- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why are interracial couples so over represented on TV?
Posted on 9/9/18 at 1:30 pm to Eli Goldfinger
Posted on 9/9/18 at 1:30 pm to Eli Goldfinger
We have discussed this a thousand times on this board. Interracial couples are assumed in our Progressive media culture to be somehow more evolved, more socially conscious, even more virtuous than plain old white people doing plain old white people things.
Now , on the average, since we have more and more blended families, I suppose it's good that those who live in racial enclaves of one kind or another understand that the country is changing, and that everybody does not look just like them.
Now , on the average, since we have more and more blended families, I suppose it's good that those who live in racial enclaves of one kind or another understand that the country is changing, and that everybody does not look just like them.
2
Posted on 9/9/18 at 1:34 pm to brgfather129
quote:
I only watch CMT, Fox News, and NASCAR... don't have to worry about none of that interracial shite being in my face
It probably will be if you walk into your daughter's room without knocking.
Posted on 9/9/18 at 1:50 pm to Lsupimp
quote:
understand that the country is changing, and that everybody does not look just like them.
This is why we elected Hillary in 2016! Take that racists!
Posted on 9/9/18 at 1:51 pm to Lsupimp
Posted on 9/9/18 at 2:03 pm to fr33manator
Progressivism has it's orthodoxies. "Multiculturalism" is a primary one. So they aren't likely to enjoy your illustration, or even understand it.
Posted on 9/9/18 at 2:21 pm to el Gaucho
quote:
This is why we elected Hillary in 2016! Take that racists!
Seriously?
Go into any large Metropolitan city and you'll see some mixed couples or groups of friends of different backgrounds having fun. That's the present and the future.
Presidential elections are never fully representative in a republic. Some people dont vote because the their state has a dominant party (a Democrat in Texas or a Republican in New York)
Others dont simply because the party they use to support no longer supports them (I've heard Dems and GOP complain about this).
Add Gerrymandering in and some people are always left out.
Look I'm sorry (not sorry) but the 1950s arent ever coming back. I find it sad that people who live in small backwater towns think they have control over anyone. People migrate out of their small towns for better opportunities all the time. Not everyone, but enough that its noticeable.
You could always offer better economic options. But more likely you'll just yearn for days gone by.
This post was edited on 9/9/18 at 2:22 pm
Posted on 9/9/18 at 2:34 pm to volod
So much goes right over your head. You really have much to learn. I say this respectfully.
Posted on 9/9/18 at 2:36 pm to fr33manator
quote:
More whites get killed by cops, despite blacks commuting a disproportionate number of violent crimes.
I’m not a boot licker and I’m against the militarization of the police state, but every time people riot over some dead, violent thug, it gives further justification for that same police state.
This is my main gripe with BLM. The entire country was beginning to discuss police militarization and overly aggressive tactics and BLM came in and intentionally made it racially divisive. Despite the fact that more whites are killed by police in both real and per capita numbers. That conversation is dead now. Kind of makes you wonder about the true motives of that "movement" and who was actually behind it.
Posted on 9/9/18 at 2:49 pm to Lsupimp
quote:
much goes right over your head. You really have much to learn. I say this respectfully
Go ahead and say what I'm wrong about. I'm open to criticism.
I firmly believe in what I said regarding the "winner take all" electoral college. Never said it was bad, but it's not fully representative.
Unless you're referring to the fact Trump's wife is Russian descent. I've got no issue with that.
Posted on 9/9/18 at 2:55 pm to volod
quote:
Unless you're referring to the fact Trump's wife is Russian descent.
She’s from Slovenia.
You are a moron sometimes
Posted on 9/9/18 at 3:04 pm to volod
quote:
This is why we elected Hillary in 2016! Take that racists!
You misunderstood his point in saying this. And then you revert to the worn-out slander about it "not being the 50's anymore" as if that is anything other than cynical political strategy aimed at Conservative whites. Which it is. White conservative Americans in my humble opinion are the least race-aware and least race-obsessed people on planet earth . And equating a WISE desire to preserve our best American traditions, principles and ideals ( FOR ALL PEOPLE) with the false Marxist deconstruction that whites want to oppress their swarthy neighbors is just laughable.
That said, I know you write on this site in good faith and that you aren't a hateful race warrior dude.
Posted on 9/9/18 at 3:06 pm to fr33manator
quote:
She’s from Slovenia.
Well, I think they're Slavs, which is pretty much what Russians are traditionally.
Posted on 9/9/18 at 3:24 pm to upgrayedd
Well if that’s the case then everyone in the balkans is Russian
Posted on 9/9/18 at 3:27 pm to fr33manator
quote:
She’s from Slovenia.
I was incorrect. As another poster stated, she is of Slavic descent so my first impression was that perhaps her family migrated from Russia to Slovenia.
But I stand corrected.
Posted on 9/9/18 at 3:35 pm to fr33manator
quote:
Well if that’s the case then everyone in the balkans is Russian
Vlad is certainly trying to make it that way
Posted on 9/9/18 at 3:49 pm to Lsupimp
quote:
White conservative Americans in my humble opinion are the least race-aware and least race-obsessed people on planet earth . And equating a WISE desire to preserve our best American traditions, principles and ideals ( FOR ALL PEOPLE) with the false Marxist deconstruction that whites want to oppress their swarthy neighbors is just laughable.
I understand what your position is, but it raises a few questions.
What are traditional American values? This isn't to be pedantic, it's a legitimate concern. The ideology of the traditional nuclear family is already eroding. Even our President has had a divorce (not character assassination, simply pointing out how acceptable Reformed families have become since Reagan).
And the biggest tradeoff we've made is that were the biggest capitalists in the world. Which has also lead to this consumerism culture that has become unrestrained. It's made people more susceptible to these mass media influences like Hollywood.
The instant gratification and narcissism portrayed in social media doesn't mesh well with the semi biblical founding tenants of the US.
The US doesn't have a budget problem, but it does have a spending problem. American values are shifting.
For what it's worth, I'm not a fan of 4th wave feminism or transgenderism.
This post was edited on 9/9/18 at 3:50 pm
Posted on 9/9/18 at 4:14 pm to Eli Goldfinger
because Darwin
Posted on 9/9/18 at 4:41 pm to volod
quote:
I'm not a fan of 4th wave feminism or transgenderism.
Then you are a hateful bigot racist Nazi who has no place in the progressive world.
There’s still room on the train.
Posted on 9/9/18 at 5:57 pm to cj35
quote:
because Darwin
You guys bringing up Darwin and Eugenics is counterproductive. The fact of the matter is that Western countries have went against natural sexual order to maintain patriarchal societies. These societies evolved into what we have today.
The vast majority of western civilization has been about controlling who our daughters and sisters mate with. This was so that only men of good financial standing were rewarded with having a beautiful wife. Good Genes (what you all think they are) would always dominate in that environment.
But post sexual revolution this has been disbanded. The welfare state ensures that the poorest amoung us will usually have more kids with absent fathers (explain to me how this is fits your version of Darwinism ?)
Added to that, women are naturally more emotional and wont always pick men of the best intellectual or physical talents needed in a post industrialized society.
As one poster put it, our tax dollars are used to keep single moms at home.
This post was edited on 9/9/18 at 5:58 pm
Posted on 9/9/18 at 6:10 pm to volod
Ah. Getting downvoted when speaking the truth. Never change OT.
Page 9 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News