- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Washington Post: Delta Variant no more concerning for children than original strain
Posted on 7/23/21 at 8:34 am to lsupride87
Posted on 7/23/21 at 8:34 am to lsupride87
quote:
The doctors say the risk for children is the same as a normal flu season
which is even false
4
Posted on 7/23/21 at 8:36 am to lsupride87
quote:
It’s funny
The doctors say the risk for children is the same as a normal flu season
Then they say mask your fricking 3 year old. So, are they effectively saying we should have always masked our kids?
First, I agree masking kids is dumb as frick.
But I think their argument is to mask kids mainly to stop the spread so it doesn't reach more people in more vulnerable groups.
It's all dumb because those people have every chance to get vaccinated.
Posted on 7/23/21 at 8:36 am to Salmon
quote:Seems pretty similar to me
which is even false
350 covid Peds deaths last year
Flu averages 400 usually
I think a lot of kids get minor flu cases just like covid, you just never tested your kid before the year 2020 when he had a slight sniffle
Posted on 7/23/21 at 8:38 am to CatfishJohn
quote:Not yelling at you, but I’m going to yell at people that have that opinion
But I think their argument is to mask kids mainly to stop the spread so it doesn't reach more people in more vulnerable groups.
It’s not my 3 year old and 5 year olds burden in life to protect an adult. They need to take their own precautions
This post was edited on 7/23/21 at 8:40 am
Posted on 7/23/21 at 8:39 am to lsupride87
We’ve ruined our world over old and fat people because China fricked up.
Posted on 7/23/21 at 8:40 am to Salmon
quote:
and outdoors is safer than in.
It blows my mind that people are even talking about a virus and being outdoors.
Posted on 7/23/21 at 8:40 am to Salmon
quote:
“Kids do fine with masks.
What world do these idiots live in?
quote:
They’re vulnerable and want to get back to hanging out with friends. Masking will allow them to do that.”
They're not vulnerable, this sentence is totally contradicted by this entire article. This is bizarre that people don't notice this.
Posted on 7/23/21 at 8:41 am to CatfishJohn
quote:
But I think their argument is to mask kids mainly to stop the spread so it doesn't reach more people in more vulnerable groups.
THEN THOSE PEOPLE SHOULD GET THE VACCINNE!
Christ why is this so fricking hard!? If you are afraid of it, get the shot so the rest of the goddamned world can go on living.
Posted on 7/23/21 at 8:44 am to lsupride87
I'll say this as a vaccinated person, a person that believes in ultimate vaccine choice, a person that thinks the vaccine is very safe, and a parent of an 8 yr old.
Anyone that gives this vaccine to a child under the age of 18 (and at that point the individual's choice kicks is) should be evaluated for clinical insanity. It is simply a nuisance for most children that get it. The hospitalization and death numbers for that age group bear that out. I don't worry about my unvaccinated daughter going anywhere unmasked and unvaccinated....this includes school, camp, etc.
When I hear that dumbass doctor from BR on JBE press conference last week say she would put her sub-16 year old child into a clinical trial for the vaccine if it came for BR I about lost my shite.....it that happens her child should be taken by DCFS.....I mean who willingly puts their child in a situation that has any chance (even .00000001%) to kill them. I certainly could not do it.
Anyone that gives this vaccine to a child under the age of 18 (and at that point the individual's choice kicks is) should be evaluated for clinical insanity. It is simply a nuisance for most children that get it. The hospitalization and death numbers for that age group bear that out. I don't worry about my unvaccinated daughter going anywhere unmasked and unvaccinated....this includes school, camp, etc.
When I hear that dumbass doctor from BR on JBE press conference last week say she would put her sub-16 year old child into a clinical trial for the vaccine if it came for BR I about lost my shite.....it that happens her child should be taken by DCFS.....I mean who willingly puts their child in a situation that has any chance (even .00000001%) to kill them. I certainly could not do it.
Posted on 7/23/21 at 8:44 am to CatfishJohn
quote:
First, I agree masking kids is dumb as frick.
But I think their argument is to mask kids mainly to stop the spread so it doesn't reach more people in more vulnerable groups.
It's all dumb because those people have every chance to get vaccinated.
Is it then a toddler's responsibility to mask up during flu season to protect other toddler's & the elderly? Is it their responsibility to mask up during RSV season to protect those under 2?
Like you said, it's pretty dumb because anyone this is at risk has had the opportunity to take proactive measures to protect themselves. Sadly, most people think the only avenue is the vaccine; however, if they don't address their comorbidities the vaccine will only be able to go so far to protect them
Posted on 7/23/21 at 8:44 am to Salmon
quote:remember the next time you vote which party wants to muzzle your children, remember which party fought to pull your kids out of school
Salmon
Remember that.
Posted on 7/23/21 at 8:45 am to cable
quote:
We’ve ruined our world over old and fat people because China fricked up.
Saying they fricked up implies they made a mistake. Considering they are getting what they wanted, did they make a mistake?
Posted on 7/23/21 at 8:46 am to lsupride87
quote:
remember the next time you vote which party wants to muzzle your children, remember which party fought to pull your kids out of school
Remember that.
Not saying it directed at Salmon, but most people won't do that.
Posted on 7/23/21 at 8:46 am to lsupride87
quote:
Not yelling at you, but I’m going to yell at people that have that opinion
It’s not my 3 year old and 5 year olds burden in life to protect an adult. They need to take their own precautions
I 100% agree. I'm just clarifying what I think they're arguing in the article. I'm not masking my kids.
Posted on 7/23/21 at 8:48 am to lsupride87
quote:
remember the next time you vote which party wants to muzzle your children, remember which party fought to pull your kids out of school
Remember that.
you people really have no idea my voting habits
I've voted for a "D" twice in my life, and both have been for super local positions for people that I actually knew (one was my neighbor) and neither were anything close to progressive Democrats
I've voted "R" the vast majority of my life, with "L" and "I" sprinkled in here and there
Posted on 7/23/21 at 8:48 am to lsuhunt555
quote:
THEN THOSE PEOPLE SHOULD GET THE VACCINNE!
I agree.
Literally my next sentence in the post everyone refused to finish reading:
quote:
It's all dumb because those people have every chance to get vaccinated.
Posted on 7/23/21 at 8:48 am to CatfishJohn
quote:
But I think their argument is to mask kids mainly to stop the spread so it doesn't reach more people in more vulnerable groups.
With the option for those people to get vaccinated that argument goes out the window. I'm all for ultimate vaccine choice, but in that choice you have to consider that no other group is going to take any "mitigation measures" to protect you. You can now protect yourself.
Posted on 7/23/21 at 8:50 am to Salmon
quote:
frick that article. Forcing masks on kids triggers the frick out of me.
They also act like unmasking in schools is some uncharted territory even though there is a huge dataset from the shite ton of schools that had a normal school year last year with no masks.
Posted on 7/23/21 at 8:53 am to lsuhunt555
quote:
They're not vulnerable, this sentence is totally contradicted by this entire article. This is bizarre that people don't notice this.
This sounds like you're a Science denier. Why do you deny The Science?
Posted on 7/23/21 at 8:57 am to LSU316
quote:
With the option for those people to get vaccinated that argument goes out the window. I'm all for ultimate vaccine choice, but in that choice you have to consider that no other group is going to take any "mitigation measures" to protect you. You can now protect yourself.
Another poster that refused to actually read my post. My god guys. Im literally agreeing with all of you
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News