- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 1/7/24 at 11:25 pm to JasonDBlaha
quote:
The truth is that there isn’t any clear-cut evidence that Kohberger actually killed them. All his legal team has to do is raise the doubts, and the judge will let him walk. And based on how there is so little evidence as of right now, they won’t have any problems doing that.
this is a joke, right? They have his DNA at the scene. They have a knife sheath, that fits the suspected murder weapon, with his DNA on it, under one of the girls he killed. They have his car leaving and phone shutting off around the time of the murder. Then turns back on again about the time it would take him to drive there after the murders. They have his vehicle on camera. They have cell phone data showing he drove around that house multiple times days before the killing. That’s just the stuff that is public….. This is case is oooover. They don’t need the house with technology they have today to show the jurors what the house looked like and his potential movements that night
Posted on 1/7/24 at 11:32 pm to IT_Dawg
quote:
They have his car leaving and phone shutting off around the time of the murder. Then turns back on again about the time it would take him to drive there after the murders. They have his vehicle on camera. They have cell phone data showing he drove around that house multiple times days before the killing. That’s just the stuff that is public…..
None of that automatically means he killed them. And his legal team is contesting the reliability of the instrumentation that was used in obtaining his DNA.
Posted on 1/7/24 at 11:33 pm to JasonDBlaha
Someone catch me up. What’s going on? Why’s this thread coming up again
Posted on 1/7/24 at 11:35 pm to JasonDBlaha
quote:
None of that automatically means he killed them. And his legal team is contesting the reliability of the instrumentation that was used in obtaining his DNA.
Are you one of these people that believes circumstantial evidence isn’t real evidence or something? Do you think Casey Anthony was innocent too or the case shouldn’t have even been brought to trial?
Posted on 1/7/24 at 11:49 pm to LSUGent
quote:
Do you think Casey Anthony was innocent too or the case shouldn’t have even been brought to trial?
They let her walk because all of the evidence was purely circumstantial and there were no witnesses when it happened.
The only witness in this case was a girl who couldn’t make out the suspect except for clothing. Other than that, all of the evidence right now is circumstantial.
Posted on 1/8/24 at 1:02 am to JasonDBlaha
Circumstantial evidence IS evidence… many cases have been convicted on mostly circumstantial evidence… go read about Chandler Halderson and his case and how he murdered his parents.
The key phrase the defense loves to point to is “reasonable doubt”… they love to focus on the doubt part but not on the reasonable part. In a case like this there will be a mountain of circumstantial evidence and questions that the defense won’t be able to adequately answer… sure they can point and say there isn’t a murder weapon or whatever… but anyone who isn’t sub 80iq wouldn’t consider it reasonable to doubt he wasn’t involved in the victims murders.
The key phrase the defense loves to point to is “reasonable doubt”… they love to focus on the doubt part but not on the reasonable part. In a case like this there will be a mountain of circumstantial evidence and questions that the defense won’t be able to adequately answer… sure they can point and say there isn’t a murder weapon or whatever… but anyone who isn’t sub 80iq wouldn’t consider it reasonable to doubt he wasn’t involved in the victims murders.
Posted on 1/8/24 at 5:29 am to LSUGent
Would be biggest injustice and worse outcome then OJ if he walks considering nature of crime
Posted on 1/8/24 at 5:49 am to nicholastiger
There were no witnesses in South Carolina and they roasted that Murdaugh dude based on circumstantial evidence
Posted on 1/8/24 at 6:24 am to JasonDBlaha
quote:
They let her walk because all of the evidence was purely circumstantial and there were no witnesses when it happened.
That was a lot different. In this case, they have evidence at the scene with his DNA on it, under a victim...
Also, the circumstantial evidence in this case, is WAY more than in Casey Anthony. Plus, knowing exactly when this happen, puts a lot more weight on the circumstantial evidence. No one would ever believe all those coincidences happened at 3:00am...
Posted on 1/8/24 at 6:28 am to 3D
quote:
There were no witnesses in South Carolina and they roasted that Murdaugh dude based on circumstantial evidence
Ummmmmm, nah bro, not really.
There was DNA and powder residue evidence everywhere.
Posted on 1/8/24 at 7:17 am to nicholastiger
quote:
worse outcome then OJ
THAN
Posted on 1/8/24 at 7:22 am to JasonDBlaha
quote:
None of that automatically means he killed them. And his legal team is contesting the reliability of the instrumentation that was used in obtaining his DNA.
Every defense atty would do this for a case of this magnitude.
Posted on 1/8/24 at 7:28 am to JasonDBlaha
quote:
sted by Message
JasonDBlaha
It was weird enough you bumped this thread for no real reason, but since then every take you've had is shittier and shittier.
Posted on 1/8/24 at 7:28 am to 225Tyga
quote:
What’s going on? Why’s this thread coming up again
Aggie fan randomly wanted to let us all know that Kohberger might be innocent & there’s some psycho frat boy murderer still out there
Latest news I see was from a few days ago and a judge denied a request for TV cameras in court. There’s a closed door hearing coming up on 1/26 with Kohberger’s attorney trying to dismiss the grand jury indictment.
Posted on 1/8/24 at 7:46 am to JimTiger72
With modern technology, all court proceedings should be livestreamed. It would put an end to a lot of prosecutorial frickery.
Posted on 1/8/24 at 7:48 am to PurpleandGold Motown
Why would they tear the house down before trial?
Posted on 1/8/24 at 7:49 am to pioneerbasketball
I live in Idaho. Could have been me.
Posted on 1/8/24 at 7:55 am to Centinel
This is a total frame job. Real killer is still out there.
Posted on 1/8/24 at 7:57 am to 225Tyga
quote:
Someone catch me up. What’s going on? Why’s this thread coming up again
Because JasonDBlaha wanted to troll.
Page 178 of 179
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News