- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What do plant operators do? And how much do they really make?
Posted on 4/24/18 at 2:49 pm to MusclesofBrussels
Posted on 4/24/18 at 2:49 pm to MusclesofBrussels
quote:
wouldn't call that "rich"
It's rich. Quite a few people here have a very socially weird view of the world.
Posted on 4/24/18 at 2:50 pm to lsu777
quote:
What is your deal with operators?
Nothing actually. I just troll the perpetually offended that live outside of reality. I couldn't care less about them, but they all lie and refuse to admit any of the drawbacks of the job so I try to make them mad.
Posted on 4/24/18 at 2:51 pm to lsu777
quote:
But if you are a professional and remotely successful you are prolly working 10 hours a day, 50+ hours a week and not getting paid for those hours.

Posted on 4/24/18 at 2:55 pm to Epic Cajun
Unless a miracle happens and I become a pro golfer, there is no such thing as an "awesome" job out there. I hate getting up and going to work. And if it was not being an operator, I'm sure I'd find something to bitch about to be in a much better schedule. It's like the old saying, for every beautiful woman you see out there, somebody is tired of fricking her. Same thing with that "awesome" job. As far as I'm concerned, if the pay and benefits are great, I'm happy (and so are the wife and kids). 

Posted on 4/24/18 at 2:56 pm to lsu777
quote:
Dude it is a good job for 90% of the population.
Is it, though? I guess if you only value money, it might be a good job for 90% of the population. But, I'd rather a job making 80k and working M-F 40 hours a week, than a job making 120k working shift work and overtime. I might value flexibility more than most though.
In my line of work, I could work travel consulting and double my pay, but I'd rather be home than on the road M-TH. There are plenty of people who do it, it's just not for me.
Posted on 4/24/18 at 3:13 pm to lsu777
lsu777,
You have the best posts with this thread.
As a process operator at PPG Industries I worked eight hour shifts from 1976 to 1994 and twelve hour shifts from 1994 until retirement.
The normal rotation was flawed becasue it went from evenings>days>to graveyards. Overtime typically was four hours by splitting shifts resulting in sleep deprivation.
It took a lot of effort by a very few to get a twelve-hour shift trial period.
The company tried could not comprehend the fact that each rotation will pay 240 hours in a six week period. ( 6 x 40) = (2 x 48 + 4 x36). The IAM union fought a twelve hour shift notion because "orgainzed labor fought for many years to establish an eight hour workday. Some maintenance workers feared that they would have a permanent or rotating night schedule.
Each area was given a six month trial period. The first area to try it objectections were 1. we have too much time off and do not save enough money 2. Overtime is a twelve hour period.
Eventually it was accepted by all of the departments.
PPG Industries was able to save substantially because absenteeism was dramatically reduced.
You have the best posts with this thread.
As a process operator at PPG Industries I worked eight hour shifts from 1976 to 1994 and twelve hour shifts from 1994 until retirement.
The normal rotation was flawed becasue it went from evenings>days>to graveyards. Overtime typically was four hours by splitting shifts resulting in sleep deprivation.
It took a lot of effort by a very few to get a twelve-hour shift trial period.
The company tried could not comprehend the fact that each rotation will pay 240 hours in a six week period. ( 6 x 40) = (2 x 48 + 4 x36). The IAM union fought a twelve hour shift notion because "orgainzed labor fought for many years to establish an eight hour workday. Some maintenance workers feared that they would have a permanent or rotating night schedule.
Each area was given a six month trial period. The first area to try it objectections were 1. we have too much time off and do not save enough money 2. Overtime is a twelve hour period.
Eventually it was accepted by all of the departments.
PPG Industries was able to save substantially because absenteeism was dramatically reduced.
Posted on 4/24/18 at 3:16 pm to Lookin4Par
You don’t have to work a ton of overtime to make good money. These days most decent company’s base pay is around 90-100k per year. That’s without built in overtime added.
As with any shift work you work about the equivalent of 15 days per month. I can pick up one or two extra days a month and still have all the days I want off. Those two extra days a month can add up to around 15-18K extra a year. There are many guys that just like the money and work much more, but that’s not for everybody.
Also college is not for everybody. Education doesn’t automatically equal intelligence.
Operators generally fall into two categories. There are dead head valve turners and people that make shite happen.
As with any shift work you work about the equivalent of 15 days per month. I can pick up one or two extra days a month and still have all the days I want off. Those two extra days a month can add up to around 15-18K extra a year. There are many guys that just like the money and work much more, but that’s not for everybody.
Also college is not for everybody. Education doesn’t automatically equal intelligence.
Operators generally fall into two categories. There are dead head valve turners and people that make shite happen.
Posted on 4/24/18 at 3:17 pm to Epic Cajun
quote:
Epic Cajun
you seem really invested in this argument
i guess it's a good thing that there are people willing to give up holidays and work shift work, or we wouldn't have doctors, police, prisons, and .....plant operators
if people weren't willing to do it, i guess they would start paying 50+ per hour and the costs of a lot of goods would go up
Posted on 4/24/18 at 3:18 pm to RealityTiger
quote:
A good operator will make a good engineer and vice versa.
Respectfully, I disagree with this. Engineers do not possess the ability to stop fricking with stuff. Which oftentimes is exactly what is needed.
Posted on 4/24/18 at 3:23 pm to fightin tigers
quote:
Respectfully, I disagree with this. Engineers do not possess the ability to stop fricking with stuff. Which oftentimes is exactly what is needed.
LOL people that get one of the highest paying 4 year degrees with some of the most rigorous course work can't do the job of some baw that turns a wrench starting at 18.
Eta: I down voted your post.
This post was edited on 4/24/18 at 3:28 pm
Posted on 4/24/18 at 3:24 pm to fightin tigers
Did this thread just go Operators vs. Engineers?!
frick. YES.
frick. YES.

Posted on 4/24/18 at 3:26 pm to Mingo Was His NameO
Operator threads never disappoint 

Posted on 4/24/18 at 3:28 pm to fightin tigers
quote:
Respectfully, I disagree with this. Engineers do not possess the ability to stop fricking with stuff. Which oftentimes is exactly what is needed.
Because you have been dealing with dumbass engineers. Just like some operators are dumb as hell, some engineers are too. Or you cant understand that there are more efficient ways and productions vs cost is not were it needs to be.
Posted on 4/24/18 at 3:31 pm to fightin tigers
quote:
Respectfully, I disagree with this. Engineers do not possess the ability to stop fricking with stuff. Which oftentimes is exactly what is needed.
True. There are good ones and bad ones just as there are good and bad operators. I’ve had some operators straight lie to my face about inconsequential shite several times.
“Ed, did you open the vent valve?”
“Yeah, on my last round upstairs.”
“Huh, we’re not getting anything through, can you go check again.”
(Flow suddenly increases)
Ed: “Yep, I checked it. It’s open.”
I’d say about 10% of engineers have the work ethic and common sense to make good operators, and 10% of operators have the aptitude and problem solving skills to make good engineers.
Posted on 4/24/18 at 3:31 pm to lsu777
quote:
Because you have been dealing with dumbass engineers. Just like some operators are dumb as hell, some engineers are too. Or you cant understand that there are more efficient ways and productions vs cost is not were it needs to be.
Again, respectfully disagree. I have actually found the worse the engineer the better they were at an operations mindset.
I think it is just a mindset. Driven engineer vs process focused operation. Especially true when optimizing processes or testing unit limits.
This post was edited on 4/24/18 at 3:33 pm
Posted on 4/24/18 at 3:32 pm to Croacka
quote:
you seem really invested in this argument
I'm not really invested in it, I have a couple relatives who are operators and I see how it affects their lives though. I also think it's funny how there is such a pro-blue collar, anti-white collar mindset by some on the board. Operator work is not as good as some make it out to be, and it's not as shitty as others will have you believe.
Also, not all doctors give up holidays and work shift work

Posted on 4/24/18 at 3:33 pm to Epic Cajun
quote:
Is it, though? I guess if you only value money, it might be a good job for 90% of the population. But, I'd rather a job making 80k and working M-F 40 hours a week, than a job making 120k working shift work and overtime. I might value flexibility more than most though.
In my line of work, I could work travel consulting and double my pay, but I'd rather be home than on the road M-TH. There are plenty of people who do it, it's just not for me.
I guess you missed the whole stats I posted about the median salary with a BS being 59k in Louisiana or it being 59k across the US for those with a bachelor's degree regardless of years of experience.
Most aren't making 80k period, not even close. And btw most operators, aren't operators for more than 10-15 years before they get a chance to move up if they are worth a shite. Some don't take it and like shift work but many do.
And I get the whole traveling thing. I could do the same as you and yea it's not for me either, but have some perspective. Most aren't touching what an operator makes no matter how many years experience nor if they travel. Especially without a professional degree.
Some of y'all need to step outside your bubble.
And damn it this better not turn into an engeers vs operators thread.
Posted on 4/24/18 at 3:35 pm to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:
LOL people that get one of the highest paying 4 year degrees with some of the most rigorous course work can't do the job of some baw that turns a wrench starting at 18
This theory actually gets tested every few years when contracts come up. Pretty insightful.
Posted on 4/24/18 at 3:36 pm to fightin tigers
Then you haven't dealt with good engineers. A good engineer should be able to do an operators job with 3 months training, maybe not everything but a damn good amount. Scene it happen many times on strikes. A good engineer should also understand business, which sadly is a very very rare commodity especially with the chemical engineers I have met.
Posted on 4/24/18 at 3:37 pm to lsu777
A monkey can do a job with 3 months training. Doesnt mean they are any good at it.
Popular
Back to top
