- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 3/11/17 at 9:22 pm to PoundFoolish
quote:
This doesn't mean they share similar phenotype/genotype attributes.
Except there is a prevalence of the same Haplogroup, J-M267, in the area, including some Jewish populations, which indicates a degree of overlap.
LINK
quote:
Chiaroni 2009 proposed that J-P58 (that they refer to as J1e) might have first dispersed during the Pre-Pottery Neolithic B period, "from a geographical zone, including northeast Syria, northern Iraq and eastern Turkey toward Mediterranean Anatolia, Ismaili from southern Syria, Jordan, Palestine and northern Egypt." They further propose that the Zarzian material culture may be ancestral. They also propose that this movement of people may also be linked to the dispersal of Semitic languages by hunter-herders, who moved into arid areas during periods known to have had low rainfall. Thus, while other haplogroups including J-M267 moved out of the area with agriculturalists who followed the rainfall, populations carrying J-M267 remained with their flocks (King 2002 and Chiaroni 2008). According to this scenario, after the initial neolithic expansion involving Semitic languages, which possibly reached as far as Yemen, a more recent dispersal occurred during the Chalcolithic or Early Bronze Age (approximately 3000–5000 BCE), and this involved the branch of Semitic which leads to the Arabic language. The authors propose that this involved a spread of some J-P58 from the direction of Syria towards Arab populations of the Arabian Peninsula and Negev.
Posted on 3/11/17 at 9:31 pm to PoundFoolish
I never denied that. But if you read my link, you'd see the argument is about whether this overlap is due to the recent Arab expansion, or is a holdover from an original Neolithic expansion. The newer studies contend that this prevalence has an origin older than Arab expansion in the 700's.
Posted on 3/11/17 at 9:34 pm to PoundFoolish
Jesus was white...
Arabs aren't white...
Pakistanis are Arab...
You're putting in work in this thread!
Posted on 3/11/17 at 9:56 pm to Easy
Prior to being able to cross the Sahara, North African and Arabic peoples were mainly caucasoid.
Negroid Slaves from sub-Saharan Africa into the populations of these areas, particularly after the Muslim conquest (not to mention Mongoloid blood from invasions) Led to this area being much more mixed today.
Not hard to understand
Negroid Slaves from sub-Saharan Africa into the populations of these areas, particularly after the Muslim conquest (not to mention Mongoloid blood from invasions) Led to this area being much more mixed today.
Not hard to understand
Posted on 3/11/17 at 9:57 pm to fr33manator
quote:
North African and Arabic peoples were mainly caucasoid.
That's not what the genetic data says.
Posted on 3/11/17 at 10:01 pm to PoundFoolish
quote:
For Afrocentrists, considerations of this nature cannot be applied.
No uoure acting as if the application of this has no merit.
It's that the Euros proceed to divide and conquer based on race and deemed themselves and their (lackof) melanin as the superior race of God.
All of which has been proven to have no bases and is jsut utterly false. However half the world is sadly brainwashed by it
Posted on 3/11/17 at 10:02 pm to biglego
quote:
Afrocentrists are nuts. They want to claim that Moses, Hannibal, Jesus, the ancient Egyptians and most everyone else of historical note as being black. it's all a giant cover up on the part of every historian over centuries to deny this.
It's not like historians has ever painted Africans in a great light --- look at what they've done -- see this thread
I'd put my 401k on it that Jesus looked closes to Chris brown than he looked like Matt Damon
Posted on 3/11/17 at 10:04 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
That's not what the genetic data says.
Eugenics and selective breeding aside, the fact is that the semitic peoples share caucasoid characteristics. Jews today (especially Sephardic and Ashkenazi, the Northern tribes of Israel's descendants) share far more caucasian characteristics than Oriental/Asiatic peoples.
Posted on 3/11/17 at 10:08 pm to StrongSafety
quote:You're right. It's just the cultcha. Genetic predisposition is a nazi myth.
All of which has been proven to have no bases and is jsut utterly false. However half the world is sadly brainwashed by it
Posted on 3/11/17 at 10:13 pm to StrongSafety
quote:
I'd put my 401k on it that Jesus looked closes to Chris brown than he looked like Matt Damon
I'd put my 401k that he looked like neither. He would've looked like a Jew in ancient Palestine. Probably a lot like a Palestinian looks today.
Posted on 3/11/17 at 10:17 pm to StrongSafety
quote:
All of which has been proven to have no bases and is jsut utterly false. However half the world is sadly brainwashed by it
Some nice valid justifications and proofs you have their for your broad claim. Just like another poster I know from the PT.
Posted on 3/11/17 at 10:45 pm to StrongSafety
quote:
StrongSafety
I don't understand why you were un-banned. You started off on this board talking shite about USC deserving the National Championship over LSU. All you do is stir up shite.
This post was edited on 3/12/17 at 3:18 am
Posted on 3/11/17 at 10:58 pm to PoundFoolish
quote:
Eugenics and selective breeding aside, the fact is that the semitic peoples share caucasoid characteristics. Jews today (especially Sephardic and Ashkenazi, the Northern tribes of Israel's descendants) share far more caucasian characteristics than Oriental/Asiatic peoples.
Which is why Jews don't share Rb1 or other shared phenotypes. Some groups in the Caucasus region have a 99% over lap with the subgroup mentioned earlier.
Posted on 3/11/17 at 11:00 pm to Brosef Stalin
Is that the black host on snl weekend update?
Posted on 3/11/17 at 11:03 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
That's not what the genetic data says.
That's what the past tense, "were" says.
Posted on 3/11/17 at 11:03 pm to crazy4lsu
The frick is going on in this thread?
Posted on 3/11/17 at 11:05 pm to Ed Osteen
quote:
The frick is going on in this thread?
Science and logic versus We Wuz Kangs
Popular
Back to top


1





