Started By
Message

Today marks the 160th anniversary of the Black Day of the Confederate Army...

Posted on 4/6/25 at 7:22 am
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
68288 posts
Posted on 4/6/25 at 7:22 am
The Battle of Sailor's Creek.

After the fall of both Petersburg (April 2) and Richmond (April 3), Robert E. Lee and the Confederate Army of Northern Virginia began to retreat westward toward the hamlet of Amelia Court House. The goal of this retreat was to reach Amelia Court House, resupply the army, and then link up with General Joseph E. Johnston's army in North Carolina to continue the struggle. However, logistical delays and aggressive Union pursuit by General Ulysses S. Grant’s forces, particularly under Generals Philip Sheridan and Andrew Humphreys, allowed the Army of the Potomac to close the gap and strike hard at Lee’s straggling columns.

At Sailor’s Creek, Lee's army had become divided while trying to cross the swollen stream, and Sheridan capitalized on the situation. Three separate engagements occurred that day: the battles at Hillsman’s Farm, Marshall’s Crossroads, and Lockett’s Farm. Union forces overwhelmed and captured large portions of Lee’s rear guard, including troops under General Richard Ewell and parts of General John B. Gordon’s and General Richard Anderson’s commands.

The Confederates suffered catastrophic losses: over 7,700 men were captured, including eight generals such as Ewell, Custis Lee (Robert E. Lee’s son), and Joseph Kershaw. The defeat reduced Lee’s army by nearly a quarter in a single day. The psychological impact was equally severe. When General Lee witnessed the fleeing remnants of his troops, he reportedly exclaimed, “My God! Has the army dissolved?”

The loss at Sailor’s Creek made continued resistance nearly impossible. Nevertheless, Lee continued his westward retreat in the forlorn hope of finding food at nearby Appomattox Court House and Johnston's army in North Carolina. The proverbial noose, however, was indeed tightening and quickly.



Posted by geauxtigers87
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2011
26049 posts
Posted on 4/6/25 at 7:27 am to
Posted by ned nederlander
Member since Dec 2012
5031 posts
Posted on 4/6/25 at 7:39 am to
quote:

Generals Philip Sheridan


Most underrated general of the entire war.
Posted by PetroBabich
Donetsk Oblast
Member since Apr 2017
4920 posts
Posted on 4/6/25 at 7:44 am to
I recently read the one volume version of Lee's Lieutenants which talks about this final period and one thing I found out that I didn't know was by this time a lot of the general officers were walking wounded. Massively scarred, in some cases missing limbs from previous campaigns. The Army of Northern Virginia must have looked like the walking dead by this point.
Posted by No Colors
Sandbar
Member since Sep 2010
12022 posts
Posted on 4/6/25 at 8:03 am to
quote:

The Army of Northern Virginia must have looked like the walking dead by this point.


In 1865 in Mississippi, 20% of the men between 18 and 65 were missing an arm or a leg.

The single largest expenditure of the state legislature that year was for prosthetic limbs.
Posted by TT9
Global warming
Member since Sep 2008
86301 posts
Posted on 4/6/25 at 8:04 am to
To hell with the loser confederates.
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
68288 posts
Posted on 4/6/25 at 8:04 am to
quote:

The Army of Northern Virginia must have looked like the walking dead by this point.


Absolutely.

They had just endured nine months of siege warfare around Petersburg. On top of it all, the country had essentially collapsed in the latter half of 1864 due to the ongoing naval blockade of Confederate ports, Sheridan's legions riding roughshod and burning everything they could find in the Shenandoah Valley, and Sherman's infamous March to the Sea. Food was scarce, their clothes were in tatters, and medical care was becoming more and more sub-optimal due to supply shortages.
Posted by cypresstiger
The South
Member since Aug 2008
12376 posts
Posted on 4/6/25 at 8:10 am to
To hell with the loser confederates.
—-160 years is a long time to be bitter
This post was edited on 4/6/25 at 8:10 am
Posted by No Colors
Sandbar
Member since Sep 2010
12022 posts
Posted on 4/6/25 at 8:18 am to
quote:

To hell with the loser confederates.

Ok
quote:

160 years is a long time to be bitter

Then why are you so bitter?
Posted by greenbean
USAF Retired - 31 years
Member since Feb 2019
5701 posts
Posted on 4/6/25 at 8:21 am to
I hate that we've romanticized that Lee and Davis were heroes. They got a ton of poor Southerners killed in an unwinnable war. For an institution (slavery) that was on its way out anyway. The majority of those fighting were actually disadvantaged by salavery as it drove wages for the working class. The ultimate rich man's war.
Posted by bamaguy17
Member since Jul 2022
1207 posts
Posted on 4/6/25 at 8:28 am to
quote:

slavery

If I could go back in time, I would turn those boats around. You know…to stop slavery
Posted by No Colors
Sandbar
Member since Sep 2010
12022 posts
Posted on 4/6/25 at 8:43 am to
quote:

would turn those boats around. You know…to stop slavery


What a terrible bargain that turned out to be.
Posted by Globetrotter747
Member since Sep 2017
4846 posts
Posted on 4/6/25 at 9:58 am to
quote:

If I could go back in time, I would turn those boats around. You know…to stop slavery

The irony is today’s black man in the USA is better off because of the slave trade and the white man is worse off because of it.

But don’t tell anyone that.
Posted by PetroBabich
Donetsk Oblast
Member since Apr 2017
4920 posts
Posted on 4/6/25 at 10:26 am to
quote:

today’s black man in the USA is better off because of the slave trade


I disagree.
Posted by UFFan
Planet earth, Milky Way Galaxy
Member since Aug 2016
2250 posts
Posted on 4/6/25 at 10:30 am to
The actual stat is that 20% of the Mississippi state budget in 1865 was spent on prosthetics. Not that 20% of Mississippi men were missing an arm or leg.
Posted by geauxskeet
Member since Oct 2009
547 posts
Posted on 4/6/25 at 10:54 am to
quote:

quote:
today’s black man in the USA is better off because of the slave trade



I disagree.


If you have ever been to West Africa, you would agree. The poorest blacks here generally live better than the richest there, at least in the countries I have been to, Liberia, Sierra Leone, Nigeria, and Ghana.
Posted by 777Tiger
Member since Mar 2011
82673 posts
Posted on 4/6/25 at 10:58 am to
quote:

The poorest blacks here generally live better than the richest there


blacks in this country have more opportunities and less hurdles than blacks in just about any country in the world, they are just their own worst enemy about not seizing these opportunities instead of drinking the generationally passed down Kool-Aid that they've been oppressed, held down, blah, blah, blah, by the white man and should never have to do anything but receive reparations form the white man
Posted by ATrillionaire
Houston
Member since Sep 2008
1090 posts
Posted on 4/6/25 at 10:59 am to
quote:

If you have ever been to West Africa, you would agree. The poorest blacks here generally live better than the richest there, at least in the countries I have been to, Liberia, Sierra Leone, Nigeria, and Ghana.

What does that have to do with "today's black man in the USA"? Is the assumption that no African would migrate and settle in the USA?
Posted by 777Tiger
Member since Mar 2011
82673 posts
Posted on 4/6/25 at 11:01 am to
quote:

Is the assumption that no African would migrate and settle in the USA?


why do you think there are rafts of people all over the Caribbean trying to make it to the US? and people stowing away in wheel wells of airliners trying to get here?
Posted by PetroBabich
Donetsk Oblast
Member since Apr 2017
4920 posts
Posted on 4/6/25 at 11:01 am to
You're making a completely different point.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram