- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 5/8/25 at 3:14 pm to wallowinit
Wasn’t trying to ruffle any feathers. Your claims just seemed a little sensationalized, and when I copied and pasted your post into Google the first thing that came up is someone trying make money by selling products to fix the problems they found doing their own research.
Just wondering if these were claims you saw on Dr. Oz or the today show. While I do understand and agree with the positive affects of nitric oxide, everything I just read seems to be pretty inconclusive at the moment about the negative effects of flouride and mouthwash on the production of nitric oxide on the back of the tongue.
Most of the places I did find a claim of negative impacts were quickly followed up with a health regime, toothpaste, or book, that you could buy to learn more. Just makes me a little skeptical.
Just as I pointed out with landmass’ link to a group of “biological”dentists who publish their own studies so they have “research” to quote as to why you should take the perfectly functional amalgam fillings out of your teeth and replace them with composite ones.
In the age of social media there is a lot of studies and claims that get thrown around and circulated as fact when they are based on some very inconclusive data.
Just wondering if these were claims you saw on Dr. Oz or the today show. While I do understand and agree with the positive affects of nitric oxide, everything I just read seems to be pretty inconclusive at the moment about the negative effects of flouride and mouthwash on the production of nitric oxide on the back of the tongue.
Most of the places I did find a claim of negative impacts were quickly followed up with a health regime, toothpaste, or book, that you could buy to learn more. Just makes me a little skeptical.
Just as I pointed out with landmass’ link to a group of “biological”dentists who publish their own studies so they have “research” to quote as to why you should take the perfectly functional amalgam fillings out of your teeth and replace them with composite ones.
In the age of social media there is a lot of studies and claims that get thrown around and circulated as fact when they are based on some very inconclusive data.
Posted on 5/8/25 at 3:25 pm to wallowinit
Your mouth wash is killing you!!
People like this are who I worry about.
Your mouthwash is killing you, here buy some of this.
And I personally think oil pulling is very dumb.
People like this are who I worry about.
Your mouthwash is killing you, here buy some of this.
And I personally think oil pulling is very dumb.
Posted on 5/8/25 at 4:16 pm to UFFan
Have you seen European teeth? I don’t know what’s up with that but their teeth in general are in horrible shape. The breath this folks have is most undesirable.
Lack of dentists I don’t know?
Lack of dentists I don’t know?
Posted on 6/12/25 at 2:05 pm to baldona
a couple months ago while hiking . The town I live in voted to ban flouride in the city water back in the 90s.
Posted on 6/12/25 at 2:29 pm to UFFan
Most toothpaste has fluoride and kids get fluoride treatment at the dentist twice a year. I don't see why fluoride has to be in water
Posted on 6/12/25 at 2:35 pm to LRB1967
what about poor people who can't afford toothpaste or dentists? seems like this would mostly hurt people of color
Posted on 6/12/25 at 2:51 pm to Landmass
quote:
There is no health benefit of fluoride in water.
Dental hygiene is pretty positive for your health.
quote:
It can actually damage teeth and bones.
wut?
quote:
It's a toxin and the human body can't really handle it.
Yet, here we all are. Alive today. You realize, just because a "toxin" is in something, doesn't make it harmful. Ever heard of PPM?
quote:
It should have been removed a long time ago.
But it wasn't. Are there flouride related deaths i'm not aware of?
Posted on 6/12/25 at 2:54 pm to LRB1967
quote:
Most toothpaste has fluoride and kids get fluoride treatment at the dentist twice a year. I don't see why fluoride has to be in water
Kind of makes you wonder about those "fluoride is bad for you claims", don't it.
"Flouride in water is bad. Also, your teeth will survive because we have fluoride in our toothpaste and the dentist."
Normal person: If fluoride is bad in water, then why are you getting it at the dentist or in your toothpaste?
Posted on 6/12/25 at 3:04 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
There’s literally no short or long term risk of adverse outcomes if we take it out of the water.
That is likely false.
There was a Canadian study where two fairly large cities (forgot which ones) were compared after one took fluoride out of the tap water. There was a significant increase in childhood cavities in the city that removed it. Heart disease risk goes up significantly with poor oral health. My wife says that, outside of IV drug use oral health is the strongest indication of the root problem for heart valves she replaces in younger patients. This is from infective endocarditis.
I am more or less 50/50 on the idea of removing fluoride but I think there will be unintended consequences either way, there almost always is.
Posted on 6/12/25 at 3:19 pm to wallowinit
quote:
Fluoride is a disinfectant/sanitizer. It destroys the bacterial biome on the back of your tongue which leads to all manner of cardiovascular problems.
It’s a fascinating process that involves production of nitric oxide. You have probably heard of the importance of nitric oxide production. Fluoride and antibacterial mouth rinses have been wrecking our bodies for decades.
I am friends with quite a few cardiologists and heart surgeons, and they have preached the ills of alcohol based mouthwash for years, but I have never heard one of them mention fluoridated water as an issue. That is almost certainly a molarity issue, but I don't know at what point it shifts from being benign to destructive, and how that compares to the level in drinking water.
Posted on 6/12/25 at 3:25 pm to UFFan
Our bodies do not supply blood to the dentin or enamel surfaces of our teeth, making it impossible for digested fluoride to reach them or provide any dental benefits. Furthermore, the fluoride used in toothpaste and mouthwash is toxic, with warnings on every container and box cautioning against ingestion. The only conclusion to draw from the continued presence of fluoride in drinking water is that it serves to harm and not benefit individuals.
Posted on 6/12/25 at 3:36 pm to NOBigEZ
quote:
The only conclusion to draw from the continued presence of fluoride in drinking water is that it serves to harm and not benefit individuals.
Well, that can't be true. I just read a bunch of differing opinions in this very thread.
Posted on 6/12/25 at 3:38 pm to UFFan
BR water does not add fluoride to its water....
This post was edited on 6/12/25 at 3:38 pm
Posted on 6/12/25 at 3:38 pm to whiskey over ice
quote:
poor people who can't afford toothpaste
I have a couple of dozen tubes of toothpaste at home and they were all free by combining coupons with store promotions. I have not paid for toothpaste since 2008. This is something anyone can do.
Posted on 6/12/25 at 3:40 pm to BugAC
quote:
Normal person: If fluoride is bad in water, then why are you getting it at the dentist or in your toothpaste?
Because 100% of the fluoride used at a dental visit is applied topically to the teeth and not ingested into the body. Fluoride from drinking water has no usefulness for dental health because it can not reach the enamel surface of your teeth from your gut.
Posted on 6/12/25 at 3:45 pm to ATrillionaire
quote:
Well, that can't be true. I just read a bunch of differing opinions in this very thread.
There is no vascular structure that reaches into the dentin or comes close to the enamel of our teeth. If there is something you ingest into your body but can't reach the location it is intended to support, then why is it there?
Posted on 6/12/25 at 5:44 pm to Obtuse1
Why would you think these guys have any special knowledge about a subject that has just really come to light in the last 20 years?
You may hold people with the letters DR in front of their name in a little bit too high regard.
You may hold people with the letters DR in front of their name in a little bit too high regard.
Posted on 6/12/25 at 5:51 pm to UFFan
I am old enough to remember the raging debates when they first started putting it in. It was a commie plot!
Popular
Back to top


0






