Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 14
Started By
Message

US Military Vs Civilians

Posted on 10/4/17 at 9:18 am
Posted by Thib-a-doe Tiger
Member since Nov 2012
35346 posts
Posted on 10/4/17 at 9:18 am
Probably been covered, but it has come up again in light of recent events and gun grabber rhetoric


Who wins?


US Military - 2 million

Roughly 60 millions households have at least one weapon. Over 300 million registered gun in civilian hands


ETA: it is unlikely to ever happen, and I hope it doesn't
This post was edited on 10/4/17 at 9:19 am
Posted by 50_Tiger
Dallas TX
Member since Jan 2016
39978 posts
Posted on 10/4/17 at 9:19 am to
2 million coordinated with the best technology you dont know about.

US Military x 10000
Posted by LSU_Saints_Hornets
Uptown NO,LA
Member since Jan 2013
9739 posts
Posted on 10/4/17 at 9:19 am to
quote:

US Military Vs Civilians


quote:

Who wins?


Nobody.
Posted by SidewalkDawg
Chair
Member since Nov 2012
9820 posts
Posted on 10/4/17 at 9:19 am to
quote:

Who wins?


The Jews.
Posted by Pettifogger
Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Member since Feb 2012
79117 posts
Posted on 10/4/17 at 9:20 am to
That's why we need the tactical flashlights, obvs
Posted by CarRamrod
Spurbury, VT
Member since Dec 2006
57426 posts
Posted on 10/4/17 at 9:20 am to
If it came down to it, the Military would coup the government.
Posted by robertLSU
Florida
Member since Jan 2013
429 posts
Posted on 10/4/17 at 9:20 am to
The people with tanks
Posted by Thib-a-doe Tiger
Member since Nov 2012
35346 posts
Posted on 10/4/17 at 9:20 am to
quote:

f it came down to it, the Military would coup the government.





I agree with this
Posted by NYCAuburn
TD Platinum Membership/SECr Sheriff
Member since Feb 2011
57002 posts
Posted on 10/4/17 at 9:20 am to
quote:

Roughly 60 millions households have at least one weapon. Over 300 million registered gun in civilian hands


Yes, but military weapons>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Civilian guns


I probably could have added a few more ">"
Posted by OysterPoBoy
City of St. George
Member since Jul 2013
34988 posts
Posted on 10/4/17 at 9:21 am to
Military will be tied up in sexual harassment training while all the baws are gearing up. Baws win.
Posted by hg
Member since Jun 2009
123590 posts
Posted on 10/4/17 at 9:21 am to
Seriously?
Posted by ForkEmDemons
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since May 2014
2235 posts
Posted on 10/4/17 at 9:21 am to
US Military and it won't be even close.

Our weapons are no match for this:

Posted by Thib-a-doe Tiger
Member since Nov 2012
35346 posts
Posted on 10/4/17 at 9:23 am to
quote:

Yes, but military weapons>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Civilian guns



I don't believe this. They have some things, like full auto, available that most civilians don't. But I would bet many of the civilian owned AR's are light years ahead of the average lowest bidder Military AR.


The Military does have bombs and shite tho
This post was edited on 10/4/17 at 9:26 am
Posted by TheGasMan
Member since Oct 2014
3136 posts
Posted on 10/4/17 at 9:23 am to
quote:

ForkEmDemons

If the military is using F-14s they have bigger problems...

Those have been retired for over a decade baw.
Posted by Packer
IE, California
Member since May 2017
7792 posts
Posted on 10/4/17 at 9:23 am to
quote:

Yes, but military weapons>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Civilian guns



Drones, tanks, and missiles >>>> rednecks in pick up trucks with shotguns
Posted by dfintlyHmmrd
Jigga City
Member since Dec 2016
1408 posts
Posted on 10/4/17 at 9:23 am to
quote:

US Military x 10000


Exactly, the idea that a bunch of inbred country bumpkins could stop trained professional and very well equipped soldiers because they hunt and shoot all the time is a fricking pipe dream.
Posted by Thib-a-doe Tiger
Member since Nov 2012
35346 posts
Posted on 10/4/17 at 9:24 am to
quote:

Exactly, the idea that a bunch of inbred country bumpkins could stop trained professional and very well equipped soldiers because they hunt and shoot all the time is a fricking pipe dream.



Many of the country bumpkins you speak of are former military. Not to mention in the scenario posed, many current Military would jump ship


I think the government would win, but it would not be the cakewalk most think
Posted by TigerDog83
Member since Oct 2005
8274 posts
Posted on 10/4/17 at 9:24 am to
quote:

Our weapons are no match for this:


Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan all tend to lend evidence against your assertion. Afghanistan involves primitive cave dwelling insurgents with limited weapons and no air power and outside powers have yet to beat or control them.
Posted by TheAlmightySmash
New Orleans
Member since Jun 2014
5479 posts
Posted on 10/4/17 at 9:27 am to
It would be a good fight
Posted by colorchangintiger
Dan Carlin
Member since Nov 2005
30979 posts
Posted on 10/4/17 at 9:29 am to
quote:

Who wins?


So many unknown variables to really know. If it's straight up Military vs Civilians then the military would roll over civilians worse than the Iraqi military. In reality though, some significant portion of the military would defect and other countries would get involved with support for civilians and troops of their own.
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 14
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 14Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram