- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Was the 727 the best-looking plane (edit) "airliner" designed at its time?
Posted on 6/21/22 at 10:46 pm to Baw Vivant
Posted on 6/21/22 at 10:46 pm to Baw Vivant
I personally can’t wait to see the new Air Force One’s. They should be ready for some flight tests late 2023-24
Posted on 6/21/22 at 10:59 pm to Hangover Haven
For a narrow body, give me the 757. Maybe it's the length (twss
)




Posted on 6/21/22 at 11:09 pm to Hangover Haven
I’ve actually flown this exact airplane.



Posted on 6/21/22 at 11:41 pm to Mike da Tigah
quote:Flew to Rio on an L10-11. It was my favorite airline. It was quiet, nine seats to a row and they were comfy, and a lower galley. That plane also was first fly by wire aircraft.
I was always partial to the L-1011 since it was the first plane I flew on and it was huge compared to the 727, which was the second plane I flew on as a kid.
Posted on 6/21/22 at 11:47 pm to Mike da Tigah
quote:
I was always partial to the L-1011 since it was the first plane I flew on and it was huge compared to the 727, which was the second plane I flew on as a kid.
An L-1011 was the first wide body I flew on and it was sweet. Not sure why Lockheed stopped making them.
Posted on 6/22/22 at 12:11 am to Hangover Haven
quote:
Was the 727 the best-looking plane (edit) "airliner" designed at its time?
Hmm that’s a close one. I always liked the tri-jets! The obvious upward thrust line on the pylon mounted engines caught my attention.
Posted on 6/22/22 at 3:18 am to AlwysATgr
quote:
L-1011 was the first wide body I flew on and it was sweet. Not sure why Lockheed stopped making them.
They were losing money. McDonnell Douglas beat them to market with the DC-10, and in retrospect, the market for three engine widebodies wasn’t big enough for both.
Posted on 6/22/22 at 6:05 am to billjamin
quote:
interesting topic since the industry has moved away from rear power units.
Why is that?
Posted on 6/22/22 at 7:41 am to mtntiger
They added a latch on the outside that would actuate when in motion to not allow the stairs to be lowered in flight. I heard it called the DB Cooper latch.
Posted on 6/22/22 at 8:28 am to CaptainsWafer
quote:
Why is that?
The cost of operation and the main advantages of the 3-engine configuration (whether 1 or 3 in the tail) are all gone now.
Posted on 6/22/22 at 8:31 am to Hangover Haven
I'm partial to the piston engine era myself.
My Favorite is the Boeing 314...Pan-Am's "Clipper of the Sky"

My Favorite is the Boeing 314...Pan-Am's "Clipper of the Sky"



Posted on 6/22/22 at 8:31 am to Hangover Haven
They were loud that’s all I know.
FedEx used to fly them out of LFT as recently as 2012. Every night I thought we were under attack. No hush kits installed on these bad boys
FedEx used to fly them out of LFT as recently as 2012. Every night I thought we were under attack. No hush kits installed on these bad boys
Posted on 6/22/22 at 8:40 am to Tigeralum2008
Am I seeing that correct? Is that a person in the engine bay? Why?

Posted on 6/22/22 at 8:42 am to jcaz
quote:
They were loud that’s all I know.
very loud, very macho, and pretty fast for an airliner

Posted on 6/22/22 at 8:47 am to OSqueal
quote:
They added a latch on the outside that would actuate when in motion to not allow the stairs to be lowered in flight. I heard it called the DB Cooper latch
Cooper Vane
Posted on 6/22/22 at 8:49 am to Hangover Haven
quote:
Am I seeing that correct? Is that a person in the engine bay? Why?
quote:
Among the technical innovations pioneered by the B-314 were the fully-feathering propellers insisted upon by Pan Am Chief Engineer Andre Priester. And important safety feature which would be incorporated in virtually all subsequent variable-pitch propellers, the full-feathering props also allowed mechanics to take advantage of the B-314’s unparalleled in-flight engine access made possible by the wing’s thick chord. The 314’s wing was thick enough to allow access through a walkway to the engines in flight, where the fully-feathering props made it possible for a mechanic to perform repairs in flight. Between June, 1939 and June, 1941, 431 in-flight engine repairs were performed by B-314 engineers.
Posted on 6/22/22 at 8:49 am to Hangover Haven
I was a Ramp Rat for Delta one summer during college and worked Concourses A & B at KATL. The baggage holds on the 727’s we’re covered in Sharpie graffiti, some much older than I was. This was 1994. Best summer job ever.
Posted on 6/22/22 at 8:52 am to Hangover Haven
quote:
Am I seeing that correct? Is that a person in the engine bay? Why?
yep, the flight engineer/mechanic could access the engines in flight for repairs, oil servicing, etc. those big old radials could suck up some oil, them
Back to top
