- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: This "walkable cities" thing I keep hearing about...
Posted on 12/22/22 at 2:59 pm to caro81
Posted on 12/22/22 at 2:59 pm to caro81
quote:
Where the vast majority of the city is accessible by foot or public transportation that is reasonable and easy. More than one option for public transportation. Often times being able to completely sustain typically daily living without the need of using those would be ideal. Being able to sustain daily living without owning a personal vehicle would be necessary to be a walkable city.
You can live Uptown in a house or apartment and have everything you need within a 10-15 minute walk. You can live in the WHD in an apartment and essentially have the same. I have done it Uptown. Everything I needed was within walking distance, now sure I still drove every once in a while, but it wasn’t necessary.
ETA: one of me neighbors was a nurse and didn’t own a vehicle for years until she got a job at a hospital that was no longer walking distance.
This post was edited on 12/22/22 at 3:01 pm
Posted on 12/22/22 at 3:01 pm to fightin tigers
Being needlessly pedantic to "win" an argument. what a clown. lmao.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 3:02 pm to Epic Cajun
quote:
ETA: one of me neighbors was a nurse and didn’t own a vehicle for years until she got a job at a hospital that was no longer walking distance.
Most of my neighbors don't have cars, which limits a shitload of stuff they can do.
I suppose if you enjoy staying in the same hood most of the time, and have little adventure, its perfect.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 3:04 pm to jclem11
Not pedantic at all. The point is all of NYC doesn't even live as dense as Manhattan. The rest of America living that dense is just pointless.
American cities don't have the same history or constraints to me limited in the way of European cities. Living that way just because that's how everyone else does in Europe is not a practical reason.
American cities don't have the same history or constraints to me limited in the way of European cities. Living that way just because that's how everyone else does in Europe is not a practical reason.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 3:05 pm to fightin tigers
quote:
Well, it is a bullshite fact, but I am laughing because I am assuming to NYC and still have your facts messed up.
I'm referring to Manhattan specifically, which has an extremely high density per square mile. I'd wager that if we went by city proper, several cities in Asia would have higher densities than most major cities in Europe. I wouldn't consider Dhaka or Kharachi walkable, regardless of their density.
Regardless, you don't need 10,000 people per square mile to effectively use mixed use residential. In fact, outside of the post-war period in the US, it was the norm here too.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 3:07 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Its the people who want to push walkability on those who don't care for it. Its nice to have, if you want it, move somewhere walkable
Which is why I chose West Seattle, as it illustrates you can have both within the same area without really sacrificing anything.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 3:08 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
This is why no one takes you people serious. Nothing but zero sum drama, with no understanding of reality.
In between your little medieval German town and Youngsville, there's a shite load of ground to cover, for us not drama queens.
Perhaps direct that at the OP who thinks there's nothing in between a mcmansion and soviet bloc
Posted on 12/22/22 at 3:09 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
Regardless, you don't need 10,000 people per square mile to effectively use mixed use residential.
You don't, but what is the point of implementing in 400/sq mile?
Posted on 12/22/22 at 3:16 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Most of my neighbors don't have cars, which limits a shitload of stuff they can do. I suppose if you enjoy staying in the same hood most of the time, and have little adventure, it’s perfect.
She owned a bike. It was 5 miles (less than a 30 minute bike ride) to the furthest part of the city she’d want to go. Now sure, if she wanted to leave the city she’d have to rent a car, but that’s not that big of a deal. Also, if the weather was unpleasant she could always jump in a rideshare
Posted on 12/22/22 at 3:19 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
Which is why I chose West Seattle, as it illustrates you can have both within the same area without really sacrificing anything.
Just curious, when did you leave Seattle?
I found walking the streets less pleasant a year ago than it used to be. Homeless and vagrants are taking over.
The environment has a hell of a lot do do with the experience. I suppose I soured on it here because of the homeless. They were uber pushy. Its better since they moved the homeless shite out of downtown.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 3:19 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
I'd rather be able to walk through both. You people are just scared of everything.
I consider S LA weather to be miserable for roughly 2/3rds of the year. Sorry I don’t want to walk around BR or New Orleans in business attire during August.
This post was edited on 12/22/22 at 3:20 pm
Posted on 12/22/22 at 3:20 pm to Epic Cajun
quote:
She owned a bike. It was 5 miles (less than a 30 minute bike ride) to the furthest part of the city she’d want to go.
How much can you carry on a bike? A few pizzas? A box of kitty litter? A case of beer? How many trips do you have to take when getting groceries for the week?
Posted on 12/22/22 at 3:22 pm to Smeg
quote:
How much can you carry on a bike?
Probably $300 in groceries these days.
Going to get groceries isn't a big deal when it is 2 blocks away.
The expense of shopping daily seems to be offset by the amount of waste. In my experience.
This post was edited on 12/22/22 at 3:27 pm
Posted on 12/22/22 at 3:26 pm to Smeg
quote:
How many trips do you have to take when getting groceries for the week?
Most people who I know that live very close to a grocery store don’t shop for the week. I’d usually grab 2-3 days worth of food.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 3:27 pm to fightin tigers
quote:
Going to get groceries isn't a big deal when it is 2 blocks away.
Going to the grocery is a big deal when I have a car. It takes 8 plus trips been and forth from the car in the driveway. Cases of canned drinks, gallons of milk and OJ, bulky packages of paper towels or toilet paper, etc.
I'm convinced you are single people who don't maintain a household.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 3:27 pm to Epic Cajun
quote:
You can walk on the levee, like me!"
Famous last words.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 3:28 pm to fightin tigers
quote:
You don't, but what is the point of implementing in 400/sq mile?
You understand that's exactly the problem? That the predominant mode of urban planning was forcing the strip mall/parking lot system onto the majority of the US in the post-war era. You are insisting that people are forcing one version on people who prefer the other when the reality is that most US cities developed when mixed use wasn't an option. Most US cities have a pretty clear demarcation of where that development began, as linear streets organized in a grid like pattern gave way to more circuitous streets which were developed specifically for the car, and nothing else. Some cities, like Houston and Jacksonville, as well as some older areas like South Florida and LA, developed almost exclusively around the car.
Most of the country lives in areas denser than 400/sq. mi. and we should try to maximize that. We have plenty of options, as again, it isn't as though you can't have areas which accomodate both vehicle and foot traffic. Even in smaller areas, mixed use is good, as it can buttress economic activity and is a good way to develop a sense of community, which is difficult to cultivate in areas dominated by vehicles. There's one example in California which escapes me, but they effectively made their city center more mixed use, with a corresponding increase in the area's economic activity.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 3:29 pm to Smeg
quote:
Going to the grocery is a big deal when I have a car. It takes 8 plus trips been and forth from the car in the driveway. Cases of canned drinks, gallons of milk and OJ, bulky packages of paper towels or toilet paper, etc.
I'm convinced you are single people who don't maintain a household.
My god how fat are you? All this is entirely doable in a denser city. It just sounds like you think it is difficult for some reason.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News