- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 2/25/16 at 1:09 pm to Jimmydatiger
This is why I've invested $35 in robotronic research. I could have bought chrome truck nuts instead, but I'm responsible.
Posted on 2/25/16 at 1:11 pm to SEClint
quote:
As overpopulation grows, mandatory death will take place on your 65th birthday.
See you on Carousel.
Posted on 2/25/16 at 1:14 pm to Jimmydatiger
quote:
artificial intelligence will be able to figure out 90pc of office jobs w in 15 years.
No it won't.
Posted on 2/25/16 at 1:14 pm to LucasP
I like how you think the lawyers are the "blood sucking" profession.
Posted on 2/25/16 at 1:17 pm to fr33manator
Great, more bums begging me for money.
Posted on 2/25/16 at 1:19 pm to dcrews
Hologram NFL referees..they will have eyes on each player and monitor their actions with 100% accuracy. Determining if their actions met illegal standard.
Also will keep perfect time of play and game clocks.
Perfect ball spots.
No discussions or replay view time needed.
No accidental blocks or play interference.
Also will keep perfect time of play and game clocks.
Perfect ball spots.
No discussions or replay view time needed.
No accidental blocks or play interference.
Posted on 2/25/16 at 1:21 pm to SEClint
I often wonder why we still have refs on the field now. Besides spotting the ball and breaking up fights, there's no reason they shouldn't operate entirely from a booth.
Posted on 2/25/16 at 1:23 pm to LucasP
The fact that they still spot the ball based on their perception (often from a terrible angle) and then measure the first downs with chains is a bit baffling.
Should be really easy to technologically determine when a punt goes out of bounds as well.. instead you have a referee running up from 20 yards downfield guessing at it.
Should be really easy to technologically determine when a punt goes out of bounds as well.. instead you have a referee running up from 20 yards downfield guessing at it.
Posted on 2/25/16 at 1:29 pm to HornsLife
You want a kiosk to tell you that the shake machine is broken?
Posted on 2/25/16 at 1:38 pm to torrey225
quote:
You want a kiosk to tell you that the shake machine is broken?
I'd prefer a kiosk that kills the worker who won't clean the shake machine
This post was edited on 2/25/16 at 1:39 pm
Posted on 2/25/16 at 1:41 pm to fr33manator
Their carcasses will be rendered down into oils to grease the machine parts.
Uh duh.
Uh duh.
Posted on 2/25/16 at 1:45 pm to PrideofTheSEC
quote:
I like how you think the lawyers are the "blood sucking" profession.
Yeah, they're more like parasitic mites latched onto the blood-sucking leeches of society.
Posted on 2/25/16 at 1:47 pm to fr33manator
a lot of them will have to give up their football, basketball, and baseball tickets, and hang out on TD.
Posted on 2/25/16 at 1:54 pm to PrideofTheSEC
quote:
I like how you think the lawyers are the "blood sucking" profession.
I actually agree with Steven Wright on this issue when he said, "99% of lawyers give the rest a bad name."
Posted on 2/25/16 at 1:58 pm to fr33manator
I don't think people realize just what's going to hit over the next 2 decades. People say "they always say that about new technology", but new technology has never come after so many jobs at once. Within the next 2 decades the technology and economics will be there to replace pretty much any job that's routine.
It's not just hitting one industry, this wave of technology will hit the low hanging fruit of every industry practically all at once. You won't see the new tech slowly creep from segment to segment of the economy, like the ATM mainstreaming and then 15 years later self checkout at the grocery store comes along. You'll see everyone that drives for a living become less valuable in the span of maybe 5 years. Truck drivers, taxi drivers, limo drivers, even the soccer mom might lose her job to a Johnny Cab. When you go to a doctor or lawyer now, you may interact with 2-4 people before you see the actual professional. Most if not all of those front line people will be replaced by interactive kiosks that will handle the basic assessment.
In the long term society will hopefully adjust and we won't get stuck in an idiocratic state, but in the short term our new self serve world will be so disruptive to the value of human capital that I don't see how we get by without massive wealth redistribution. On the positive side, we shouldn't lose much because the economic output will remain the same or possibly increase, it's just that the amount of human input required to get the same output will fall off a cliff.
It's not just hitting one industry, this wave of technology will hit the low hanging fruit of every industry practically all at once. You won't see the new tech slowly creep from segment to segment of the economy, like the ATM mainstreaming and then 15 years later self checkout at the grocery store comes along. You'll see everyone that drives for a living become less valuable in the span of maybe 5 years. Truck drivers, taxi drivers, limo drivers, even the soccer mom might lose her job to a Johnny Cab. When you go to a doctor or lawyer now, you may interact with 2-4 people before you see the actual professional. Most if not all of those front line people will be replaced by interactive kiosks that will handle the basic assessment.
In the long term society will hopefully adjust and we won't get stuck in an idiocratic state, but in the short term our new self serve world will be so disruptive to the value of human capital that I don't see how we get by without massive wealth redistribution. On the positive side, we shouldn't lose much because the economic output will remain the same or possibly increase, it's just that the amount of human input required to get the same output will fall off a cliff.
Posted on 2/25/16 at 2:21 pm to ManBearTiger
biodiesel
everyone has value
everyone has value
Posted on 2/25/16 at 2:49 pm to TigerinATL
quote:
I don't think people realize just what's going to hit over the next 2 decades.
I've been working in automation and controls for over 2 decades. Robotics have been around for longer than most people realize. Recent developments in humanoid type robots, in particular, as well as other bipedal, quadrupedal and other legged robots have made people consider what these may replace in the future.
Ultimately, with robotics, in particular, and technology, in general, there is always a cost/payback line. this is particularly true for menial labor, where skill requirements are limited and the primary determinate will be the cost to do the work. In essence, cheap labor means fewer robots and complex tasks mean fewer robots.
quote:
In the long term society will hopefully adjust and we won't get stuck in an idiocratic state, but in the short term our new self serve world will be so disruptive to the value of human capital that I don't see how we get by without massive wealth redistribution.
I believe there is a great deal of truth in this statement , though I'm not convinced these events will precipitate in my lifetime.
Posted on 2/25/16 at 2:52 pm to fr33manator
The same thing that will happen to the lawyers, doctors, nurses, engineers and architects when AI takes their jobs, too. They'll be out of work, with no jobs available, ever, and nobody knows how society will handle it.
Popular
Back to top




0








