- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

What are Your Views of Conscientious Objectors/Pacifists?
Posted on 9/27/17 at 5:54 pm
Posted on 9/27/17 at 5:54 pm
Me personally, I believe if your home, country, family are under attack or threatened to be under attack and you don't take a stand or do something to help your cause that you're selfish.
Take the British in WWI with the white feather movement, some of those guys were pacifists and they knew that hundreds of thousands of their fellow countrymen were dying in heaps and they weren't over there helping with the cause. I do find that selfish in a way.
I can understand to a certain extent being a CO on religious grounds, though.
It's a difficult subject to broach though and I can see the other side's argument, though I really can't agree with them.
Take the British in WWI with the white feather movement, some of those guys were pacifists and they knew that hundreds of thousands of their fellow countrymen were dying in heaps and they weren't over there helping with the cause. I do find that selfish in a way.
I can understand to a certain extent being a CO on religious grounds, though.
It's a difficult subject to broach though and I can see the other side's argument, though I really can't agree with them.
Posted on 9/27/17 at 5:55 pm to TigerFanInSouthland
I wish everyone were a pacifist
Posted on 9/27/17 at 5:56 pm to TigerFanInSouthland
Being a pacifist is for the weak


Posted on 9/27/17 at 5:57 pm to TigerFanInSouthland
Depends on the situation- Vietnam was completely acceptable. Same as Iraqi freedom or whateverits called.
Posted on 9/27/17 at 5:58 pm to TigerFanInSouthland
No problem with it. There are plenty of support jobs that need to be done. Now CO's that are opposed to any service at all? I'd limit that to those with legitimate religious reasons.
Posted on 9/27/17 at 5:59 pm to TigerFanInSouthland
Vietnam thread in 3...2...1
Posted on 9/27/17 at 6:00 pm to TigerFanInSouthland
quote:
Me personally, I believe if your home, country, family are under attack or threatened to be under attack and you don't take a stand or do something to help your cause that you're selfish.
Take the British in WWI with the white feather movement, some of those guys were pacifists and they knew that hundreds of thousands of their fellow countrymen were dying in heaps and they weren't over there helping with the cause. I do find that selfish in a way.
If it's legit, it's hard to argue and I think it infringes on your liberties if their objection is denied. With that said a lot of it, I'm, is people being cowards or wanting to gain attention from "sticking it to the Man"
This post was edited on 9/27/17 at 6:01 pm
Posted on 9/27/17 at 6:00 pm to TigerFanInSouthland
quote:
Me personally, I believe if your home, country, family are under attack or threatened to be under attack and you don't take a stand or do something to help your cause that you're selfish
what experience do you have with this?
Posted on 9/27/17 at 6:03 pm to cgrand
quote:
what experience do you have with this?
Nobody on this board. Unless an old Baw is on here at 95 years old and still has some inter web skills.
Posted on 9/27/17 at 6:03 pm to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:
If it's legit, it's hard to argue and I think it infringes on your liberties if their objection is denied.
That's why I said I think it's selfish, not that they should be imprisoned or anything of the sort.
Posted on 9/27/17 at 6:15 pm to TigerFanInSouthland
I hate the idea of a draft. If your country is being attacked and not enough citizens respond then that says it all. A draft should never be required unless your country is under direct attack.
On the other hand making heroes out of Vietnam CO's is stupid too. A lot were legitimate. Many, probably the majority, were not.
On the other hand making heroes out of Vietnam CO's is stupid too. A lot were legitimate. Many, probably the majority, were not.
Posted on 9/27/17 at 6:21 pm to Tigris
quote:
I hate the idea of a draft. If your country is being attacked and not enough citizens respond then that says it all. A draft should never be required unless your country is under direct attack.
So you wouldn't have been cool with the draft in WWII? The only time the country was attacked was Pearl Harbor and that wasn't even a state yet.
I think the draft is necessary in a huge war like that.
This post was edited on 9/27/17 at 6:22 pm
Posted on 9/27/17 at 6:22 pm to TigerFanInSouthland
quote:After WW2? Heroes.
Conscientious Objectors/
During WW2? Very few justifiable reasons. Self defense > pacifism
Posted on 9/27/17 at 6:24 pm to Blue Velvet
quote:
After WW2? Heroes.
horseshite, just because you want to stick it to the man isn't a good enough reason.
Posted on 9/27/17 at 6:24 pm to TigerFanInSouthland
What about the cat in Hacksaw Ridge
Posted on 9/27/17 at 6:26 pm to TigerFanInSouthland
Not wanting to get shot in the jungle over communism on the other side of the globe =\= "sticking it to the man"
Posted on 9/27/17 at 6:27 pm to TigerFanInSouthland
quote:The man was sending young men off to die in unnecessary wars started for malicious reasons and rationalized on lies. frick the man. Dodge the draft; it's the moral thing to do.
horseshite, just because you want to stick it to the man isn't a good enough reason.
Posted on 9/27/17 at 6:27 pm to TigerFanInSouthland
he's a good example of CO/pacifist hero
Popular
Back to top

18









