- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
US Supreme Court decides business owner can cater to who he/she wants
Posted on 6/4/18 at 10:10 pm
Posted on 6/4/18 at 10:10 pm
Does that include smokers? Is the ban invalidated?
11
Posted on 6/4/18 at 10:11 pm to magildachunks
quote:
US Supreme Court decides business owner can cater to who he/she wants
That isn’t what happened.
Posted on 6/4/18 at 10:11 pm to magildachunks
I think it was pretty targeted to this case. I agree with the ruling though.
Posted on 6/4/18 at 10:11 pm to magildachunks
That’s not what was decided.
Posted on 6/4/18 at 10:11 pm to magildachunks
That wasn't anything close to what the Supreme Court opinion said.
Posted on 6/4/18 at 10:11 pm to magildachunks
How is this different than the bakery case? So basically a business and deny anyone they want? Like it should be?
Posted on 6/4/18 at 10:12 pm to magildachunks
Smokers can now light’em if they got’em.
You are correct.
You are correct.
Posted on 6/4/18 at 10:12 pm to TH03
quote:
That isn’t what happened.
Posted on 6/4/18 at 10:12 pm to TH03
quote:
That isn’t what happened.
In the big picture though: isn't it?
Posted on 6/4/18 at 10:12 pm to magildachunks
Correct.
Light up. Now.
Light up. Now.
Posted on 6/4/18 at 10:12 pm to magildachunks
Not at all. It was very specific to this case.
Posted on 6/4/18 at 10:13 pm to TH03
Do you precedent?
Posted on 6/4/18 at 10:14 pm to TH03
quote:
Not at all. It was very specific to this case.
It could be used as precedence in future cases though. Admittedly I haven't read the final decision
Posted on 6/4/18 at 10:14 pm to magildachunks
Is smoking cigs your religion?
Posted on 6/4/18 at 10:15 pm to pwejr88
quote:
Do you precedent?
They went out of their way to not set precedent with that decision.
Posted on 6/4/18 at 10:15 pm to TH03
quote:
Not at all. It was very specific to this case.
Roe vs Wade was specific to that case, but could still be used as precedent for others.
Like seat belt laws. The government has no right to tell you what to do with your body.
Always wanted to argue a seat belt ticket with Roe vs. Wade.
Posted on 6/4/18 at 10:16 pm to magildachunks
what does the German Supreme Court have to do with the United States?
Posted on 6/4/18 at 10:16 pm to pwejr88
quote:
Do you precedent?
Yes. Now please read the opinion and tell me how this decision can be used in the future in the manner in which the OP is speaking.
Posted on 6/4/18 at 10:16 pm to magildachunks
quote:
Always wanted to argue a seat belt ticket with Roe vs. Wade.
Well, now you can. While you’re smoking a cigarette.
Posted on 6/4/18 at 10:17 pm to Jack Daniel
quote:
Is smoking cigs your religion?
I have Cherokee blood.
So...kind of.
Peace pipe bitch.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News