Started By
Message

re: Violent crime dropped an estimated 3% in the United States last year, FBI crime data shows

Posted on 9/23/24 at 12:32 pm to
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
61751 posts
Posted on 9/23/24 at 12:32 pm to
quote:

weakness" is subjectively changing whether data is real or fraudulent based along the spectrum of what the person wants the data to say.


No, weakness is demanding that all datasets be viewed as either valid or all viewed as invalid and ignoring the actual examples of problems with data reporting.

That’s you.

It’s a very logical and plausible possibility that the spike in crime led to the manipulation of the data to achieve a desired result.

More importantly people have a lived experience. They know that crime is not decreasing. Every day they see crimes expanding into areas that used to be safe.
Posted by SeeeeK
some where
Member since Sep 2012
30508 posts
Posted on 9/23/24 at 12:32 pm to
Sure clark

Those are numbers after cities cheery pick thru them. Not factual numbers.

#FactsoverurFeelings
Posted by Gaggle
Member since Oct 2021
7286 posts
Posted on 9/23/24 at 12:33 pm to
quote:

You're trying to argue it's perfect data
No, YOU are.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
464968 posts
Posted on 9/23/24 at 12:34 pm to
quote:

Brain rot is thinking you can only have notions based on government numbers that are easily manipulated

This is literally what the doom casters are using to say crime is spiking

That and "common sense" silliness.

quote:

A normal person knows which parts of town are high crime and to avoid, they know when things get better or worse, and they do this without knowing the numbers.

This would only be a point if the numbers disagreed in your metaphor

Update: they do not
Posted by BZ504
Texas
Member since Oct 2005
12658 posts
Posted on 9/23/24 at 12:34 pm to
If the FBI said it, then it’s true.
Posted by lsufan1971
Zachary
Member since Nov 2003
23573 posts
Posted on 9/23/24 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

You don't have to trust them. You can look up the data on these cities yourself. I have for like 4+ cities in this thread alone.


You mean like NOPD?
quote:

The New Orleans Police Department under-counted sex crime data that was furnished to the FBI for its national reporting program for the years 2021 and 2022, department officials said on Tuesday.



quote:

Civil rights attorney Mary Howell and a researcher flagged a stark discrepancy between the number of aggravated and simple rapes NOPD furnished in weekly reports and those contained in year-end reports, and a stark and inconsistent drop in rapes reported from 2020 to 2022.


quote:

But advocates say the under-count may already have prevented Louisiana from getting its due of federal funds that are calculated based on population, the share of state crime reported in a district, and the crime rate within the district, according to a September letter from the city's Office of Criminal Justice Coordination.

LINK
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
464968 posts
Posted on 9/23/24 at 12:36 pm to
quote:

No, weakness is demanding that all datasets be viewed as either valid or all viewed as invalid a

That is using their logic, not mine.

You're confusing their bad logic and applying me showing why it's bad, as me making their logical leaps.

I am glad you agree that their logic is bad.

quote:

It’s a very logical and plausible possibility that the spike in crime led to the manipulation of the data to achieve a desired result.

Why would the result be desirable?

The follow up will be: why did they let this undesirable spike to occur in the first place? All they had to do was lie.

quote:

More importantly people have a lived experience. They know that crime is not decreasing. Every day they see crimes expanding into areas that used to be safe.

Exactly the same arguments used to say the 80s were safe than pre-Covid America. EXACTLY. I've heard all of this silliness for years.
Posted by Gaggle
Member since Oct 2021
7286 posts
Posted on 9/23/24 at 12:37 pm to
quote:

This is literally what the doom casters are using to say crime is spiking
No, you're using them to say crime is falling
quote:

This would only be a point if the numbers disagreed in your metaphor Update: they do not
A point? Update: your numbers do disagree with my notion
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
464968 posts
Posted on 9/23/24 at 12:37 pm to
quote:

You mean like NOPD?


Yes. I posted the data earlier. Violent crime is decreasing.

quote:

The New Orleans Police Department under-counted sex crime data that was furnished to the FBI

So had Nola been included, the FBI data would show even less crime.

I don't think this is the argument you're trying to make
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
464968 posts
Posted on 9/23/24 at 12:38 pm to
quote:

No, you're using them to say crime is falling

From a spike, which was based on "notions based on government numbers that are easily manipulated"
Posted by lsufan1971
Zachary
Member since Nov 2003
23573 posts
Posted on 9/23/24 at 12:41 pm to
Your argument is trust the data. NOPD has been fricking terrible at reporting crime data. Most major cities are terrible at it. Houston has a big problem right now with thousands of cases never being turned over to the DA's office.

My counter argument to yours was trust the cities that are reporting. I didn't say trust because its falling. The data being reported is flawed plain and simple.

Go read the Marshall project article on it.

quote:

In Florida, however, only 49 of the state’s more than 500 agencies submitted data to the FBI last year, representing less than 8% of the state’s police departments. Some of the largest agencies, like the Miami Police Department, the Pinellas County Sheriff’s Office, and the St. Petersburg Police Department, are missing from the national context.


quote:

When the FBI released its 2021 national crime data last fall, it couldn’t say if crime went up, went down, or stayed the same. The FBI concluded that all three scenarios could be possible because of the gaps in the data collection.


LINK

This post was edited on 9/23/24 at 12:47 pm
Posted by CamdenTiger
Member since Aug 2009
65116 posts
Posted on 9/23/24 at 12:43 pm to
lol, everyone is lying to us
Posted by Gaggle
Member since Oct 2021
7286 posts
Posted on 9/23/24 at 12:45 pm to
The spike was observed and continues, regardless of the numbers. Congratulations that it perhaps kind of matched for a little while. You are now arguing your own numbers, which you presented as the FACTS and DATA, are useless in order to set a a logical trap and win the argument. Please, abandon your entire notion in order to win the logical point. You win, all the numbers are useless including the spike. So we will just discuss our anecdotal echo chamber observations and you admittedly can't have notions or participate. Congratulations again.
This post was edited on 9/23/24 at 12:46 pm
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
464968 posts
Posted on 9/23/24 at 12:45 pm to
quote:

Your argument is trust the data. NOPD has been fricking terrible at reporting crime data. Most major cities are terrible at it. Houston has a big problem right now with thousands of cases never being turned over to the DA's office.


Well since we can't rely on the data, then there was no spike, either.

See how that works? You don't get to only proclaim data legitimate when it conforms to your preconceived notions, and then discard any data that refutes them.
Posted by Tigahs24Seven
Charlie Kirk's America
Member since Nov 2007
14405 posts
Posted on 9/23/24 at 12:47 pm to
How stupid do these spooks think we are..?
We are the ones driving around with guns on our persons to protect our families from these "decreased crime numbers", drug zombies, and homeless beggers...
Bullcrap.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
464968 posts
Posted on 9/23/24 at 12:47 pm to
quote:

The spike was observed and continues, regardless of the numbers.

And so is the decrease.

quote:

You are now arguing your own numbers, which you presented as the FACTS and DATA, are useless in order to set a a logical trap and win the argument.

I am not.

Don't confuse me showing your "logic" is silly with me adopting your "logic".

quote:

You win, all the numbers are useless including the spike.

That's your argument based on your "logic"

I'm not the one attacking the data. You are.

Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
149387 posts
Posted on 9/23/24 at 12:48 pm to
quote:

This is literally what the doom casters are using to say crime is spiking
statistics are legitimate when they back up what I want to be true

When they don't? They are manipulated or don't matter or don't capture the full picture
This post was edited on 9/23/24 at 12:49 pm
Posted by Gaggle
Member since Oct 2021
7286 posts
Posted on 9/23/24 at 12:49 pm to
quote:

And so is the decrease.
You said you couldn't do observations
quote:

I'm not the one attacking the data. You are.
But you are, you attacked the data of the spike when it was pointed out the many ways the data is manipulatable
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
464968 posts
Posted on 9/23/24 at 12:50 pm to
quote:

statistics are legitimate when they back up what I want to be true

When they don't? They are manipulated or don't matter or don't capture the full picture


Correct.

Also don't forget my most recent axiom: when the data proves my argument wrong, I'll just add another layer to the conspiracy
Posted by lsufan1971
Zachary
Member since Nov 2003
23573 posts
Posted on 9/23/24 at 12:50 pm to
quote:

See how that works? You don't get to only proclaim data legitimate when it conforms to your preconceived notions, and then discard any data that refutes them.


You aren't reading what I am saying. My argument is that the data is flawed. That is my argument. You narrative is that its not and we should accept the data even though its been shown to be incomplete and inaccurate.

The NIBRS reporting system is overly complicated and has too many error reporting failures. My old system had 120K lines of handwritten code just to catch the reporting errors.
This post was edited on 9/23/24 at 12:51 pm
Jump to page
Page First 5 6 7 8 9 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram