Started By
Message
locked post

What age would you choose?

Posted on 1/20/16 at 1:49 pm
Posted by RandySavage
9 Time Natty Winner
Member since May 2012
35822 posts
Posted on 1/20/16 at 1:49 pm
Let's say you could be guaranteed to live to a certain age of your choice or you could just roll the dice and let things play out naturally meaning you could outlive your chosen age or die tomorrow.

What's the lowest age you would accept?

Also, for the sake of the scenario let's say after you made your choice you wouldn't remember the answer, or even that you had a choice, so you can't say you would choose 90 and know you would never die before then. So you would live your life the same either way.

I think my number would probably be around 74.
Posted by jimbeam
University of LSU
Member since Oct 2011
75703 posts
Posted on 1/20/16 at 1:51 pm to
100
Posted by TulaneUVA
Member since Jun 2005
26238 posts
Posted on 1/20/16 at 1:51 pm to
Nowhere in your post did you make any sense.

I wish I could quote the principle in Billy Madison.
Posted by Placebeaux
Bobby Fischer Fan Club President
Member since Jun 2008
51852 posts
Posted on 1/20/16 at 1:52 pm to
Id take 22
Posted by BayouBengals03
lsu14always
Member since Nov 2007
99999 posts
Posted on 1/20/16 at 1:53 pm to
quote:

principal
Posted by TigerstuckinMS
Member since Nov 2005
33687 posts
Posted on 1/20/16 at 1:54 pm to
Posted by Lionnation1993
Member since Nov 2013
6103 posts
Posted on 1/20/16 at 1:54 pm to
90.
Great grandpa lived to be 103
One great grandma lived to be 103
One great grandma lived to be 95
Both my grandpa's in their Mid 70's still fishing every day and one plays golf and shoots his age at pelican point 3 days a week.

90 or I'm taking my chances, especially since thats 68 years away for me and who knows what kind of medical developments will happen by then
Posted by TulaneUVA
Member since Jun 2005
26238 posts
Posted on 1/20/16 at 1:55 pm to
Whatever man. iPhone
Posted by KarlMalonesFlipPhone
Member since Sep 2015
3848 posts
Posted on 1/20/16 at 1:56 pm to
How many pots have you smoken?
Posted by Cdawg
TigerFred's Living Room
Member since Sep 2003
62218 posts
Posted on 1/20/16 at 1:57 pm to
147
Posted by Peazey
Metry
Member since Apr 2012
25427 posts
Posted on 1/20/16 at 1:59 pm to
quote:

This is not my own fantastical opinion—many people have thought the same; but I feel it so deeply that I’ll tell you what I think. I believe that to execute a man for murder is to punish him immeasurably more dreadfully than is equivalent to his crime. A murder by sentence is far more dreadful than a murder committed by a criminal. The man who is attacked by robbers at night, in a dark wood, or anywhere, undoubtedly hopes and hopes that he may yet escape until the very moment of his death. There are plenty of instances of a man running away, or imploring for mercy—at all events hoping on in some degree—even after his throat was cut. But in the case of an execution, that last hope—having which it is so immeasurably less dreadful to die,—is taken away from the wretch and certainty substituted in its place! There is his sentence, and with it that terrible certainty that he cannot possibly escape death—which, I consider, must be the most dreadful anguish in the world. You may place a soldier before a cannon’s mouth in battle, and fire upon him—and he will still hope. But read to that same soldier his death-sentence, and he will either go mad or burst into tears. Who dares to say that any man can suffer this without going mad? No, no! it is an abuse, a shame, it is unnecessary—why should such a thing exist? Doubtless there may be men who have been sentenced, who have suffered this mental anguish for a while and then have been reprieved; perhaps such men may have been able to relate their feelings afterwards. Our Lord Christ spoke of this anguish and dread. No! no! no! No man should be treated so, no man, no man!”


I'd rather not see my death coming. Just let oblivion meet me quickly or in my sleep if I am lucky.
Posted by PhiTiger1764
Lurker since Aug 2003
Member since Oct 2009
14616 posts
Posted on 1/20/16 at 2:00 pm to
I think I'd go with 85. I'll probably outlive 85, given family health and history, and the constant advancement of medicine... but I'd sacrifice those last 5-10 years shitting in a diaper to guarantee that I'd make it through most of life with the people I love and who love me... and not die in some freak accident at a young age.
Posted by RandySavage
9 Time Natty Winner
Member since May 2012
35822 posts
Posted on 1/20/16 at 2:02 pm to
That's why I added the disclaimer, after you choose you won't remember making the choice so you won't know when your time is coming.
Posted by RandySavage
9 Time Natty Winner
Member since May 2012
35822 posts
Posted on 1/20/16 at 2:05 pm to
quote:

I think I'd go with 85. I'll probably outlive 85, given family health and history, and the constant advancement of medicine... but I'd sacrifice those last 5-10 years shitting in a diaper to guarantee that I'd make it through most of life with the people I love and who love me... and not die in some freak accident at a young age.


That's my thinking too. 74 would give me 41 more years which would theoretically give me time to watch my children grow up and be established and watch my grandchildren grow into teens/early 20s and get to spoil them while they were young. I'd sacrifice anything over that for these basic pleasures.
This post was edited on 1/20/16 at 2:06 pm
Posted by CocoLoco
Member since Jan 2012
29108 posts
Posted on 1/20/16 at 2:32 pm to
Getting older scares the hell out of me. Getting all ugly and not being able to care for yourself like you used to. frick.


So I suppose once I can no longer do fun shite, take me out.


Hopefully I at least look good well into my 30s,40s and maybe even 50s. Maybe by then we will have such great advancements that I can stay looking and feeling much , much younger.
Posted by rd280z
Richmond
Member since Jan 2007
2520 posts
Posted on 1/20/16 at 2:36 pm to
I would have to know what kind of shape I would be in before I made the choice. If I was going to take 90 and be a vegetable in a nursing home, I would roll the dice. Need more info. for my choice
Posted by CSATiger
The Battlefield
Member since Aug 2010
7002 posts
Posted on 1/20/16 at 2:41 pm to
"Who wants to live to be 100, a man who is 99"
-Dwight Eisenhower
Posted by biglego
San Francisco
Member since Nov 2007
85543 posts
Posted on 1/20/16 at 2:45 pm to
My brain was already full of frick and now after reading this I'm just gonna go sit in the corner and stare at the wall
Posted by Displaced
Member since Dec 2011
33054 posts
Posted on 1/20/16 at 2:46 pm to
quote:

think my number would probably be around 74.


probably about the same. i dont really want to live past this age anyway. old people seem miserable.
Posted by Walking the Earth
Member since Feb 2013
17464 posts
Posted on 1/20/16 at 2:47 pm to
350.

Sure there may be a rough 50-75 year patch but at some point the tech will get over the hump so that my body could be restored to youth and I can plug into some VR and be the god of my own universe.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram