- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 5/4/18 at 11:11 am to FitzBlitz52
One of the problems schools have (and I'm completely sympathetic) is a fear of liability. I'll give you an example. Let's say a girl reports a guy and said she heard him say he wants to shoot up the school. First, how does a school verify this information? Second, there's potential for civil liability on both ends. If the girl is right and the school does nothing, there's liability for any potential victims. If the girl is wrong or making it up and the school expels the student and gets him charged with a crime, there is definite civil liability. It's a no-win situation for the school.
Posted on 5/4/18 at 11:14 am to FitzBlitz52
quote:
He was also sent to JDC for 3 days, then an alternative education facility for 15 days
Little harsh if he's just a dumb kid, but I bet he won't make that joke again.
quote:
However, upon his return to campus he makes another threat and leaves very troublesome comments on social media. Always referring to himself as a one of the infamous people as of late to do a big public shooting.
Uh that kid needs to be locked up somewhere.
Posted on 5/4/18 at 11:14 am to Hammertime
So threatening the lives of 2000 people should just go unchecked? I am all for personal freedoms and the Bill of Rights but what these kids are saying/suggesting is alarming. Maybe my idea/solution is a little extreme but its only extreme to protect my co-workers, myself, and my kids.
Posted on 5/4/18 at 11:14 am to FitzBlitz52
Sounds like an infringement on 2A to me.
Posted on 5/4/18 at 11:16 am to FitzBlitz52
quote:
FitzBlitz52
You are supposed to say, “threatening to shoot up a school is not ok”.
Posted on 5/4/18 at 11:16 am to SCLibertarian
quote:
One of the problems schools have (and I'm completely sympathetic) is a fear of liability. I'll give you an example. Let's say a girl reports a guy and said she heard him say he wants to shoot up the school. First, how does a school verify this information? Second, there's potential for civil liability on both ends. If the girl is right and the school does nothing, there's liability for any potential victims. If the girl is wrong or making it up and the school expels the student and gets him charged with a crime, there is definite civil liability. It's a no-win situation for the school.
Valid point. The "he said she said" stuff is murky water. Obviously my thoughts are not fool proof its simply a suggestion that would need to be adjusted and edited in many ways.
Posted on 5/4/18 at 11:18 am to FitzBlitz52
"I'm going to kill you" and "I'm bringing a gun to school tomorrow and shooting you in the face" are a bit different, no?
Posted on 5/4/18 at 11:22 am to TH03
Right. There are things kids/people say that should be taken at face value. "Do that again and I'll kill you" is something you shouldn't say in a school and should be verbally corrected.
When kids take pictures of a place to plan out how they would shoot people on campus or makes loud claims in class for all to hear how they "will shoot this MFer up" and makes extreme comments on social media about it and refers to themselves as an infamous mass murder: I'd say something needs to be done with that kid.
When kids take pictures of a place to plan out how they would shoot people on campus or makes loud claims in class for all to hear how they "will shoot this MFer up" and makes extreme comments on social media about it and refers to themselves as an infamous mass murder: I'd say something needs to be done with that kid.
Posted on 5/4/18 at 11:24 am to FitzBlitz52
quote:You absolutely are not, and your statements don't support it. I can say whatever I want. Doesn't mean I'm going to do anything....first amendment and all.
I am all for personal freedoms and the Bill of Rights
You're basically arresting people for thinking out loud. They didn't actually DO anything illegal, they just said they would.
I'm sure you're one of the guys always complaining about big government and police overreach. This is a prime example.
Watch this:
"FitzBlitz52 told me he was going to shoot me tomorrow. Go arrest him". See how that works?
This post was edited on 5/4/18 at 11:27 am
Posted on 5/4/18 at 11:33 am to Hammertime
Couldn't be further from the truth. You sound like one of my ignorant 9th graders.
You should not be able to say aloud in class, that you plan on shooting up the school. Saying "Dude do that again and I'll kick you arse" is one thing. But blatantly making threats that are planned out and cause panic to those around the student should not be tolerated.
If you think you can "say whatever you want" then go make public threats of harm at a school near you. I'm sure people will think you're just a friendly neighborhood prankster just looking for laughs.
You should not be able to say aloud in class, that you plan on shooting up the school. Saying "Dude do that again and I'll kick you arse" is one thing. But blatantly making threats that are planned out and cause panic to those around the student should not be tolerated.
If you think you can "say whatever you want" then go make public threats of harm at a school near you. I'm sure people will think you're just a friendly neighborhood prankster just looking for laughs.
Posted on 5/4/18 at 11:38 am to Hammertime
quote:
I can say whatever I want.
That's not what the Supreme Court says.
Posted on 5/4/18 at 11:38 am to Hammertime
quote:
"FitzBlitz52 told me he was going to shoot me tomorrow. Go arrest him". See how that works?
Not at all what I am suggesting. Your ignorance is astounding.
When a teacher or 5 other students come forward because they heard a student say aloud they plan on shooting up a school, that student should be reprimanded. Is my original suggestion too extreme? Sure, maybe. Imagine your child is in a class and hears a kid proclaiming they will shoot up the school and shows you posts online about it and refers to themselves as an infamous mass murder, you as the parent, wouldn't you want a safer environment for your child? And have your child a part of a system willing to protect your child? That's all I'm suggesting. protect the majority from the crazy minority who want to cause harm to others in a lethal way.
Posted on 5/4/18 at 11:42 am to FitzBlitz52
I'm explaining that it is ridiculous that people can get arrested for words. It's even illegal in some jurisdictions to curse at cops. Now, is that freedom of speech?
I don't support thought police, and I don't support people being arrested for not actually doing anything wrong
I don't support thought police, and I don't support people being arrested for not actually doing anything wrong
Posted on 5/4/18 at 11:45 am to FitzBlitz52
You're arresting someone for a "what if" scenario
Posted on 5/4/18 at 11:46 am to Hammertime
quote:
I'm explaining that it is ridiculous that people can get arrested for words
So a guy should be able to get on the intercom at school, say "I'm bringing in 3 guns tomorrow and I'm going to shoot as many people possible" and not be arrested until the next day after he's killed 20 people? All because "muh first amendment?"
I'll give you a hint though, that's already illegal and not protected by the first amendment.
Posted on 5/4/18 at 11:47 am to Hammertime
quote:
You're arresting someone for a "what if" scenario
And you're seeing a kid with a whole plan and letting him carry it out because you think it's somehow a protected right.
Posted on 5/4/18 at 11:48 am to Hammertime
You're right. Saying "F You" to a cop, although rude and all, should not be an arrest able offense. Threatening to shoot up and school, and having details planned out and making alarming posts on social media, something should be done about that. Arrest and prison time? That's harsh. But being escorted out of the school by campus police, being questioned and investigated? Absolutely.
Posted on 5/4/18 at 11:49 am to SCLibertarian
quote:
Threats without proof of imminency should not result in any form of criminal prosecution.
Yea this is how bad stuff ends up happening
Threats to the safety of the public should always be taken seriously.
If someone threats to shoot up a place he needs to be retained for safety concerns for himself and others.
This post was edited on 5/4/18 at 11:50 am
Popular
Back to top


0





