- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What are the origins this California vs Louisiana feud on Tigerdroppings?
Posted on 6/8/18 at 9:19 am to lsupride87
Posted on 6/8/18 at 9:19 am to lsupride87
quote:
Christ on a cracker can y’all get anything right?
From 2010-2017 CA gained 6.13% in population
Cool, but that's not what I said. Many people can leave the state and total population can still increase - babies are born every day. But people are getting the hell out of certain areas where it's become impossible to afford the cost of living.
LINK
2
Posted on 6/8/18 at 9:21 am to The Pirate King
quote:
If soulless, vapid, materialistic, and douchey is better for you, then go ahead and move out there.
Says the person that has probably never been to Cali
Posted on 6/8/18 at 9:24 am to SUB
quote:
babies are born every day
quote:
Birth rate: Louisiana, 2005-2015. In 2015, there were 64,692 live births in Louisiana. The population of women of childbearing age (ages 15-44) in Louisiana in 2015 was estimated to be 943,958. The birth rate in Louisiana in 2015 was 68.5 per 1,000 women ages 15-44.
quote:
Birth rate: California, 2005-2015. In 2015, there were 491,748 live births in California. The population of women of childbearing age (ages 15-44) in California in 2015 was estimated to be 8,084,612. The birth rate in California in 2015 was 60.8 per 1,000 women ages 15-44
More recent:
quote:
California's birthrate dropped to its lowest level ever in 2016, according to data released by the state's Department of Finance. Between July 2015 and July of this year, there were 12.42 births per 1,000 Californians, the agency said this week.
Posted on 6/8/18 at 9:32 am to stout
California the state is awesome.
It's the people that live there that make it shitty.
It's the people that live there that make it shitty.
Posted on 6/8/18 at 9:33 am to Centinel
That’s quite the generalization.
Posted on 6/8/18 at 9:35 am to GeorgeTheGreek
Fine, fine. I guess maybe the very northern part of the state may have decent people.
But all areas I've visited? Douchebags. Douchebags everywhere.
But all areas I've visited? Douchebags. Douchebags everywhere.
Posted on 6/8/18 at 9:37 am to Centinel
I’ve visited San Francisco, San Diego, and Napa valley and had great experiences with everyone I met.
Posted on 6/8/18 at 9:40 am to Centinel
The common denominator everywhere you went was you. Hmmmm....
Posted on 6/8/18 at 9:40 am to iPadThai
There is no feud. Louisianians have a terribly warped perception of California, and Californians have a terribly warped perception of the rest of the country.
Posted on 6/8/18 at 9:40 am to Sentrius
quote:
I'm talking about California metro. Like LA, SF, Oakland, Burbank San Jose, and whatnot. They have the same problems that Baton Rouge and
I live in a condo on the beach here and yea its expensive but the quality of life vs baton rouge or NOLA isn't even comparable imo.
Posted on 6/8/18 at 9:41 am to GeorgeTheGreek
I'm being polite. My wife had and in-laws had much worse things to say.
And they're all from Seattle.
And they're all from Seattle.
Posted on 6/8/18 at 9:46 am to Sentrius
quote:
I could, wait no, do say the same about you.
That was a solid "I know you are but what am I!" response.
quote:
You're the one that's nitpicking an example I posted while ignoring my broader claim that's absolutely true.
Nitpicking an example? You showed photos of a large house and claimed that this was, and I'm quoting you, "4,045 sqft. $478,871"
You actually tried to get away with saying this home would go for $118/sqft in the Dallas suburbs, but then refused to give a link. So either a) you lied, or b) this house is nowhere near civilization, which would tremendously weaken your argument.
As soon as everyone pointed that out, you just claimed people were "nitpicking" because you got caught in a bullshite lie.
For the record, if someone is happy living in the middle of nowhere where the COL is cheap and they can live in a nice house on a bunch of land, more power to them. I would much rather be in a city, but that's a personal preference. But your assertion that it's a "bad investment" and that people who live in smaller houses/apartments at a higher cost are unhappy and spend their entire paycheck to live in the house so they can't afford to enjoy where they live is asinine.
This post was edited on 6/8/18 at 9:48 am
Posted on 6/8/18 at 9:49 am to AbitaFan08
A $700k difference is just semantics, man”
Posted on 6/8/18 at 10:05 am to TH03
quote:
A $700k difference is just semantics, man”
Based on comps, I believe he was off by anywhere between $1-1.5 million.
But yeah, semantics and nitpicking.
Posted on 6/8/18 at 10:08 am to SUB
quote:Cool. Here is a map of pure migration, not births
Cool, but that's not what I said. Many people can leave the state and total population can still increase - babies are born every day. But people are getting the hell out of certain areas where it's become impossible to afford the cost of living.
Notice more people are leaving Louisiana than California
Page 10 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News