re: We are in the midst of one of the worst classes of new posters

I like making fun of you only having one eye so it would be hypercritical for me to get upset if others "make fun" of me...

It all took a turn for the worst when you banned my alter 'Cleveland Steamer' during the Xmas holidays circa 2015.

quote:

---

What does it take for us to get some new posters that don't suck?

---

Bring back some of the guys who toed the line and made the board more entertaining. The OT thrives on controversy and bending the rules, more so now than ever when every topic has a specific board. All we can discuss on here now is St. George and OweO's shitty threads.

In a perfect world, the OT would be a free-for-all and the other boards would be where you can go to a safe, heavily monitored environment free of OT debauchery.

Another reason the new posters suck is that we no longer get the college students to start posting while in college, get banned a few times, then mature and become quality posters. New posters come from across the country, but the core base of posters from the LSU student population no longer seems to exist. Chicken should definitely get the Tigerdroppings name back out on campus.

I hereby call for a poster purge. All in favor say "aye"

quote:

---

I hereby call for a poster purge

---

last one to stand up gets banned for life

quote:

---

What does it take for us to get some new posters that don't suck?

---

Advertising

quote:

---

she is still doing well, thanks for asking!!

---

Really? I didn't think people still bought from them.

Wasn't there a period where they were not paying people?

quote:

---

she is still doing well, thanks for asking!!

---

quote:

---

Legal issues
In early 2017, a class-action lawsuit was filed against LuLaRoe by customers, who complained that the firm's proprietary point-of-sale software incorrectly calculated sales tax rates on interstate sales, and in jurisdictions which do not charge sales tax on clothing. These complaints, combined with complaints over poor quality, led to the company's Better Business Bureau (BBB) rating being downgraded to "F" in January 2017.[5][6][12]

In October 2017, a class-action lawsuit filed in California accused LuLaRoe of being a pyramid scheme. Plaintiffs in the suit allege the company engaged in "misconduct, including unfair business practices, misleading advertising, and breach of contract."[13][14] According to the $1 billion lawsuit, which LuLaRoe argues is baseless and inaccurate, the company allegedly advised its distributors "to borrow money [...] take out credit cards, and some were even asked to sell their breast milk" as ways to buy additional inventory.[15][16]

In January 2018, the National Down Syndrome Society (NDSS), a charity which had previously worked with LuLaRoe, ended its relationship with the company after a top distributor mocked people with mental disabilities during a livestream sale. The NDSS requested that LuLaRoe sever ties with the distributor, but LuLaRoe declined, stating that they accepted the distributor's apology. The video, and LuLaRoe's reaction to it, prompted widespread online criticism.[17][18][19]

In December 2018, in the midst of mounting debt, layoffs, and an exodus of top sellers, LuLaRoe was sued by its chief clothing supplier, Providence Industries, for nearly $49 million. The lawsuit claimed that LuLaRoe was insolvent and had not paid its bills for seven months, and accused founders Mark and DeAnne Stidham of hiding assets in "shell" companies to fund their "lavish lifestyle" and to "hinder, delay, and defraud the creditors."[20][21] In January 2019, the Washington State Attorney General's Office filed a lawsuit against LuLaRoe, as well as company CEO Mark Stidham and president DeAnne Stidham, alleging that the multilevel marketing company is an illegal "pyramid scheme," making misleading income claims, and encouraging its consultants to focus more on recruitment than selling clothes to customers.[9][22][23]

In January 2019, LuLaRoe's chief clothing supplier, Providence Industries, filed a lawsuit demanding a seizure of assets.[24] In February 2019, amid hundreds of new complaints totaling 300 cases, the company once again received an "F" rating from the BBB.[25]

---

This is from wiki so I know there is a chance it isn't 100% accurate, but how is she still doing well?

quote:

---

how is she still doing well?

---

Because she is a good salesperson. There is still a market for the clothes and she has a loyal customer following. Regardless of the business model, anyone who works hard and knows how to sell can succeed with them, and many do.