- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: TikToker Who Casually Said N-Word in Video and then Claimed She Didn't 'Care' Fired
Posted on 6/12/24 at 7:46 am to jcaz
Posted on 6/12/24 at 7:46 am to jcaz
quote:
She complains about her girl’s husbands being broke but likely is broke herself and also doesn’t have a man.
She’s 23 and objectively attractive. The world is her oyster, financially.
0
Posted on 6/12/24 at 7:48 am to low end
quote:
The phrase makes no sense outside of a constitutional context.
What she (and you, apparently) meant to say is "freedom to say things without consequences", which has never existed.
I believe the phrase is FAFO.
Not sure where you got all the other bullshite you said, but you do you.
There are statutes on seeking to harm or punish people for exercising their rights. It's not just the government that is prohibited from a conspiracy to violate your rights or punish you for exercising your rights.
Posted on 6/12/24 at 7:49 am to whatiknowsofar
I think I have a new crush..
Posted on 6/12/24 at 7:50 am to FluffyBunnyFeet
Yes that's the one!
If she wanted to keep her job (she clearly didn't care) she shouldn't have said it.
If she wanted to keep her job (she clearly didn't care) she shouldn't have said it.
Posted on 6/12/24 at 7:50 am to POTUS2024
quote:
exercising their rights.
What right was violated in this case?
Posted on 6/12/24 at 7:50 am to low end
quote:
Another fricking moron who doesn't understand the legal definition of freedom of speech.
Yeah.... it's clear you don't.
Posted on 6/12/24 at 7:54 am to Epaminondas
NOT GUILTY!
Posted on 6/12/24 at 7:55 am to whatiknowsofar
This is not "consequence of speech"- this is mob rule.
Where is the irreparable damage???
It's really too bad people don't get this upset over the armies of shitbags doing REAL damage to their communities and the surrounding areas.
There's very little effort trying to stop THAT, isn't there?
Anyone who thinks it's okay to go after someone like this over a WORD is a lowlife fool with the priorities of a dung beetle.
Where is the irreparable damage???
It's really too bad people don't get this upset over the armies of shitbags doing REAL damage to their communities and the surrounding areas.
There's very little effort trying to stop THAT, isn't there?
Anyone who thinks it's okay to go after someone like this over a WORD is a lowlife fool with the priorities of a dung beetle.
Posted on 6/12/24 at 7:55 am to LSUGrad2024
quote:
Yeah.... it's clear you don't.
Ok then. Please explain how this person's freedom of speech was "taken" or infringed upon.
Posted on 6/12/24 at 7:56 am to Epaminondas
quote:
Rules?
I've seen better in the quad.
Posted on 6/12/24 at 7:56 am to whatiknowsofar
you can't say those bad words, you just can't
Posted on 6/12/24 at 7:57 am to 6R12
quote:
you can't say those bad words, you just can't
Why not?
Posted on 6/12/24 at 8:00 am to Epaminondas
quote:
Not guilty
Posted on 6/12/24 at 8:00 am to Bunta
Also reminds me of that poor spelling bee kid spelling “Negus”
Posted on 6/12/24 at 8:00 am to frequent flyer
quote:
Probably shouldn’t have said that though.
Yeah we know how fragile they are. Simple words make them riot.
Posted on 6/12/24 at 8:00 am to grizzlylongcut
quote:
Yeah we know how fragile they are. Simple words make them riot.
Words they use many times daily.
Posted on 6/12/24 at 8:02 am to whatiknowsofar
Any black person offended by the casual use of that word is a hypocrite. The elimination of the word begins and ends in the black home. It has no power unless weakminded individuals lend it. Can't commercialize a word then demand that 70% of the population refrain from using it. Want to talk about privilege? There you go.
Posted on 6/12/24 at 8:04 am to StringedInstruments
quote:
Businesses should be allowed to hire and fire anyone based on their character. If the company doesn’t like an employee making racially charged statements to generate controversy, they should have the right to remove that person from their staff.
Right but that’s not how it is.
Fire a black woman for saying it and you are discriminating.
Posted on 6/12/24 at 8:06 am to BugAC
quote:
It's convenient then, that the same people that want to assault someone or have someone fired for saying a word are the ones responsible for proliferating the use of that same word.
FIFY
Posted on 6/12/24 at 8:07 am to whatiknowsofar
Aside from the free speech angle, why would she say this? What compelled her to say it? Was it worth all this bullshite? Did she need all this in her life?
Page 2 of 13
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News