it has nothing to do with justifying ROOTING for American cities to burn which people (not you) keep trying to pretend is not the topic.
Posted by cahoots
Member since Jan 2009
9134 posts
Posted on 4/20/21 at 12:15 pm to
This post was edited on 4/20/21 at 12:26 pm
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
57987 posts
Posted on 4/20/21 at 12:27 pm to
quote:

Not everyone can do that so simply.


Of course they can. Living in a dangerous situation is worse than packing up and moving. Every time. If you choose to stay, you did it to yourself.
This post was edited on 4/20/21 at 1:20 pm
Posted by Freauxzen
Washington
Member since Feb 2006
38014 posts
Posted on 4/20/21 at 12:30 pm to
quote:

Not everyone can do that so simply.


We exist on a planet that expanded simply because people moved from one place to another. I never get this argument honestly.

If we didn't move as humans, not sure we would still be here.

Let's articulate the real problem, people would have to sacrifice to move, which means affecting their level of comfort in some way. We are obsessed with comfort, and its ruined us and our ability to be free and make good choices.
This post was edited on 4/20/21 at 12:38 pm
Posted by pochejp
Gonzales, Louisiana
Member since Jan 2007
7941 posts
Posted on 4/20/21 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

What about the people who didn’t vote for it? What about the people who just want to peacefully live their lives?


They should move.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112428 posts
Posted on 4/20/21 at 12:42 pm to
quote:

Why are some of you rooting for cities to burn?
quote:

I'm personally rooting for blue cities to burn to help carry me through the off-season. It's selfish but honest.
I may not agree, but you're one of the few that actually gave a direct answer to the question that at least made some kind of sense.
This post was edited on 4/20/21 at 12:42 pm
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
281857 posts
Posted on 4/20/21 at 12:44 pm to
quote:

They should move.


Absolutely.

Go to the burbs.
Posted by Dennis Celery
Member since Apr 2021
708 posts
Posted on 4/20/21 at 1:08 pm to
quote:

A lot of the people that live in these cities did not ask for it. Innocent people and businesses could be destroyed and some of you cheer it on? Just for your entertainment? Be better than that


Those innocents could put a stop to it quickly if they really want to.
Posted by EarlyCuyler3
Appalachia
Member since Nov 2017
27290 posts
Posted on 4/20/21 at 1:14 pm to
quote:

for putting the politician in the position of power in the first place.




Didn't this last election finally open some eyes to the fact that your vote means absolutely nothing?
Posted by Klark Kent
Houston via BR
Member since Jan 2008
69632 posts
Posted on 4/20/21 at 1:15 pm to
OP never answered my question: what website did you link our responses to?
Posted by Nado Jenkins83
Land of the Free
Member since Nov 2012
62807 posts
Posted on 4/20/21 at 1:21 pm to
You know
Posted by Freauxzen
Washington
Member since Feb 2006
38014 posts
Posted on 4/20/21 at 1:31 pm to
quote:

OK. We are actually using the word differently. You are using it in the strictest sense of the word and I mean it to be used interchangeably with 'blame'. To be fair most people ITT seem to be using my definition.


I mean, we can split hairs, but blame involves responsibility. but this....

quote:

For example, W Bush: I was partly responsible for the Iraq war in the strictest sense because it most likely wouldn't have happened had someone else been in office but I don't think it's fair to say I share "blame" for the war in Iraq because of who I voted for pre 9/11.


is where complexity comes in. this required an event to happen that hadn't happened when you made your choice. it's something that may reduce your responsibility, or blame, but it doesn't delete it automatically. it's still there, but definitely less.

Republicans ( and I am/was a part of that) knowingly powered the Neocon machine for decades, of which W was a product and head of. They share some blame for the war mongering that occurred. We all know what any war in the middle east is about.

quote:

I also don't think your use of the word is particularly germane as it has nothing to do with justifying ROOTING for American cities to burn which people (not you) keep trying to pretend is not the topic.



True.

It does in the sense that, people are rooting for other people to see the results of their choices. It's an unsympathetic stance for sure, but it's rooted in the idea of reaping what you sow.

Personally, I don't root for those cities to burn, but i understand why they do and understand i can do nothing to stop but continue to espouse what I believe is a better/correct way. If people don't change, and don't take different actions, there isn't much we can do but watch at this point.
Jump to page
Page First 12 13 14 15 16
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 14 of 16Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram