Started By
Message

re: Which one of these makes the better weapon?

Posted on 5/13/16 at 9:51 am to
Posted by Kcrad
Diamondhead
Member since Nov 2010
68366 posts
Posted on 5/13/16 at 9:51 am to
Pointed stick.


BTW: Is anyone in this thread old enough to understand my posts?
Posted by drewnbrla
The Pool is closed.
Member since Mar 2011
7839 posts
Posted on 5/13/16 at 9:52 am to
Tire Iron.
Posted by Scooba
Member since Jun 2013
20027 posts
Posted on 5/13/16 at 9:52 am to
quote:

Wrong. The belt would have the greatest range and be able to be wielded as a whip or a flail.


And what happens if I catch the belt? Your whip will more than likely not be life-threatening.
Posted by SabiDojo
Open to any suggestions.
Member since Nov 2010
84835 posts
Posted on 5/13/16 at 9:53 am to
Ball peen

/thread
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
74589 posts
Posted on 5/13/16 at 9:53 am to
quote:

Wrong. The belt would have the greatest range and be able to be wielded as a whip or a flail


But a belt is most likely not going to deliver a debilitating blow as quickly as a bat. Hit someone up side the head with a belt buckle and it's going to hurt. Hit someone upside the head with a bat and there a good chance you've just killed them or at least knocked them out cold.
This post was edited on 5/13/16 at 9:55 am
Posted by Kcrad
Diamondhead
Member since Nov 2010
68366 posts
Posted on 5/13/16 at 9:53 am to
quote:

On a side note, I saw someone take a pair of jeans, soak them in water and twist them up real tight and beat the ever loving shite out of someone with it. I was impressed with the weapon.




I will never forget that day. Revenge will be sweet.
Posted by FelicianaTigerfan
Comanche County
Member since Aug 2009
26059 posts
Posted on 5/13/16 at 9:53 am to
quote:

C) wooden baseball bat,


quote:

G) pants' belt with a solid buckle


Have about the same reach. A bat takes more effort to swing and generally uses both hands. You achieve same reach with a belt and striking speed of the buckle may be higher than that of a bat with a lot less effort. With the bat you have more solid surface are to use for striking and likely more accuracy.

Im pretty torn between the two but after typing it out id go with a bat
Posted by tigers32
Member since Mar 2012
5792 posts
Posted on 5/13/16 at 9:53 am to
Wooden bat
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
74589 posts
Posted on 5/13/16 at 9:53 am to
quote:

Ball peen

/thread


I've seen what that does. It's not pretty.
Posted by CadesCove
Mounting the Woman
Member since Oct 2006
40828 posts
Posted on 5/13/16 at 9:54 am to
quote:

And what happens if I catch the belt?


I think the belt/buckle would hurt like hell, but not do any incapacitating damage. Give me the blunt-force trauma weapons every time.
Posted by auggie
Opelika, Alabama
Member since Aug 2013
31940 posts
Posted on 5/13/16 at 9:54 am to
Dead blow hammer, it's called that for a reason.
Posted by Topwater Trout
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
70176 posts
Posted on 5/13/16 at 9:55 am to
Baseball bat
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
481186 posts
Posted on 5/13/16 at 9:55 am to
quote:

A) tire iron,

it's got weight, a slim design (to focus the force), and is the least likely to break

i see the allure of a hammer, but the tire iron has slightly more range and is much more dependable (esp if it's a wooden hammer)
Posted by SabiDojo
Open to any suggestions.
Member since Nov 2010
84835 posts
Posted on 5/13/16 at 9:56 am to
I'll go with tire iron because it's design allows for defensive positions as well as offensive positions.
Posted by bengalbait
Grove Lounge
Member since Sep 2009
4603 posts
Posted on 5/13/16 at 9:57 am to
Monty Python was the BOMB! Say no more, Say no more.
Posted by Theboot32
Mandeville/Poplarville
Member since Jan 2016
2454 posts
Posted on 5/13/16 at 9:57 am to
quote:

Hammer. You have a puncturing end and a blunt force end and it's weighted for maximized striking.


None of the others come close to having force modifiers equal to a standard framing hammer. And none of the others offer as much puncture wound power.

You'll make them bleed faster with the hammer.



not to mention you can throw the hammer, that shite would hurt
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
481186 posts
Posted on 5/13/16 at 9:57 am to
my #2 is probably the bat for range purposes, then the hammer

unless you fools are pootie tang, a belt is worthless
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
74589 posts
Posted on 5/13/16 at 9:57 am to
quote:

quote:
A) tire iron,

it's got weight, a slim design (to focus the force), and is the least likely to break

i see the allure of a hammer, but the tire iron has slightly more range and is much more dependable (esp if it's a wooden hammer)


Problem with a tire iron is its grip, or lack thereof. They're not designed to hold and swing like a weapon.

For that reason I'd choose a bat first and hammer second.
Posted by CMBears1259
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
5047 posts
Posted on 5/13/16 at 9:57 am to
Tire iron
Bat
Hammer

ETA: A piece of rubber hose (2 ft long) also makes a pretty nice weapon, although it certainly does not have as much deadly potential as the three listed.
This post was edited on 5/13/16 at 10:01 am
Posted by bourne1978
USA
Member since Aug 2015
305 posts
Posted on 5/13/16 at 9:58 am to
Good reason, but if we are talking to get close enough to the target without them realizing till it is too late. The answer is F. If I see you with a long bat, I will think to take off in the other direction. F is if you want a better chance at even getting shot. They'll just think you are drinking some soda. Stealthiness is key.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram