Started By
Message

re: This "walkable cities" thing I keep hearing about...

Posted on 12/22/22 at 2:59 pm to
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
32830 posts
Posted on 12/22/22 at 2:59 pm to
quote:

Where the vast majority of the city is accessible by foot or public transportation that is reasonable and easy. More than one option for public transportation. Often times being able to completely sustain typically daily living without the need of using those would be ideal. Being able to sustain daily living without owning a personal vehicle would be necessary to be a walkable city.

You can live Uptown in a house or apartment and have everything you need within a 10-15 minute walk. You can live in the WHD in an apartment and essentially have the same. I have done it Uptown. Everything I needed was within walking distance, now sure I still drove every once in a while, but it wasn’t necessary.

ETA: one of me neighbors was a nurse and didn’t own a vehicle for years until she got a job at a hospital that was no longer walking distance.
This post was edited on 12/22/22 at 3:01 pm
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
73681 posts
Posted on 12/22/22 at 3:00 pm to
TIL Manhattan is a city.
Posted by jclem11
Neoliberal Shill
Member since Nov 2011
7901 posts
Posted on 12/22/22 at 3:01 pm to
Being needlessly pedantic to "win" an argument. what a clown. lmao.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
262290 posts
Posted on 12/22/22 at 3:02 pm to
quote:



ETA: one of me neighbors was a nurse and didn’t own a vehicle for years until she got a job at a hospital that was no longer walking distance.


Most of my neighbors don't have cars, which limits a shitload of stuff they can do.

I suppose if you enjoy staying in the same hood most of the time, and have little adventure, its perfect.
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
73681 posts
Posted on 12/22/22 at 3:04 pm to
Not pedantic at all. The point is all of NYC doesn't even live as dense as Manhattan. The rest of America living that dense is just pointless.

American cities don't have the same history or constraints to me limited in the way of European cities. Living that way just because that's how everyone else does in Europe is not a practical reason.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
36386 posts
Posted on 12/22/22 at 3:05 pm to
quote:

Well, it is a bullshite fact, but I am laughing because I am assuming to NYC and still have your facts messed up.


I'm referring to Manhattan specifically, which has an extremely high density per square mile. I'd wager that if we went by city proper, several cities in Asia would have higher densities than most major cities in Europe. I wouldn't consider Dhaka or Kharachi walkable, regardless of their density.

Regardless, you don't need 10,000 people per square mile to effectively use mixed use residential. In fact, outside of the post-war period in the US, it was the norm here too.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
36386 posts
Posted on 12/22/22 at 3:07 pm to
quote:


Its the people who want to push walkability on those who don't care for it. Its nice to have, if you want it, move somewhere walkable


Which is why I chose West Seattle, as it illustrates you can have both within the same area without really sacrificing anything.
Posted by keakdasneak
Member since Dec 2006
7137 posts
Posted on 12/22/22 at 3:08 pm to
quote:

This is why no one takes you people serious. Nothing but zero sum drama, with no understanding of reality.

In between your little medieval German town and Youngsville, there's a shite load of ground to cover, for us not drama queens.



Perhaps direct that at the OP who thinks there's nothing in between a mcmansion and soviet bloc
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
73681 posts
Posted on 12/22/22 at 3:09 pm to
quote:

Regardless, you don't need 10,000 people per square mile to effectively use mixed use residential.


You don't, but what is the point of implementing in 400/sq mile?
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
32830 posts
Posted on 12/22/22 at 3:16 pm to
quote:

Most of my neighbors don't have cars, which limits a shitload of stuff they can do. I suppose if you enjoy staying in the same hood most of the time, and have little adventure, it’s perfect.

She owned a bike. It was 5 miles (less than a 30 minute bike ride) to the furthest part of the city she’d want to go. Now sure, if she wanted to leave the city she’d have to rent a car, but that’s not that big of a deal. Also, if the weather was unpleasant she could always jump in a rideshare
Posted by TutHillTiger
Mississippi Alabama
Member since Sep 2010
43700 posts
Posted on 12/22/22 at 3:16 pm to
They are mostly in Europe
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
262290 posts
Posted on 12/22/22 at 3:19 pm to
quote:



Which is why I chose West Seattle, as it illustrates you can have both within the same area without really sacrificing anything.


Just curious, when did you leave Seattle?

I found walking the streets less pleasant a year ago than it used to be. Homeless and vagrants are taking over.

The environment has a hell of a lot do do with the experience. I suppose I soured on it here because of the homeless. They were uber pushy. Its better since they moved the homeless shite out of downtown.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
26824 posts
Posted on 12/22/22 at 3:19 pm to
quote:

I'd rather be able to walk through both. You people are just scared of everything.

I consider S LA weather to be miserable for roughly 2/3rds of the year. Sorry I don’t want to walk around BR or New Orleans in business attire during August.
This post was edited on 12/22/22 at 3:20 pm
Posted by Smeg
Member since Aug 2018
9449 posts
Posted on 12/22/22 at 3:20 pm to
quote:

She owned a bike. It was 5 miles (less than a 30 minute bike ride) to the furthest part of the city she’d want to go.

How much can you carry on a bike? A few pizzas? A box of kitty litter? A case of beer? How many trips do you have to take when getting groceries for the week?
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
73681 posts
Posted on 12/22/22 at 3:22 pm to
quote:

How much can you carry on a bike?


Probably $300 in groceries these days.

Going to get groceries isn't a big deal when it is 2 blocks away.

The expense of shopping daily seems to be offset by the amount of waste. In my experience.
This post was edited on 12/22/22 at 3:27 pm
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
32830 posts
Posted on 12/22/22 at 3:26 pm to
quote:

How many trips do you have to take when getting groceries for the week?

Most people who I know that live very close to a grocery store don’t shop for the week. I’d usually grab 2-3 days worth of food.
Posted by Smeg
Member since Aug 2018
9449 posts
Posted on 12/22/22 at 3:27 pm to
quote:

Going to get groceries isn't a big deal when it is 2 blocks away.


Going to the grocery is a big deal when I have a car. It takes 8 plus trips been and forth from the car in the driveway. Cases of canned drinks, gallons of milk and OJ, bulky packages of paper towels or toilet paper, etc.

I'm convinced you are single people who don't maintain a household.
Posted by sqerty
AP
Member since May 2022
5186 posts
Posted on 12/22/22 at 3:27 pm to
quote:

You can walk on the levee, like me!"


Famous last words.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
36386 posts
Posted on 12/22/22 at 3:28 pm to
quote:

You don't, but what is the point of implementing in 400/sq mile?


You understand that's exactly the problem? That the predominant mode of urban planning was forcing the strip mall/parking lot system onto the majority of the US in the post-war era. You are insisting that people are forcing one version on people who prefer the other when the reality is that most US cities developed when mixed use wasn't an option. Most US cities have a pretty clear demarcation of where that development began, as linear streets organized in a grid like pattern gave way to more circuitous streets which were developed specifically for the car, and nothing else. Some cities, like Houston and Jacksonville, as well as some older areas like South Florida and LA, developed almost exclusively around the car.

Most of the country lives in areas denser than 400/sq. mi. and we should try to maximize that. We have plenty of options, as again, it isn't as though you can't have areas which accomodate both vehicle and foot traffic. Even in smaller areas, mixed use is good, as it can buttress economic activity and is a good way to develop a sense of community, which is difficult to cultivate in areas dominated by vehicles. There's one example in California which escapes me, but they effectively made their city center more mixed use, with a corresponding increase in the area's economic activity.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
36386 posts
Posted on 12/22/22 at 3:29 pm to
quote:

Going to the grocery is a big deal when I have a car. It takes 8 plus trips been and forth from the car in the driveway. Cases of canned drinks, gallons of milk and OJ, bulky packages of paper towels or toilet paper, etc.

I'm convinced you are single people who don't maintain a household.


My god how fat are you? All this is entirely doable in a denser city. It just sounds like you think it is difficult for some reason.
Jump to page
Page First 6 7 8 9 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram