- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 2/11/14 at 4:03 pm to REG861
I love the "'merica frick yea" crowd that suddenly despises the American system when they disagree with it.
I'm sure you'd want your defense attorney and the jury to consider all facts and angles when determining the rest of your life. And if you aren't a complete retard, should appreciate that there has to be someone who will do it for you, according to our laws, including the Constitution.
I'm sure you'd want your defense attorney and the jury to consider all facts and angles when determining the rest of your life. And if you aren't a complete retard, should appreciate that there has to be someone who will do it for you, according to our laws, including the Constitution.
Posted on 2/11/14 at 4:08 pm to TheIndulger
quote:
Nathan Crowson
Posted on 2/11/14 at 4:08 pm to GRTiger
quote:We must be reading different threads because I haven't seen anyone say that he shouldn't get a trial or be defended.
I love the "'merica frick yea" crowd that suddenly despises the American system when they disagree with it
Posted on 2/11/14 at 4:12 pm to Grit-Eating Shin
So people want a defense and to call those who provide that defense scum bags? GTFO
By bashing the attorney, you are implying you disagree with the job he was tasked with. That job of course being providing a criminal defense in court. So, it's either un-American or hypocritical to slander the attorney. I don't care which some of you identify with.
By bashing the attorney, you are implying you disagree with the job he was tasked with. That job of course being providing a criminal defense in court. So, it's either un-American or hypocritical to slander the attorney. I don't care which some of you identify with.
Posted on 2/11/14 at 4:14 pm to TheIndulger
I'm not overly familiar with this incident.. What time were the riding.. Were they in the street? Guy probably deserves time but degrees of fault should play into time sentenced
And to the dumbasses calling out the defense attorney.. Pick up and move to a country where one isn't presumed innocent, one where the defense is given no opportunity.. The gulags await.
And to the dumbasses calling out the defense attorney.. Pick up and move to a country where one isn't presumed innocent, one where the defense is given no opportunity.. The gulags await.
Posted on 2/11/14 at 4:18 pm to Grit-Eating Shin
quote:
No shite. Doesn't mean he's not a complete degenerate scumbag.
he has an obligation as such to raise every possible defense.
So are you saying all lawyers are scumbags?
should no one represent him?
should he even get a trial?
Posted on 2/11/14 at 4:20 pm to TROLA
quote:
And to the dumbasses calling out the defense attorney.. Pick up and move to a country where one isn't presumed innocent, one where the defense is given no opportunity.. The gulags await.
Posted on 2/11/14 at 4:20 pm to GRTiger
quote:This is horrendous logic. Don't hurt yourself with that reach.
By bashing the attorney, you are implying you disagree with the job he was tasked with.
It's the idea that he's attempting to blame the victims when it's so abundantly clear that his client is at fault that makes him a POS. I was on a jury in federal court and actually like the defense attorney better than the prosecution...but his client was still guilty as shite.
quote:
un-American
Posted on 2/11/14 at 4:22 pm to Grit-Eating Shin
quote:
His lawyer should get life for making such a dumb fricking assertion
Do you even Constitution bro?
Posted on 2/11/14 at 4:22 pm to Grit-Eating Shin
I agree with what was said - like it or not, a defense attorney has a legal and ethical obligation to defend his client to the best of his ability, even if his defenses might seem weak, somewhat silly, or even "chicken shite".
Posted on 2/11/14 at 4:23 pm to Grit-Eating Shin
quote:
Grit-Eating Shin
You obviously dont know what an Attorney's duty is to his client.
Posted on 2/11/14 at 4:24 pm to Grit-Eating Shin
quote:
His lawyer should get life for making such a dumb fricking assertion. Seriously, frick that piece of shite.
What else would you like a defense attorney to do?
Posted on 2/11/14 at 4:25 pm to MasterofTigerBait
quote:So, what? I still think he's a POS for even remotely insinuating that the victims are at fault because they smoked weed sometime within the past month. It isn't as if they had pockets full of drugs.
he has an obligation as such to raise every possible defense.
quote:You are drawing some ridiculous conclusions.
So are you saying all lawyers are scumbags?
should no one represent him?
should he even get a trial?
Posted on 2/11/14 at 4:26 pm to tigerpimpbot
quote:Do you even hyperbole, bruh?
Do you even Constitution bro?
Posted on 2/11/14 at 4:27 pm to Grit-Eating Shin
quote:
still think he's a POS for even remotely insinuating that the victims are at fault
Agreed. It's asinine.
Posted on 2/11/14 at 4:27 pm to Grit-Eating Shin
quote:
This is horrendous logic. Don't hurt yourself with that reach.
My logic is flawed? You are displaying the logic of being for defense trials while claiming those who provide that defense should be put in jail as well. That's literally too stupid to discuss.
quote:
It's the idea that he's attempting to blame the victims when it's so abundantly clear that his client is at fault that makes him a POS. I was on a jury in federal court and actually like the defense attorney better than the prosecution...but his client was still guilty as shite.
That's his fricking job, you fool. It's the jury's job to rule based on the arguments presented, and the judge's job to ensure factual arguments are presented for jury consumption.
It's terrifying that people like you are on juries.
Posted on 2/11/14 at 4:27 pm to Paul Allen
quote:You un-American terrorist sympathizer.
Agreed. It's asinine.
Posted on 2/11/14 at 4:31 pm to GRTiger
quote:Holy shite...are you dumb enough to think there wasn't just a tinge of hyperbole in there? Wow...
while claiming those who provide that defense should be put in jail as well.
quote:Here's the part where you show us where I said he wasn't allowed to defend his client. Go on...we'll wait.
That's his fricking job, you fool. It's the jury's job to rule based on the arguments presented, and the judge's job to ensure factual arguments are presented for jury consumption.
Posted on 2/11/14 at 4:32 pm to Grit-Eating Shin
quote:
So, what? I still think he's a POS for even remotely insinuating that the victims are at fault because they smoked weed sometime within the past month. It isn't as if they had pockets full of drugs.
Do we know for a fact that they didn't drift outside of their allotted 3 feet of roadway?
Page 2 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News