Started By
Message

re: Was the 727 the best-looking plane (edit) "airliner" designed at its time?

Posted on 6/21/22 at 10:46 pm to
Posted by UAinSOUTHAL
Mobile,AL
Member since Dec 2012
5102 posts
Posted on 6/21/22 at 10:46 pm to
I personally can’t wait to see the new Air Force One’s. They should be ready for some flight tests late 2023-24
Posted by LSUJuice
Back in Houston
Member since Apr 2004
17934 posts
Posted on 6/21/22 at 10:59 pm to
For a narrow body, give me the 757. Maybe it's the length (twss )




Posted by bhtigerfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
32400 posts
Posted on 6/21/22 at 11:09 pm to
I’ve actually flown this exact airplane.

Posted by HubbaBubba
North of DFW, TX
Member since Oct 2010
48869 posts
Posted on 6/21/22 at 11:41 pm to
quote:

I was always partial to the L-1011 since it was the first plane I flew on and it was huge compared to the 727, which was the second plane I flew on as a kid.
Flew to Rio on an L10-11. It was my favorite airline. It was quiet, nine seats to a row and they were comfy, and a lower galley. That plane also was first fly by wire aircraft.
Posted by AlwysATgr
Member since Apr 2008
19063 posts
Posted on 6/21/22 at 11:47 pm to
quote:

I was always partial to the L-1011 since it was the first plane I flew on and it was huge compared to the 727, which was the second plane I flew on as a kid.


An L-1011 was the first wide body I flew on and it was sweet. Not sure why Lockheed stopped making them.
Posted by RockinDood
Member since Aug 2020
1013 posts
Posted on 6/22/22 at 12:11 am to
quote:

Was the 727 the best-looking plane (edit) "airliner" designed at its time?


Hmm that’s a close one. I always liked the tri-jets! The obvious upward thrust line on the pylon mounted engines caught my attention.
Posted by DesScorp
Alabama
Member since Sep 2017
8497 posts
Posted on 6/22/22 at 3:18 am to
quote:

L-1011 was the first wide body I flew on and it was sweet. Not sure why Lockheed stopped making them.


They were losing money. McDonnell Douglas beat them to market with the DC-10, and in retrospect, the market for three engine widebodies wasn’t big enough for both.
Posted by Fat and Happy
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2013
18648 posts
Posted on 6/22/22 at 5:58 am to
A-10 Warthog
Posted by CaptainsWafer
TD Platinum Member
Member since Feb 2006
58788 posts
Posted on 6/22/22 at 6:05 am to
quote:

interesting topic since the industry has moved away from rear power units.


Why is that?
Posted by OSqueal
Member since Jan 2011
5791 posts
Posted on 6/22/22 at 7:41 am to
They added a latch on the outside that would actuate when in motion to not allow the stairs to be lowered in flight. I heard it called the DB Cooper latch.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
92569 posts
Posted on 6/22/22 at 8:28 am to
quote:

Why is that?



The cost of operation and the main advantages of the 3-engine configuration (whether 1 or 3 in the tail) are all gone now.
Posted by Tigeralum2008
Yankees Fan
Member since Apr 2012
17435 posts
Posted on 6/22/22 at 8:31 am to
I'm partial to the piston engine era myself.

My Favorite is the Boeing 314...Pan-Am's "Clipper of the Sky"





Posted by jcaz
Laffy
Member since Aug 2014
17687 posts
Posted on 6/22/22 at 8:31 am to
They were loud that’s all I know.
FedEx used to fly them out of LFT as recently as 2012. Every night I thought we were under attack. No hush kits installed on these bad boys
Posted by Hangover Haven
Metry
Member since Oct 2013
29892 posts
Posted on 6/22/22 at 8:40 am to
Am I seeing that correct? Is that a person in the engine bay? Why?


Posted by 777Tiger
Member since Mar 2011
83326 posts
Posted on 6/22/22 at 8:42 am to
quote:

They were loud that’s all I know.



very loud, very macho, and pretty fast for an airliner
Posted by RedFoxx
New Orleans, LA
Member since Jan 2009
6468 posts
Posted on 6/22/22 at 8:47 am to
quote:

They added a latch on the outside that would actuate when in motion to not allow the stairs to be lowered in flight. I heard it called the DB Cooper latch


Cooper Vane
Posted by Tigeralum2008
Yankees Fan
Member since Apr 2012
17435 posts
Posted on 6/22/22 at 8:49 am to
quote:

Am I seeing that correct? Is that a person in the engine bay? Why?



quote:

Among the technical innovations pioneered by the B-314 were the fully-feathering propellers insisted upon by Pan Am Chief Engineer Andre Priester. And important safety feature which would be incorporated in virtually all subsequent variable-pitch propellers, the full-feathering props also allowed mechanics to take advantage of the B-314’s unparalleled in-flight engine access made possible by the wing’s thick chord. The 314’s wing was thick enough to allow access through a walkway to the engines in flight, where the fully-feathering props made it possible for a mechanic to perform repairs in flight. Between June, 1939 and June, 1941, 431 in-flight engine repairs were performed by B-314 engineers.
Posted by NWarty
Somewhere in the PNW
Member since Sep 2013
2181 posts
Posted on 6/22/22 at 8:49 am to
I was a Ramp Rat for Delta one summer during college and worked Concourses A & B at KATL. The baggage holds on the 727’s we’re covered in Sharpie graffiti, some much older than I was. This was 1994. Best summer job ever.
Posted by 777Tiger
Member since Mar 2011
83326 posts
Posted on 6/22/22 at 8:52 am to
quote:

Am I seeing that correct? Is that a person in the engine bay? Why?


yep, the flight engineer/mechanic could access the engines in flight for repairs, oil servicing, etc. those big old radials could suck up some oil, them
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram