- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Time to check in with AI - NSFW
Posted on 10/17/24 at 3:15 pm to DarthRebel
Posted on 10/17/24 at 3:15 pm to DarthRebel
Walking up the street and looking at us. But you can see where this is going. That whole post about Only Fans and the big earners will be moot. These AI chicks will do anything and look perfect. And since it is a "cartoon", is it even naughty or immoral? Can we call them sluts?
Posted on 10/17/24 at 3:18 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The problem is they relied on the "portrait" mode and touched up all of them with tech. Wouldn't shock me if this is a gotcha (which would be silly given what I just said), but the blonde we see from behind is my guess.
The heavily tanned 'women" are make believe.
Posted on 10/17/24 at 3:20 pm to cdhorn28
quote:
wrong, I'm telling you Darth, this is her... How do I know more than you in this subject?
I will stand corrected, that swimsuit is on Emily's Insta

Somebody up to some Internet hijinks

This is "Lily"

And Emily

Posted on 10/17/24 at 3:25 pm to DarthRebel
Real or not……they all fine
Posted on 10/17/24 at 4:07 pm to DarthRebel
Emily is the “new” Sierra
Skye.
Skye.
Posted on 10/17/24 at 4:10 pm to DarthRebel
You know what’s sad? All these OF models putting themselves out there are just giving fuel for AI to make better versions of them. Soon, a real-life OF model will have zero demand.
Posted on 10/17/24 at 4:13 pm to cdhorn28
quote:
Emily Elizabeth
Heard she likes big red dogs
Posted on 10/17/24 at 4:13 pm to Aubie Spr96
quote:
Agreed, but I desperately want #1 to be real.
We need to go all Weird Science on #1 and make her real

Posted on 10/17/24 at 4:28 pm to BillyGibbons
quote:
You know what’s sad? All these OF models putting themselves out there are just giving fuel for AI to make better versions of them. Soon, a real-life OF model will have zero demand.
You are very spot on. Much how language models are being trained off written word, the image and video AI are trained off the same matching media. Some AI companies have gotten in trouble for scraping the world of youtube and instagram to train their models, but it is going to happen.

Did not nail the Lyceum


Posted on 10/17/24 at 5:05 pm to DarthRebel
quote:
Some AI companies have gotten in trouble for scraping the world of youtube and instagram to train their models, but it is going to happen.
Why? They all tell you that is what they intend to do. Elon/X is getting shite on right now for a new user agreement that revolves around it. If you are in the US anything you put online, pics/vids of yourself, videos of kid's ballgames and birthday parties, pretty beach and weather photography, works of traditional art, anything can and will be mined by AI, and all platforms are doing. Not just that, they all reserve the right to sell your content (whatever it may be) to any third party they choose for pretty much any reason.
Europe has done a whole lot more to nip this issue in the bud, but our lawmakers don't give a shite and our intellectual property/copyright laws are dogshit.
Posted on 10/17/24 at 5:06 pm to DarthRebel
I think the second one is a heavily airbrushed Emily Elizabeth
Posted on 10/17/24 at 5:10 pm to DarthRebel
Heh. Looks like AI must be written in BASIC.
Posted on 10/17/24 at 5:47 pm to LegendInMyMind
quote:
Why? They all tell you that is what they intend to do. Elon/X is getting shite on right now for a new user agreement that revolves around it.
The social media platforms DGAF about the ethics of using folks’ content for training. They just want to get paid for it.
Remember when Elon implemented the rate limit on X and started making you sign in to see some content? At the time, he said it was because so many AI companies were scraping the platform. Now he’s using that same data to train Grok.
Reddit somewhat recently signed agreements with both Google, OpenAI, and others to allow them to train on user content. Supposedly those agreements are worth something like $200 million for Reddit. It’s becoming a key part of the social media business model.
Posted on 10/17/24 at 5:53 pm to lostinbr
What are these ladies selling?
Posted on 10/17/24 at 6:03 pm to aTmTexas Dillo
quote:
These AI chicks will do anything and look perfect.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
Posted on 10/17/24 at 6:14 pm to DarthRebel
Wish number 2 was real. She is the best one and it's not even close.
Posted on 10/17/24 at 6:23 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The problem is they relied on the "portrait" mode and touched up all of them with tech. Wouldn't shock me if this is a gotcha (which would be silly given what I just said), but the blonde we see from behind is my guess.
Look at her right hand when she walks.
Posted on 10/17/24 at 6:24 pm to lostinbr
quote:
It’s becoming a key part of the social media business model.
It is, and in Europe you can opt out of having your content/IP used by them for that purpose. You don't get that option in the US. In fact, social media platforms are allowed to go even further by being able to reserve the right to use your content for pretty much any reason they see fit, including selling it to a third party, and they reserve the right to do so in perpetuity. We are so far behind the times with all of this that it is sad.
People who shite on Elon/X and say they are leaving for other platforms are hypocrites as usual, though. All the others do the same things. Elon at least didn't bury it in the fine print of a click-through user agreement that no one reads.
Popular
Back to top
