Started By
Message

re: Was the Byzantine empire Greek or Roman?

Posted on 3/26/20 at 5:46 pm to
Posted by Mike da Tigah
Bravo Romeo Lima Alpha
Member since Feb 2005
58857 posts
Posted on 3/26/20 at 5:46 pm to
Do you even Western Civ?
Posted by Ancient Astronaut
Member since May 2015
32923 posts
Posted on 3/26/20 at 5:51 pm to
Brb gonna go listen to dan Carlin so he can tell me how to become history expert!
Posted by PhilemonThomas
Member since Jan 2015
2942 posts
Posted on 3/26/20 at 5:59 pm to
That reminds me. I’m holding out hope that the based Greeks get tired of playing defense against the Turks and their migrants and mount an offensive to take back Constantinople.
Posted by soccerfüt
Location: A Series of Tubes
Member since May 2013
65517 posts
Posted on 3/26/20 at 6:01 pm to
quote:

I think they embraced a lot of the Greek culture.
^Owlie Bait comment
Posted by volod
Leesville, LA
Member since Jun 2014
5392 posts
Posted on 3/26/20 at 6:02 pm to
Byzantine Empire

Overly Sarcastic Production

It was Roman, but they significantly changed culturally.
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
64945 posts
Posted on 3/26/20 at 6:03 pm to
quote:

Ravenna.


You're right! And I had just read about that, too.

I had a brain fart and forgot about its move from Milan to Ravenna.

Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
64945 posts
Posted on 3/26/20 at 6:05 pm to
quote:

They weren’t an empire either.


They were under Charlemagne.



Posted by TutHillTiger
Mississippi Alabama
Member since Sep 2010
43700 posts
Posted on 3/26/20 at 6:06 pm to
Really kinda both, Roman law etc, but culture and religion were mostly Greek
Posted by OGtigerfan87
North La
Member since Feb 2019
3359 posts
Posted on 3/26/20 at 6:15 pm to
And many of the royals and elites were of Greek ancestry right?
Posted by Nature Boy
Negatiger
Member since Jan 2008
18977 posts
Posted on 3/26/20 at 6:20 pm to
They considered themselves Roman, but adapted a lot of the Greek culture (which was nothing new, even back in the western empire, since the aristocratic class had a lot of admiration for Greek culture). Even as huge chunks of Italy were sacked and ruled by others, there was a Roman/Byzantine presence in the area for hundreds of years after the ‘fall’ of the western empire. It took a very long time for most Byzantine leadership to realize the west was really gone, since they had small outposts and allies in the area.
Posted by Nature Boy
Negatiger
Member since Jan 2008
18977 posts
Posted on 3/26/20 at 6:25 pm to
quote:


And many of the royals and elites were of Greek ancestry right?


Not necessarily. Really there were Byzantine emperors from all over what we now call Eastern Europe. Lots of warfare between families, military figures, etc. constantly trying to gain control over Byzantium until there was nothing left.

There’s a really good podcast series about Byzantium. History of Byzantium. Look it up. Takes you all the way back to the ‘fall’ of the west and proceeds from there.
Posted by Apollyon
Member since Dec 2019
2124 posts
Posted on 3/26/20 at 6:28 pm to
Byzantium was heavily populated by those of macedon/greek lineage (look at the names)-- this is simple geography. Politically it was absolutely the Eastern empire of Rome and the only Roman Empire that existed after the west fell (research the dual Caesars of the diarchy). Byzantines considered themselves Roman, 100%.
Posted by OleWar
Troy H. Middleton Library
Member since Mar 2008
5828 posts
Posted on 3/26/20 at 6:42 pm to
I read a passage in a Greek(Hellenic) text, that during the Greko-Turkish War 1919-1920, A Greek (Hellenic) Soldier was posting guard in a village in Anatolia. A little girl was staring at him, and he asked what are you staring at. She told hem she had never seen a Greek (Hellen) before, in the Greek language. He asked what she was and she replied that she was Rhomaîos or a Roman.
Posted by LoneStarRanger
Texas/Europe
Member since Aug 2018
2404 posts
Posted on 3/26/20 at 7:09 pm to
Royalty didn’t work that way in the Byzantine Empire. It was more of aristocracy than nobility. There were many Bulgar, Thracian, Levantine, Anatolian emperors/ministers/governors.

It was sort of a brutal system where a military leader would often proclaim himself Emperor and then fight for the throne. Also many times, the Regent would effectively be Ruler and then kill off a child-emperor. Uncles would kill nephews for the throne and visce versa.

Then there was the Senate

Oh and at the end of the day, the mob (not organized crime) ruled. Often times if the people tired of the Emperor or a governor, they would overthrow them quickly. At the end of the day, it was oddly a government with the consent of the people
Posted by MBclass83
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
9345 posts
Posted on 3/26/20 at 7:10 pm to
I don't know the answer to the question. But I have a question. If Spain attacked Italy from the rear, would Greece help?
Posted by Soup Sammich
Member since Aug 2015
3301 posts
Posted on 3/26/20 at 7:21 pm to
quote:

I don't know the answer to the question. But I have a question. If Spain attacked Italy from the rear, would Greece help?


Greece always helps. They will be the key to exploring the outer solar system planets like Uranus.
Posted by TBoy
Kalamazoo
Member since Dec 2007
23645 posts
Posted on 3/26/20 at 7:22 pm to
Turkish?
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram