- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 6/11/15 at 7:48 am to WeeWee
Who's more to blame, John Rolfe or Eli Whitney?
Posted on 6/11/15 at 7:51 am to High C
quote:
Who's more to blame, John Rolfe or Eli Whitney?
The first human that learned that it was easier to sharpen a stick and force his neighbor to do his labor for him.
Posted on 6/11/15 at 7:58 am to WeeWee
Again, limiting the discussion to America.
Posted on 6/11/15 at 8:02 am to High C
quote:
Again, limiting the discussion to America.
Eli Whitney.
John Rolfe lived during the period in which indentured servitude was more popular or economical than slavery. Slavery was also on the way out until Whitney invented the cotton gin and crowned cotton as King.
Posted on 6/11/15 at 8:03 am to Sentrius
quote:
This country would be basically a giant Sweden, Iceland, Denmark or Norway and it woukd be even richer than it is now and healthier and much more attractive too. It would also have a very much more limited gov't than today
Did you mean Switzerland?
Posted on 6/11/15 at 8:14 am to Markie812
quote:
The civil war is a huge cause of racism in America, if a war wasn't fought over the slavery of blacks this country would have a very low percentage of racist people in this country. The immigration of blacks would have been voluntary and resulted in people that wanted to better themselves. The incarceration rate in this country would also not be the highest in the world per capita.
As they say, History is written by the winners.
The Civil War did not start out over slavery. it started out over state's rights vs. the federal government. Some states had already abolished slavery and others were on their way towards outlawing it.
Slavery was brought into the equation and mentioned specifically by Lincoln to sway Britain and France away from supporting the South and sending troops over here to help the South whip his arse. Both of their economies at the time were textile and agrarian based and they depended on the cotton from the South for income.
You do realize that very few in the South actually owned slaves. Most people in the South were share-croppers and had it almost as bad as the slaves. Why in the hell would they fight for slavery when the majority of them were practically slaves themselves?
This post was edited on 6/11/15 at 8:18 am
Posted on 6/11/15 at 8:15 am to WeeWee
If not for Rolfe, Eli Whitney would never have been heard of. I'm thinking that what became the English agricultural colonies would have failed, and everything south of today's New York would have become Spanish. If that was the case, the Spanish would have likely conquered the few, sparsely populated English colonies to their north, and an English heritage America would have never existed.
Posted on 6/11/15 at 8:15 am to rpg37
Another interesting question is what would the country and particularly the South look like if slavery had died out on its own, peacefully, as it was going to inevitably do with the Industrial Revolution and evolving morality? A whole lot better on all sides.
Posted on 6/11/15 at 8:17 am to rpg37
probably similar to the Nordic countries.
Posted on 6/11/15 at 8:26 am to rpg37
Also, no soul food. I don't want to live in a world without soul food.
Posted on 6/11/15 at 8:26 am to High C
quote:
If not for Rolfe, Eli Whitney would never have been heard of. I'm thinking that what became the English agricultural colonies would have failed, and everything south of today's New York would have become Spanish. If that was the case, the Spanish would have likely conquered the few, sparsely populated English colonies to their north, and an English heritage America would have never existed.
The Spanish had no interest in North America. They explored it for almost a hundred years before Jamestown. They were interested in gold only and there was no gold to found in 16th century North America. If it had not been for Rolfe cultivating tobacco America would be nothing more than a few logging camps to produce raw material for the European navies, religious settlements, and fur tadeposts.
Posted on 6/11/15 at 8:27 am to engvol
And missing seeing all of this?


Posted on 6/11/15 at 8:32 am to WeeWee
quote:
f it had not been for Rolfe cultivating tobacco America would be nothing more than a few logging camps to produce raw material for the European navies, religious settlements, and fur tadeposts.
So, Rolfe then?
Posted on 6/11/15 at 8:40 am to High C
Australia? It was settled primarily by folks from England, and they dominated the native inhabitants.
Pretty much America, without the African slavery. They did enslave many Aborigines and South Pacific Islanders, but they had no civil war and the major cultural and legal shifts that followed it.
We have much greater natural resources than them, so that would make us a much richer version of Australia.
Pretty much America, without the African slavery. They did enslave many Aborigines and South Pacific Islanders, but they had no civil war and the major cultural and legal shifts that followed it.
We have much greater natural resources than them, so that would make us a much richer version of Australia.
Posted on 6/11/15 at 8:40 am to SEClint
quote:Motherfricking right, we in this motherfricker until the motherfricking end, motherfrickers
No flexible use of the word "motherfricker".
This post was edited on 6/11/15 at 8:47 am
Posted on 6/11/15 at 8:44 am to rpg37
quote:
Slaves helped build the nation, but a war fought over slavery destroyed parts of it.
idiot
Posted on 6/11/15 at 8:46 am to Sentrius
quote:
This country would be basically a giant Sweden, Iceland, Denmark or Norway
Not even close.
You would still have a large Asian and Hispanic population. Also, there would still be blacks here due to immigration.
Popular
Back to top




1






