- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Who’s side you on? Neighbor threatens to sue bar over bubble machine
Posted on 5/20/25 at 2:00 pm to crash1211
Posted on 5/20/25 at 2:00 pm to crash1211
quote:
Desuetude, in legal terms, refers to the idea that laws can become unenforceable due to a long habit of non-enforcement or lapse of time, essentially becoming obsolete
Yep, another area the duration something has been occuring can come into play.
On the flip side of the coin, the duration within a given business day they do something could go the opposite way for them, when viewing how reasonable something may be. If they are running these machines non-stop the entire day, could definitely see a court ruling that would not be reasonable.
0
Posted on 5/20/25 at 2:01 pm to TackySweater
You didn't answer the question. It is okay, you can use chat GPT or something if you need assistance.
Posted on 5/20/25 at 2:02 pm to TackySweater
That bubble machine is a warning.
It lets all naive first time FQ Baws know what is about to happen. You are walking down Bourbon into another dimension. The rainbow flags should be a warning but when hammered eyes need to stay eye level at most so you don’t trip over something. The bubbles let you know that “something” may be a gay cock.
It lets all naive first time FQ Baws know what is about to happen. You are walking down Bourbon into another dimension. The rainbow flags should be a warning but when hammered eyes need to stay eye level at most so you don’t trip over something. The bubbles let you know that “something” may be a gay cock.
Posted on 5/20/25 at 2:03 pm to Fun Bunch
Waiting for rallying cry from bar owner
“First they take bubbles, then your guns!”
“First they take bubbles, then your guns!”
Posted on 5/20/25 at 2:03 pm to Akit1
quote:
Waiting for rallying cry from bar owner
“First they take bubbles, then your guns!”
Already trying to take their bubble guns.
"SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED"
Posted on 5/20/25 at 2:05 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
quote:
didn't answer the question. It is okay, you can use chat GPT or something if you need assistance.
Neither did you. But thanks for playing.
Posted on 5/20/25 at 2:10 pm to TackySweater
quote:
Neither did you. But thanks for playing.
quote:
TackySweater
I'd say the fact that you don't understand that nobody is arguing the point you are trying to make with that question is shocking, but with what you've shown so far is this thread, i'm not surprised.
This post was edited on 5/20/25 at 2:13 pm
Posted on 5/20/25 at 2:14 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
quote:
say the fact that you don't understand that nobody is arguing the point you are trying to make with that question is shocking, but with what you've shown so far is this thread, i'm not surprised.
ThE bUbBlE mAcHiNe HaS bEeN tHeRe fOr FIVE YEARS!!!
Posted on 5/20/25 at 2:15 pm to TackySweater
My first thought is "frick the VP". Do your due diligence in checking out the surrounding properties for potential issues before just jumping into something like a naive idiot.
Then I watched the video. The VP's words, mannerisms and the fact he refused all attempts at compromise tells me he's just a whiney bitch who is purposely trying to make a molehill into a mountain just so he can completely get his way (this was especially underscored when he fretted over the possibility that a bubble land in his drink - oh, the horrors!). This reinforced to me that my first thought was a good one.
Parking in the Frech Quarter is largely public. His knowingly and willingly parking there despite the continued bubbles shoots his argument in the foot as none of those parking spots are his property.
Soap and water aren't really known for harming paint jobs. He would have to prove the specific chemical makeup of the solution is causing harm to his vehicle. His case could be easier if other residents in the area have complained to/about the bar's bubbles on their vehicles and those claims went unanswered. If there have been no other complaints, it underscores his whiney bitchitude.
Louisiana's private nuisance laws (La. Civil Code Articles 667, 668 & 669) state that if the business’ actions unreasonably interfere with your property (a car, in this case), then the business may be liable for some/all of the cost of making you whole. However, there are some caveats for the business having prior knowledge of such problems (prior complaints) and/or the issue being hazardous in nature.
Bubbles drifting onto a public street might qualify as a nuisance (depending on the judge), but he's going to need to show significant harm, which is hard for non-damaging bubbles.
Then I watched the video. The VP's words, mannerisms and the fact he refused all attempts at compromise tells me he's just a whiney bitch who is purposely trying to make a molehill into a mountain just so he can completely get his way (this was especially underscored when he fretted over the possibility that a bubble land in his drink - oh, the horrors!). This reinforced to me that my first thought was a good one.
Parking in the Frech Quarter is largely public. His knowingly and willingly parking there despite the continued bubbles shoots his argument in the foot as none of those parking spots are his property.
Soap and water aren't really known for harming paint jobs. He would have to prove the specific chemical makeup of the solution is causing harm to his vehicle. His case could be easier if other residents in the area have complained to/about the bar's bubbles on their vehicles and those claims went unanswered. If there have been no other complaints, it underscores his whiney bitchitude.
Louisiana's private nuisance laws (La. Civil Code Articles 667, 668 & 669) state that if the business’ actions unreasonably interfere with your property (a car, in this case), then the business may be liable for some/all of the cost of making you whole. However, there are some caveats for the business having prior knowledge of such problems (prior complaints) and/or the issue being hazardous in nature.
Bubbles drifting onto a public street might qualify as a nuisance (depending on the judge), but he's going to need to show significant harm, which is hard for non-damaging bubbles.
Posted on 5/20/25 at 2:18 pm to nes2010
quote:
The bar owner said they offered to limit the times they ran the machine and wash the guys car for him regularly and he refused.
If this is true, I am firmly on team bubbles.
Posted on 5/20/25 at 2:20 pm to TackySweater
quote:
ThE bUbBlE mAcHiNe HaS bEeN tHeRe fOr FIVE YEARS!!!
Yes, that has been well established. Glad you're getting caught up now.
Posted on 5/20/25 at 2:28 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
This reminds me of when Sidney Torres moved next to Buffa's and then complained about loud noises at the bar he chose to move next door to.
Posted on 5/20/25 at 2:36 pm to JohnnyKilroy
quote:
This reminds me of when Sidney Torres moved next to Buffa's and then complained about loud noises at the bar he chose to move next door to.
He’s not complains about loud noises lol
Posted on 5/20/25 at 2:36 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
quote:
Yes, that has been well established. Glad you're getting caught up now.
Yep. Eventually it may have to be taken down. Guess we will see.
Posted on 5/20/25 at 2:37 pm to Bard
quote:
which is hard for non-damaging bubbles.
Oh?
Posted on 5/20/25 at 2:44 pm to notiger1997
quote:it looks just like them. They dress just as hippie, for event like this, as the real ones that live there.
Dumbass.
Those looked nothing like Metairie/Kenner folks.
Posted on 5/20/25 at 2:45 pm to TackySweater
Get a couple fans to blow away bubbles
This isnt that difficult
This isnt that difficult
Posted on 5/20/25 at 2:55 pm to TackySweater
quote:
Oh?
Yes. Part of his claim (at least in the interview) is to imply that the bar could be putting something other than soap and water into the mixture. He'll have to prove that it's more than common soap and water and then prove that the extra substances have caused significant damage to his vehicle, home and dainty little drink.
Posted on 5/20/25 at 2:58 pm to Bard
quote:
) is to imply that the bar could be putting something other than soap and water into the mixture
Are you saying that soap is not harmful to car paint?
Posted on 5/20/25 at 2:59 pm to CarRamrod
quote:
looks just like them. They dress just as hippie, for event like this, as the real ones that live there.
Page 10 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News