Started By
Message

What would it take for America to get better railway service?

Posted on 8/28/22 at 2:50 pm
Posted by Alaskan Igloo
New Orleans, LA
Member since Aug 2022
22 posts
Posted on 8/28/22 at 2:50 pm
Like in Europe you can get anywhere under 2 hours max by train.

Chicago to NOLA? That's 8+ via Amtrak

How did America get so car Dependant?
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
64652 posts
Posted on 8/28/22 at 2:52 pm to
Organic need and demand, neither of which is there on a scale that necessitates better railway service.

I’m sorry, that’s the truth.
Posted by Smeg
Member since Aug 2018
9342 posts
Posted on 8/28/22 at 2:52 pm to
Why would we want that?
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
28710 posts
Posted on 8/28/22 at 2:53 pm to
quote:

What would it take for America to get better railway service?
A lot of money.
quote:

Like in Europe you can get anywhere under 2 hours max by train.
Yeah Europe is small.
quote:

How did America get so car Dependant?
A combination of self-reliance, convenience, geographic scale, and cost.
Posted by Bawwitdabaw
Member since Dec 2020
546 posts
Posted on 8/28/22 at 2:53 pm to
Cars>trains. I don’t have to deal or interact with anyone In my car. Plus I can stop and pick up hooker(s) anytime. Can’t do that on a train baw.
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
73681 posts
Posted on 8/28/22 at 2:54 pm to
quote:

Like in Europe you can get anywhere under 2 hours max by train.


Kind of a myth. It is much better than America though.
Posted by BobABooey
Parts Unknown
Member since Oct 2004
14296 posts
Posted on 8/28/22 at 2:54 pm to
quote:

in Europe you can get anywhere under 2 hours

Posted by SuperSaint
Sorting Out OT BS Since '2007'
Member since Sep 2007
140462 posts
Posted on 8/28/22 at 2:54 pm to
quote:

Like in Europe you can get anywhere under 2 hours max by train

No you can’t

quote:

Alaskan Igloo
have you ever ventured outside of your igloo?
Posted by dbeck
Member since Nov 2014
29453 posts
Posted on 8/28/22 at 2:54 pm to
quote:

Chicago to NOLA? That's 8+ via Amtrak

Amtrak is just trying to extend the life of their customers in that scenario.

quote:

Like in Europe you can get anywhere under 2 hours max by train.


Paris to Avignon is close to 3 hours and that's on the TGV that runs 300 mph.
This post was edited on 8/28/22 at 2:55 pm
Posted by Hangover Haven
Metry
Member since Oct 2013
26636 posts
Posted on 8/28/22 at 2:54 pm to
Posted by LSUGrrrl
Frisco, TX
Member since Jul 2007
33052 posts
Posted on 8/28/22 at 2:55 pm to
Get rid of derelicts and bums. No way I take public transport as we are today.
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
73681 posts
Posted on 8/28/22 at 2:56 pm to
quote:

No way I take public transport as we are today.



Amtrak isn't public transportation.
Posted by LSUFreek
Greater New Orleans
Member since Jan 2007
14780 posts
Posted on 8/28/22 at 2:58 pm to
There's a ton of videos/mini-docs on the shitshow in California trying to build that supersonic bullet-train from LA to SF. So many red-tape & property roadblocks that it's practically dead on arrival, with only a short portion built. And I think it was Musk's vision to build it.
Posted by NotoriousFSU
Atlanta, GA
Member since Oct 2008
10234 posts
Posted on 8/28/22 at 2:59 pm to
quote:

How did America get so car Dependant?


Chinese immigrant manual labor declined.

quote:

What would it take for America to get better railway service?


$80 Billion to Ukraine.
Posted by Rekrul
Member since Feb 2007
7958 posts
Posted on 8/28/22 at 3:01 pm to
quote:

Amtrak isn't public transportation.


Sure it is, it’s owned by the fkn federal government
Posted by chinhoyang
Member since Jun 2011
23519 posts
Posted on 8/28/22 at 3:04 pm to
quote:

Like in Europe you can get anywhere under 2 hours max by train.


This statement is incredibly inaccurate.
Posted by Larry_Hotdogs
Texas
Member since Jun 2019
1339 posts
Posted on 8/28/22 at 3:05 pm to
quote:

Amtrak isn't public transportation.


quote:

Founded in 1971 as a quasi-public corporation to operate many U.S. passenger rail routes,[1][2][4] Amtrak receives a combination of state and federal subsidies but is managed as a for-profit organization.[3] The United States federal government through the Secretary of Transportation owns all the company's issued and outstanding preferred stock.[5] Amtrak's headquarters is located one block west of Union Station in Washington, D.C.[6]


Mayor Pete is on the board as the Sec of Transportation. It’s pretty public even though it’s managed as a for-profit outfit.

Posted by chinhoyang
Member since Jun 2011
23519 posts
Posted on 8/28/22 at 3:05 pm to
The ACELA train NY to DC has done well, and attracts good customers.
Posted by LSUGrrrl
Frisco, TX
Member since Jul 2007
33052 posts
Posted on 8/28/22 at 3:07 pm to
quote:

Amtrak isn't public transportation.


Meh. It’s close enough that I’m out.
Posted by Saint Alfonzo
Member since Jan 2019
22207 posts
Posted on 8/28/22 at 3:07 pm to
It would have to get a hell of a lot cheaper. We were looking to take the Amtrak Acela train from NYC to Boston, traveling first class. Grand total round trip would have been over $1200. For that kind of money, they can kiss my arse, I'd rather walk.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram