- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 7/21/22 at 3:36 pm to Gaggle
It's very simple. Pay people to get coughed and sneezed on by sick people. Large sample, double blind, controlled, etc.
I'd be one of your subjects as long as I can see everything's on the up and up
There's not even any questionable studies that have done that and successfully made people sick. Only ones that have failed
It's very simple. It's a simple study. You've had 100 years of germ theory.
I'd be one of your subjects as long as I can see everything's on the up and up
There's not even any questionable studies that have done that and successfully made people sick. Only ones that have failed
It's very simple. It's a simple study. You've had 100 years of germ theory.
This post was edited on 7/21/22 at 3:38 pm
Posted on 7/21/22 at 3:38 pm to Gaggle
quote:
It's very simple. Pay people to get coughed and sneezed on by sick people. Large sample, double blind, controlled, etc.
HOW?
Posted on 7/21/22 at 3:38 pm to Gaggle
Lol, you posted the Rosenau experiment without any irony. It doesn't seem like weighing evidence is your strong-suit.
Again, it is very weird that you invoke the immune and then deny germ theory all in one breath. But I guess it isn't weird that you can't understand the connection.
Again, it is very weird that you invoke the immune and then deny germ theory all in one breath. But I guess it isn't weird that you can't understand the connection.
Posted on 7/21/22 at 3:39 pm to Gaggle
quote:
There's not even any questionable studies that have done that and successfully made people sick. Only ones that have failed
Post them. Post them with better quality than the Rosenau study please, because you apparently didn't understand the history of Pfeiffer's bacillus at all.
Posted on 7/21/22 at 3:42 pm to deathvalleyfreak43
quote:
Does the OT approve of this Jab?
Well, seeing that it’s an actual “vaccine” then yeah.
Posted on 7/21/22 at 3:42 pm to Slagathor
Any way you attempt. Have equal number of subjects experience the same environment over a period of time minus the cough and sneezing. Hell, compare to the general population. Don't even attempt to control at all. Hell, be shoddy. There is not even a shoddy one. Any parameters you want. Don't you think this is an issue it has never been done at all?
This post was edited on 7/21/22 at 3:44 pm
Posted on 7/21/22 at 3:49 pm to crazy4lsu
You know exactly why it shouldn't be accepted as any proof of such a theory. But you don't even wonder why such a simple idea isn't put to the simple test and everything is done in this roundabout "dynamic" way, contact tracing, after-the-fact "outbreak" studies, and the consensus can't be questioned. You don't wonder why it is this way. It's such a simple study. Why don't you wonder? You're not allowed to. It's absolutely pathetic
This post was edited on 7/21/22 at 3:50 pm
Posted on 7/21/22 at 3:51 pm to thejuiceisloose
quote:
Thank you to the anti-vaxxers
Lol. All of the thanks goes to our friends from the south of the border that come across illegally and our politicians that want votes from illegals.
Posted on 7/21/22 at 3:52 pm to Chingon Ag
quote:
Lol. All of the thanks goes to our friends from the south of the border that come across illegally and our politicians that want votes from illegals.
Thanks Biden Vaxers.
Posted on 7/21/22 at 3:52 pm to thejuiceisloose
quote:
Thank you to the anti-vaxxers
Most likely thanks to immigration, but if you're vaxxed, what do you care?
Posted on 7/21/22 at 3:54 pm to Gaggle
quote:
You know exactly why it shouldn't be accepted as any proof of such a theory. But you don't even wonder why such a simple idea isn't put to the simple test and everything is done in this roundabout "dynamic" way, contact tracing, after-the-facy "outbreak" studies, and the consensus can't be questioned. It's absolutely pathetic
Wow, I didn't know inference wasn't an allowed method of reasoning. I'm sure you are consistent about that.
Yet, in this case, the virus had the same specific genotype. Given that wild-type viruses have up to 12% variation of 150 AA sequence of a nucleoprotein, the fact all sequenced cases were of the same strain, which is a requirement for genotyping, is very curious. What's the terrain theory answer about this?
Posted on 7/21/22 at 3:55 pm to Mike da Tigah
quote:
Well, seeing that it’s an actual “vaccine” then yeah.
Is J&J and Novavax not ok? I thought the antivax Covid crowd was just anti-MRNA. These are two, traditional protein-based vaccines. Just curious where the covid antivaxxers stand
Posted on 7/21/22 at 3:57 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:The inference existed before the study, it is the only inference allowed, any other inference is verboten, every study absolutely must meet that inference.
Wow, I didn't know inference wasn't an allowed method of reasoning.
Don't you wonder why you are going on inferences when cold hard proof is so simple and clearly obtainable with a basic experiment, with all the world history of various experiments in the name of medicine, shouldn't it have been done a million times? And yet you can't find a single one? You should wonder about that.
This post was edited on 7/21/22 at 3:58 pm
Posted on 7/21/22 at 3:58 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
Would be pretty stupid to not get the polio vaccine since it, you know, actually works
And it appears to be one of the safest vaccines ever created. Yes, it killed some people at first and caused about 40,000 people to actually contract polio… but those glitches were worked out over time.
Late adopters benefitted the most from that vaccine. The sacrifice of those early human guinea pigs was really appreciated.
Isn’t that really the benefit of using human early adopters? Thank you all for your sacrifice!
Posted on 7/21/22 at 3:59 pm to PentagonTiger
quote:
Is J&J and Novavax not ok? I thought the antivax Covid crowd was just anti-MRNA. These are two, traditional protein-based vaccines. Just curious where the covid antivaxxers stand
That’s not the “vaccine” that had people fired over because they refused to have it injected in their bodies.
Posted on 7/21/22 at 4:00 pm to Gaggle
quote:
The inference existed before the study, it is the only inference allowed, any other inference is verboten, every study absolutely must meet that inference.
What is the inference before the study in this case? The fact is that 33 individuals who had measles had the same exact serotype of the disease. That specific serotype was unreported in Ireland before this particular outbreak. What can we reasonably infer? What is the terrain theory response to this?
quote:
Don't you wonder why you are going on inferences when cold hard proof is so simple and clearly obtainable with a basic experiment, with all the world history of various experiments in the name of medicine, shouldn't it have been done a million times? And yet you can't find a single one? You should wonder about that.
Yeah man, direct human experimentation of infectious disease is usually done at the population level, because the data is more robust. But maybe you should think things through as well for once. Or lest you post the Rosenau experiment again and pretend like that acts as all the proof you need, which is what you've done.
This post was edited on 7/21/22 at 4:02 pm
Posted on 7/21/22 at 4:03 pm to Mike da Tigah
quote:
That’s not the “vaccine” that had people fired over because they refused to have it injected in their bodies.
I get the sense that this is the real objection to Pfizer & Moderna vaccines, not mRNA technology which is often the stated/rationalized objection.
Posted on 7/21/22 at 4:04 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
What's the terrain theory answer about this?
Maybe the kids were swapping boogers.
Popular
Back to top


2





