- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Ukraine say U.S. tanks are ineffective and armor is useless
Posted on 5/29/24 at 1:46 pm to Darth_Vader
Posted on 5/29/24 at 1:46 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
You can’t even properly train an entry level tanker in that amount of time, much less an entire tank crew. Here’s how training a tanker works:
I was not precise with my language, that's my fault, I meant it's 45 days for basic training now. That does seem to be an ideal scenario though, few get that, and that's all the training that most soldiers receive.
This post was edited on 5/29/24 at 1:56 pm
Posted on 5/29/24 at 1:55 pm to Rev Bob Levy Sucks
quote:
Its cute you think Ukraine is ever going to repay
Most of the resources have been funneled to the private accounts of leaders in Ukraine and then back into certain hands around the world
And our politicians are in on it as well
They will simply forgive the "loan" like they keep doing for anything else
They're not going to repay because they can't.
We're not going forgive the loan. We're going to hold it over their heads and remind them we can ask for payment in full anytime we want and will do so if they don't do what we say.
Posted on 5/29/24 at 1:55 pm to Lima Whiskey
quote:
I was not precise with my language, that's my fault, I meant it's 45 days for basic training now
Tankers dont go though a separate basic training then AIT. We go though what’s called OSUT (one station unit training) that is specific to being a tanker. Infantry, Cav, and Artillery also have their own version of OSUT. Aspects of what most would call normal “basic training” are incorporated into OSUT.
For tankers it’s 15 weeks. For infantry and Cav, it’s 22 weeks, while for artillery it’s 19 weeks.
All they’re achieving with 45 days of training is feeding the meat grinder with more bodies.
ETA: non-combat arms MOS do go though a generic “basic training” that I think is 8 weeks long. When they finish that, they then go to what’s called AIT (advanced individual training). This is a school where they learn whatever specialized MOS they’ve gone into. For example, all tank mechanics go to the same US Army Armor School as tankers. But instead of training to fight on the tank, they train to maintain and repair tanks. The Army operates different non-combat arms MOS schools at different bases. So, for example, if you join to be an MP, after basic training they’ll send you to Fort Leonard Wood for MP school, or Fort Bliss for medics school, etc.
This post was edited on 5/29/24 at 2:04 pm
Posted on 5/29/24 at 2:17 pm to RaoulDuke504
... what you be complaining about ???
You got tanks.
Posted on 5/29/24 at 2:24 pm to RaoulDuke504
Hence why we stopped using them long ago
Posted on 5/29/24 at 2:25 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
They worked fine for me back in my day. Sounds like user error to me.
You didn't have to deal w/cheap $500 drones that could blow you arse up before you even knew you were under attack.
The days of tanks ruling the battlefield are over.
This post was edited on 5/29/24 at 2:26 pm
Posted on 5/29/24 at 2:32 pm to RaoulDuke504
Its probably their shitty personnel.
Posted on 5/29/24 at 2:39 pm to Dr RC
quote:
You didn't have to deal w/cheap $500 drones that could blow you arse up before you even knew you were under attack.
Countermeasures against tanks have been around as long as tanks have existed.
quote:
The days of tanks ruling the battlefield are over.
All because they can be knocked out? You’re joking, right?
1917…
1940…
1945…
1950…
1967…
1983…
1991…
As for cheap ways to knock out a tank, the cost of a Panzerfaust…
… was 15 Reichmarks each.
Posted on 5/29/24 at 2:42 pm to RaoulDuke504
Pulling the old Oskar Schindler on them I see.
Posted on 5/29/24 at 2:44 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
We're not going forgive the loan. We're going to hold it over their heads and remind them we can ask for payment in full anytime we want and will do so if they don't make some discreet payments to the right Beltway Bandits.
Fixed
Posted on 5/29/24 at 2:44 pm to Darth_Vader
Darth are tanks going the way of the battleship in your estimation? With the advent of portable rocket launches and drones tanks seem to be much more vulnerable now.
I know there have been countermeasures against them since forever, but the tanks role seems to be demising.
I know there have been countermeasures against them since forever, but the tanks role seems to be demising.
This post was edited on 5/29/24 at 2:51 pm
Posted on 5/29/24 at 2:49 pm to RaoulDuke504
Honestly, I thought it was interesting when this all started and it was a "traditional" war. I thought that was for 3rd world countries considering the technology available today.
This reminds me, last night the movie Edward Snowden was on and I watched the majority of it. I watched it once, right when it was available on whatever platform it came out first on (I think HBO). He talks about how the US had the ability to cut off an entire country's electricity (countrbies who are our allies, Japan, etc, etc. The idea was that just in case one day they are no longer our allies then we would have leverage over them).
I also found it interesting that when they introduced Japan to what we were doing, they were impressed by the abilities of drones, but was not at all impressed with the idea of being able to monitor its citizens because it goes against their citizens liberties.. which made me think about how much bullshite is fed to us... the US citizens. The US government don't give a single frick about our liberties. Here its just a perception. And for the first time I became convinced there will be an uprising in the US because there is the idea of the US of A, which is great.. Then there is the reality of the US of A.. And its nothing like the idea. And as crazy as it sounds, I am convinced that the US government (or those within) wants the majority of the citizens to be just educated enough to do a job and to fill the rest of their life with low level entertainment because they can't have too many people asking questions..
The Ukraine situation is a situation I think is one that they don't want too many people asking "is something more than what we see going on?".
This reminds me, last night the movie Edward Snowden was on and I watched the majority of it. I watched it once, right when it was available on whatever platform it came out first on (I think HBO). He talks about how the US had the ability to cut off an entire country's electricity (countrbies who are our allies, Japan, etc, etc. The idea was that just in case one day they are no longer our allies then we would have leverage over them).
I also found it interesting that when they introduced Japan to what we were doing, they were impressed by the abilities of drones, but was not at all impressed with the idea of being able to monitor its citizens because it goes against their citizens liberties.. which made me think about how much bullshite is fed to us... the US citizens. The US government don't give a single frick about our liberties. Here its just a perception. And for the first time I became convinced there will be an uprising in the US because there is the idea of the US of A, which is great.. Then there is the reality of the US of A.. And its nothing like the idea. And as crazy as it sounds, I am convinced that the US government (or those within) wants the majority of the citizens to be just educated enough to do a job and to fill the rest of their life with low level entertainment because they can't have too many people asking questions..
The Ukraine situation is a situation I think is one that they don't want too many people asking "is something more than what we see going on?".
Posted on 5/29/24 at 3:00 pm to SoFla Tideroller
quote:
Fixed
Yeah, Ukraine is going to be DC's washing machine for the next 100 years
Posted on 5/29/24 at 3:01 pm to RaoulDuke504
That is because we are sending them our old shite and replenishing it with new equipment for our army and new kickbacks for our politicians.
Posted on 5/29/24 at 3:04 pm to Chrome
quote:
Darth are tanks going the way of the battleship in your estimation? With the advent of portable rocket launches and drones tanks seem to be much more vulnerable now.
I know there have been countermeasures against them since forever, but the tanks role seems to be demising.
No. They’re not going the way of the battleship. Tanks are no more vulnerably today than they were 80 years ago. By that I mean they’ve always been vulnerable. I understand there is a perception among the public that until the last 2 years tanks were these massive invulnerable behemoths that roamed the battlefield killing literally everything with impunity. But that’s fantasy. No tank has been, or ever will be invulnerable. The most mighty tank of each age has always been vulnerable. A good example of this myth is the Königstiger in WWII. They were the biggest tank of the time with the fearsome 8.8 L70 main gun. Here’s one though…
(Knocked out by a freaking 2” mortar!)
(Knocked out by an American M36)
The technology has indeed changed. Thats for sure. But, that’s nothing new either. Tank technology has been changing since they were first introduced over a century ago. And from the moment they were introduced, ways to kill then were immediately introduced. As one side of that coin advances, the other counters that advance. The overall purpose of the tank though remains, specifically to give a ground force mobile, armored firepower to engage and destroy the enemy force. As long as the need to seize and hold ground is a thing in warfare, there will be a need for tanks.
Posted on 5/29/24 at 3:32 pm to RaoulDuke504
theyre saying a lot of obvious shite like the tank is the #1 target and if hit the crew inside is likely killed.
Posted on 5/29/24 at 3:36 pm to J Murdah
quote:
theyre saying a lot of obvious shite like the tank is the #1 target and if hit the crew inside is likely killed.
That’s where the Abrams is far different than Russian tanks. The turret ammo storage compartment is designed specifically to blow up and away from the crew compartment. Unless the loader has the ammo storage door opened or they drop a munition into an opened loader’s or TC hatch, even in the even of a complete ammo load detonation, the crew will survive.
And if the crew is dumb enough to go into that combat situation with hatches unbuttoned, that’s on them.
Posted on 5/29/24 at 3:46 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
And Ukraine is on the hook for repaying all that money thus turning them into a US serf state for the next 200 years, if they even win.
Ukraine is the only country that regressed post Soviet Union they are never paying that back
Posted on 5/29/24 at 4:10 pm to RaoulDuke504
quote:Turkmenistan says hold my beer.
Ukraine is the only country that regressed post Soviet Union they are never paying that ba
Posted on 5/29/24 at 4:25 pm to I20goon
quote:
Turkmenistan says hold my beer.
they at least have a dictator to blame
Popular
Back to top


1







