Started By
Message

re: Thoughts on taking flouride out of water?

Posted on 5/8/25 at 3:09 pm to
Posted by lepdagod
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2015
5475 posts
Posted on 5/8/25 at 3:09 pm to
quote:

though the idea originated in those European countries they claim to love so much.


You sure???
Posted by Deepwood
Member since Sep 2023
50 posts
Posted on 5/8/25 at 3:14 pm to
Wasn’t trying to ruffle any feathers. Your claims just seemed a little sensationalized, and when I copied and pasted your post into Google the first thing that came up is someone trying make money by selling products to fix the problems they found doing their own research.

Just wondering if these were claims you saw on Dr. Oz or the today show. While I do understand and agree with the positive affects of nitric oxide, everything I just read seems to be pretty inconclusive at the moment about the negative effects of flouride and mouthwash on the production of nitric oxide on the back of the tongue.

Most of the places I did find a claim of negative impacts were quickly followed up with a health regime, toothpaste, or book, that you could buy to learn more. Just makes me a little skeptical.

Just as I pointed out with landmass’ link to a group of “biological”dentists who publish their own studies so they have “research” to quote as to why you should take the perfectly functional amalgam fillings out of your teeth and replace them with composite ones.

In the age of social media there is a lot of studies and claims that get thrown around and circulated as fact when they are based on some very inconclusive data.
Posted by Deepwood
Member since Sep 2023
50 posts
Posted on 5/8/25 at 3:25 pm to
Your mouth wash is killing you!!



People like this are who I worry about.

Your mouthwash is killing you, here buy some of this.

And I personally think oil pulling is very dumb.
Posted by BarberitosDawg
Lee County Florida across causeway
Member since Oct 2013
13175 posts
Posted on 5/8/25 at 4:16 pm to
Have you seen European teeth? I don’t know what’s up with that but their teeth in general are in horrible shape. The breath this folks have is most undesirable.
Lack of dentists I don’t know?
Posted by kaleidoscoping
Member since Feb 2021
431 posts
Posted on 6/12/25 at 2:05 pm to
a couple months ago while hiking . The town I live in voted to ban flouride in the city water back in the 90s.
Posted by LRB1967
Tennessee
Member since Dec 2020
22898 posts
Posted on 6/12/25 at 2:29 pm to
Most toothpaste has fluoride and kids get fluoride treatment at the dentist twice a year. I don't see why fluoride has to be in water
Posted by whiskey over ice
Member since Sep 2020
3676 posts
Posted on 6/12/25 at 2:35 pm to
what about poor people who can't afford toothpaste or dentists? seems like this would mostly hurt people of color
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
56860 posts
Posted on 6/12/25 at 2:51 pm to
quote:

There is no health benefit of fluoride in water.


Dental hygiene is pretty positive for your health.

quote:

It can actually damage teeth and bones.


wut?

quote:

It's a toxin and the human body can't really handle it.


Yet, here we all are. Alive today. You realize, just because a "toxin" is in something, doesn't make it harmful. Ever heard of PPM?

quote:

It should have been removed a long time ago.


But it wasn't. Are there flouride related deaths i'm not aware of?
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
56860 posts
Posted on 6/12/25 at 2:54 pm to
quote:

Most toothpaste has fluoride and kids get fluoride treatment at the dentist twice a year. I don't see why fluoride has to be in water


Kind of makes you wonder about those "fluoride is bad for you claims", don't it.

"Flouride in water is bad. Also, your teeth will survive because we have fluoride in our toothpaste and the dentist."

Normal person: If fluoride is bad in water, then why are you getting it at the dentist or in your toothpaste?
Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
30023 posts
Posted on 6/12/25 at 3:04 pm to
quote:

There’s literally no short or long term risk of adverse outcomes if we take it out of the water.


That is likely false.

There was a Canadian study where two fairly large cities (forgot which ones) were compared after one took fluoride out of the tap water. There was a significant increase in childhood cavities in the city that removed it. Heart disease risk goes up significantly with poor oral health. My wife says that, outside of IV drug use oral health is the strongest indication of the root problem for heart valves she replaces in younger patients. This is from infective endocarditis.

I am more or less 50/50 on the idea of removing fluoride but I think there will be unintended consequences either way, there almost always is.

Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
30023 posts
Posted on 6/12/25 at 3:19 pm to
quote:

Fluoride is a disinfectant/sanitizer. It destroys the bacterial biome on the back of your tongue which leads to all manner of cardiovascular problems.
It’s a fascinating process that involves production of nitric oxide. You have probably heard of the importance of nitric oxide production. Fluoride and antibacterial mouth rinses have been wrecking our bodies for decades.


I am friends with quite a few cardiologists and heart surgeons, and they have preached the ills of alcohol based mouthwash for years, but I have never heard one of them mention fluoridated water as an issue. That is almost certainly a molarity issue, but I don't know at what point it shifts from being benign to destructive, and how that compares to the level in drinking water.
Posted by NOBigEZ
Raleigh, NC
Member since Aug 2020
526 posts
Posted on 6/12/25 at 3:25 pm to
Our bodies do not supply blood to the dentin or enamel surfaces of our teeth, making it impossible for digested fluoride to reach them or provide any dental benefits. Furthermore, the fluoride used in toothpaste and mouthwash is toxic, with warnings on every container and box cautioning against ingestion. The only conclusion to draw from the continued presence of fluoride in drinking water is that it serves to harm and not benefit individuals.
Posted by ATrillionaire
Houston
Member since Sep 2008
2266 posts
Posted on 6/12/25 at 3:36 pm to
quote:

The only conclusion to draw from the continued presence of fluoride in drinking water is that it serves to harm and not benefit individuals.

Well, that can't be true. I just read a bunch of differing opinions in this very thread.
Posted by tigeraddict
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2007
14378 posts
Posted on 6/12/25 at 3:38 pm to
BR water does not add fluoride to its water....
This post was edited on 6/12/25 at 3:38 pm
Posted by LRB1967
Tennessee
Member since Dec 2020
22898 posts
Posted on 6/12/25 at 3:38 pm to
quote:

poor people who can't afford toothpaste


I have a couple of dozen tubes of toothpaste at home and they were all free by combining coupons with store promotions. I have not paid for toothpaste since 2008. This is something anyone can do.
Posted by NOBigEZ
Raleigh, NC
Member since Aug 2020
526 posts
Posted on 6/12/25 at 3:40 pm to
quote:

Normal person: If fluoride is bad in water, then why are you getting it at the dentist or in your toothpaste?


Because 100% of the fluoride used at a dental visit is applied topically to the teeth and not ingested into the body. Fluoride from drinking water has no usefulness for dental health because it can not reach the enamel surface of your teeth from your gut.
Posted by NOBigEZ
Raleigh, NC
Member since Aug 2020
526 posts
Posted on 6/12/25 at 3:45 pm to
quote:

Well, that can't be true. I just read a bunch of differing opinions in this very thread.


There is no vascular structure that reaches into the dentin or comes close to the enamel of our teeth. If there is something you ingest into your body but can't reach the location it is intended to support, then why is it there?
Posted by wallowinit
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2006
17071 posts
Posted on 6/12/25 at 5:44 pm to
Why would you think these guys have any special knowledge about a subject that has just really come to light in the last 20 years?
You may hold people with the letters DR in front of their name in a little bit too high regard.
Posted by N2cars
Close by
Member since Feb 2008
37890 posts
Posted on 6/12/25 at 5:47 pm to
No opinion, but RFK is a nut.
Posted by CSATiger
The Battlefield
Member since Aug 2010
6800 posts
Posted on 6/12/25 at 5:51 pm to
I am old enough to remember the raging debates when they first started putting it in. It was a commie plot!
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram