Started By
Message

re: Ukraine say U.S. tanks are ineffective and armor is useless

Posted on 5/29/24 at 1:46 pm to
Posted by Lima Whiskey
Member since Apr 2013
22594 posts
Posted on 5/29/24 at 1:46 pm to
quote:

You can’t even properly train an entry level tanker in that amount of time, much less an entire tank crew. Here’s how training a tanker works:



I was not precise with my language, that's my fault, I meant it's 45 days for basic training now. That does seem to be an ideal scenario though, few get that, and that's all the training that most soldiers receive.
This post was edited on 5/29/24 at 1:56 pm
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
138103 posts
Posted on 5/29/24 at 1:55 pm to
quote:

Its cute you think Ukraine is ever going to repay

Most of the resources have been funneled to the private accounts of leaders in Ukraine and then back into certain hands around the world

And our politicians are in on it as well

They will simply forgive the "loan" like they keep doing for anything else

They're not going to repay because they can't.

We're not going forgive the loan. We're going to hold it over their heads and remind them we can ask for payment in full anytime we want and will do so if they don't do what we say.
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
72151 posts
Posted on 5/29/24 at 1:55 pm to
quote:

I was not precise with my language, that's my fault, I meant it's 45 days for basic training now


Tankers dont go though a separate basic training then AIT. We go though what’s called OSUT (one station unit training) that is specific to being a tanker. Infantry, Cav, and Artillery also have their own version of OSUT. Aspects of what most would call normal “basic training” are incorporated into OSUT.

For tankers it’s 15 weeks. For infantry and Cav, it’s 22 weeks, while for artillery it’s 19 weeks.

All they’re achieving with 45 days of training is feeding the meat grinder with more bodies.

ETA: non-combat arms MOS do go though a generic “basic training” that I think is 8 weeks long. When they finish that, they then go to what’s called AIT (advanced individual training). This is a school where they learn whatever specialized MOS they’ve gone into. For example, all tank mechanics go to the same US Army Armor School as tankers. But instead of training to fight on the tank, they train to maintain and repair tanks. The Army operates different non-combat arms MOS schools at different bases. So, for example, if you join to be an MP, after basic training they’ll send you to Fort Leonard Wood for MP school, or Fort Bliss for medics school, etc.
This post was edited on 5/29/24 at 2:04 pm
Posted by bayou2
New Orleans, LA
Member since Feb 2007
3730 posts
Posted on 5/29/24 at 2:17 pm to


... what you be complaining about ???

You got tanks.

Posted by momentoftruth87
Your mom
Member since Oct 2013
86110 posts
Posted on 5/29/24 at 2:24 pm to
Hence why we stopped using them long ago
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
61281 posts
Posted on 5/29/24 at 2:25 pm to
quote:

They worked fine for me back in my day. Sounds like user error to me.


You didn't have to deal w/cheap $500 drones that could blow you arse up before you even knew you were under attack.

The days of tanks ruling the battlefield are over.
This post was edited on 5/29/24 at 2:26 pm
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
296201 posts
Posted on 5/29/24 at 2:32 pm to
Its probably their shitty personnel.
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
72151 posts
Posted on 5/29/24 at 2:39 pm to
quote:

You didn't have to deal w/cheap $500 drones that could blow you arse up before you even knew you were under attack.


Countermeasures against tanks have been around as long as tanks have existed.

quote:

The days of tanks ruling the battlefield are over.


All because they can be knocked out? You’re joking, right?

1917…


1940…


1945…


1950…


1967…


1983…


1991…


As for cheap ways to knock out a tank, the cost of a Panzerfaust…



… was 15 Reichmarks each.
Posted by jizzle6609
Houston
Member since Jul 2009
17493 posts
Posted on 5/29/24 at 2:42 pm to
Pulling the old Oskar Schindler on them I see.
Posted by SoFla Tideroller
South Florida
Member since Apr 2010
38952 posts
Posted on 5/29/24 at 2:44 pm to
quote:

We're not going forgive the loan. We're going to hold it over their heads and remind them we can ask for payment in full anytime we want and will do so if they don't make some discreet payments to the right Beltway Bandits.


Fixed
Posted by Chrome
Chromeville
Member since Nov 2007
12651 posts
Posted on 5/29/24 at 2:44 pm to
Darth are tanks going the way of the battleship in your estimation? With the advent of portable rocket launches and drones tanks seem to be much more vulnerable now.

I know there have been countermeasures against them since forever, but the tanks role seems to be demising.
This post was edited on 5/29/24 at 2:51 pm
Posted by OweO
Plaquemine, La
Member since Sep 2009
120100 posts
Posted on 5/29/24 at 2:49 pm to
Honestly, I thought it was interesting when this all started and it was a "traditional" war. I thought that was for 3rd world countries considering the technology available today.

This reminds me, last night the movie Edward Snowden was on and I watched the majority of it. I watched it once, right when it was available on whatever platform it came out first on (I think HBO). He talks about how the US had the ability to cut off an entire country's electricity (countrbies who are our allies, Japan, etc, etc. The idea was that just in case one day they are no longer our allies then we would have leverage over them).

I also found it interesting that when they introduced Japan to what we were doing, they were impressed by the abilities of drones, but was not at all impressed with the idea of being able to monitor its citizens because it goes against their citizens liberties.. which made me think about how much bullshite is fed to us... the US citizens. The US government don't give a single frick about our liberties. Here its just a perception. And for the first time I became convinced there will be an uprising in the US because there is the idea of the US of A, which is great.. Then there is the reality of the US of A.. And its nothing like the idea. And as crazy as it sounds, I am convinced that the US government (or those within) wants the majority of the citizens to be just educated enough to do a job and to fill the rest of their life with low level entertainment because they can't have too many people asking questions..

The Ukraine situation is a situation I think is one that they don't want too many people asking "is something more than what we see going on?".

Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
138103 posts
Posted on 5/29/24 at 3:00 pm to
quote:

Fixed

Yeah, Ukraine is going to be DC's washing machine for the next 100 years
Posted by ELVIS U
Member since Feb 2007
11587 posts
Posted on 5/29/24 at 3:01 pm to
That is because we are sending them our old shite and replenishing it with new equipment for our army and new kickbacks for our politicians.
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
72151 posts
Posted on 5/29/24 at 3:04 pm to
quote:

Darth are tanks going the way of the battleship in your estimation? With the advent of portable rocket launches and drones tanks seem to be much more vulnerable now.

I know there have been countermeasures against them since forever, but the tanks role seems to be demising.


No. They’re not going the way of the battleship. Tanks are no more vulnerably today than they were 80 years ago. By that I mean they’ve always been vulnerable. I understand there is a perception among the public that until the last 2 years tanks were these massive invulnerable behemoths that roamed the battlefield killing literally everything with impunity. But that’s fantasy. No tank has been, or ever will be invulnerable. The most mighty tank of each age has always been vulnerable. A good example of this myth is the Königstiger in WWII. They were the biggest tank of the time with the fearsome 8.8 L70 main gun. Here’s one though…


(Knocked out by a freaking 2” mortar!)


(Knocked out by an American M36)

The technology has indeed changed. Thats for sure. But, that’s nothing new either. Tank technology has been changing since they were first introduced over a century ago. And from the moment they were introduced, ways to kill then were immediately introduced. As one side of that coin advances, the other counters that advance. The overall purpose of the tank though remains, specifically to give a ground force mobile, armored firepower to engage and destroy the enemy force. As long as the need to seize and hold ground is a thing in warfare, there will be a need for tanks.
Posted by J Murdah
Member since Jun 2008
40113 posts
Posted on 5/29/24 at 3:32 pm to
theyre saying a lot of obvious shite like the tank is the #1 target and if hit the crew inside is likely killed.
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
72151 posts
Posted on 5/29/24 at 3:36 pm to
quote:

theyre saying a lot of obvious shite like the tank is the #1 target and if hit the crew inside is likely killed.


That’s where the Abrams is far different than Russian tanks. The turret ammo storage compartment is designed specifically to blow up and away from the crew compartment. Unless the loader has the ammo storage door opened or they drop a munition into an opened loader’s or TC hatch, even in the even of a complete ammo load detonation, the crew will survive.

And if the crew is dumb enough to go into that combat situation with hatches unbuttoned, that’s on them.
Posted by RaoulDuke504
Member since Aug 2023
3410 posts
Posted on 5/29/24 at 3:46 pm to
quote:

And Ukraine is on the hook for repaying all that money thus turning them into a US serf state for the next 200 years, if they even win.


Ukraine is the only country that regressed post Soviet Union they are never paying that back
Posted by I20goon
about 7mi down a dirt road
Member since Aug 2013
19175 posts
Posted on 5/29/24 at 4:10 pm to
quote:

Ukraine is the only country that regressed post Soviet Union they are never paying that ba
Turkmenistan says hold my beer.
Posted by RaoulDuke504
Member since Aug 2023
3410 posts
Posted on 5/29/24 at 4:25 pm to
quote:

Turkmenistan says hold my beer.


they at least have a dictator to blame
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram