Started By
Message

re: What's happening in Africa?

Posted on 3/11/17 at 9:17 pm to
Posted by PoundFoolish
East Texas
Member since Jul 2016
3724 posts
Posted on 3/11/17 at 9:17 pm to
quote:

A white supremacist in a white supremacist thread. Go figure.


You're retarded.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
40038 posts
Posted on 3/11/17 at 9:22 pm to
quote:

This doesn't mean they share similar phenotype/genotype attributes.



Except there is a prevalence of the same Haplogroup, J-M267, in the area, including some Jewish populations, which indicates a degree of overlap.

LINK

quote:

Chiaroni 2009 proposed that J-P58 (that they refer to as J1e) might have first dispersed during the Pre-Pottery Neolithic B period, "from a geographical zone, including northeast Syria, northern Iraq and eastern Turkey toward Mediterranean Anatolia, Ismaili from southern Syria, Jordan, Palestine and northern Egypt." They further propose that the Zarzian material culture may be ancestral. They also propose that this movement of people may also be linked to the dispersal of Semitic languages by hunter-herders, who moved into arid areas during periods known to have had low rainfall. Thus, while other haplogroups including J-M267 moved out of the area with agriculturalists who followed the rainfall, populations carrying J-M267 remained with their flocks (King 2002 and Chiaroni 2008). According to this scenario, after the initial neolithic expansion involving Semitic languages, which possibly reached as far as Yemen, a more recent dispersal occurred during the Chalcolithic or Early Bronze Age (approximately 3000–5000 BCE), and this involved the branch of Semitic which leads to the Arabic language. The authors propose that this involved a spread of some J-P58 from the direction of Syria towards Arab populations of the Arabian Peninsula and Negev.
Posted by PoundFoolish
East Texas
Member since Jul 2016
3724 posts
Posted on 3/11/17 at 9:25 pm to
quote:

Except there is a prevalence of the same Haplogroup, J-M267, in the area, including some Jewish populations, which indicates a degree of overlap.



There's overlap between the caucasoid and semitic as well. LINK
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
40038 posts
Posted on 3/11/17 at 9:31 pm to
I never denied that. But if you read my link, you'd see the argument is about whether this overlap is due to the recent Arab expansion, or is a holdover from an original Neolithic expansion. The newer studies contend that this prevalence has an origin older than Arab expansion in the 700's.
Posted by Rockbrc
Attic
Member since Nov 2015
9927 posts
Posted on 3/11/17 at 9:32 pm to
UAPB class reunion
Posted by Easy
Los Angeles
Member since Dec 2008
5837 posts
Posted on 3/11/17 at 9:34 pm to


Jesus was white...

Arabs aren't white...

Pakistanis are Arab...

You're putting in work in this thread!
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
135028 posts
Posted on 3/11/17 at 9:56 pm to
Prior to being able to cross the Sahara, North African and Arabic peoples were mainly caucasoid.

Negroid Slaves from sub-Saharan Africa into the populations of these areas, particularly after the Muslim conquest (not to mention Mongoloid blood from invasions) Led to this area being much more mixed today.


Not hard to understand
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
40038 posts
Posted on 3/11/17 at 9:57 pm to
quote:

North African and Arabic peoples were mainly caucasoid.



That's not what the genetic data says.
Posted by StrongSafety
Member since Sep 2004
18000 posts
Posted on 3/11/17 at 10:01 pm to
quote:

For Afrocentrists, considerations of this nature cannot be applied.


No uoure acting as if the application of this has no merit.

It's that the Euros proceed to divide and conquer based on race and deemed themselves and their (lackof) melanin as the superior race of God.


All of which has been proven to have no bases and is jsut utterly false. However half the world is sadly brainwashed by it
Posted by StrongSafety
Member since Sep 2004
18000 posts
Posted on 3/11/17 at 10:02 pm to
quote:

Afrocentrists are nuts. They want to claim that Moses, Hannibal, Jesus, the ancient Egyptians and most everyone else of historical note as being black. it's all a giant cover up on the part of every historian over centuries to deny this.


It's not like historians has ever painted Africans in a great light --- look at what they've done -- see this thread

I'd put my 401k on it that Jesus looked closes to Chris brown than he looked like Matt Damon
Posted by PoundFoolish
East Texas
Member since Jul 2016
3724 posts
Posted on 3/11/17 at 10:04 pm to
quote:

That's not what the genetic data says.



Eugenics and selective breeding aside, the fact is that the semitic peoples share caucasoid characteristics. Jews today (especially Sephardic and Ashkenazi, the Northern tribes of Israel's descendants) share far more caucasian characteristics than Oriental/Asiatic peoples.
Posted by Bullfrog
Running Through the Wet Grass
Member since Jul 2010
61791 posts
Posted on 3/11/17 at 10:08 pm to
quote:

All of which has been proven to have no bases and is jsut utterly false. However half the world is sadly brainwashed by it
You're right. It's just the cultcha. Genetic predisposition is a nazi myth.
Posted by biglego
San Francisco
Member since Nov 2007
85514 posts
Posted on 3/11/17 at 10:13 pm to
quote:

I'd put my 401k on it that Jesus looked closes to Chris brown than he looked like Matt Damon

I'd put my 401k that he looked like neither. He would've looked like a Jew in ancient Palestine. Probably a lot like a Palestinian looks today.
Posted by PoundFoolish
East Texas
Member since Jul 2016
3724 posts
Posted on 3/11/17 at 10:17 pm to
quote:


All of which has been proven to have no bases and is jsut utterly false. However half the world is sadly brainwashed by it


Some nice valid justifications and proofs you have their for your broad claim. Just like another poster I know from the PT.
Posted by ByteMe
Member since Sep 2003
22360 posts
Posted on 3/11/17 at 10:45 pm to
quote:

StrongSafety


I don't understand why you were un-banned. You started off on this board talking shite about USC deserving the National Championship over LSU. All you do is stir up shite.
This post was edited on 3/12/17 at 3:18 am
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
40038 posts
Posted on 3/11/17 at 10:58 pm to
quote:

Eugenics and selective breeding aside, the fact is that the semitic peoples share caucasoid characteristics. Jews today (especially Sephardic and Ashkenazi, the Northern tribes of Israel's descendants) share far more caucasian characteristics than Oriental/Asiatic peoples.



Which is why Jews don't share Rb1 or other shared phenotypes. Some groups in the Caucasus region have a 99% over lap with the subgroup mentioned earlier.
Posted by dallastiger55
Jennings, LA
Member since Jan 2010
35064 posts
Posted on 3/11/17 at 11:00 pm to
Is that the black host on snl weekend update?
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
135028 posts
Posted on 3/11/17 at 11:03 pm to
quote:

That's not what the genetic data says.



That's what the past tense, "were" says.
Posted by Ed Osteen
Member since Oct 2007
59344 posts
Posted on 3/11/17 at 11:03 pm to
The frick is going on in this thread?
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
135028 posts
Posted on 3/11/17 at 11:05 pm to
quote:

The frick is going on in this thread?


Science and logic versus We Wuz Kangs
Jump to page
Page First 9 10 11 12 13 14
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 11 of 14Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram