- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: There’s no discussion of William Tate and Critical Race Theory outside of Tigerdroppings
Posted on 5/7/21 at 4:05 pm to phreaknikidd
Posted on 5/7/21 at 4:05 pm to phreaknikidd
quote:
This is a very interesting discussion we seem to be having. The reason the discussion does not presume that this man is competent is not that we don't trust the board to have made a good choice. Given the selection of Sean O'Keefe, King Alexander, and that dentist who used to treat Edwin Edwards, such lack of trust would be reasonable. Instead, the discussion seems to be based on the assumption that Bill Tate is incompetent, unqualified, has no standards, will pull the university down - all because he is black. He is a real intellectual - he went back to earn a master's degree in epidemiology after he was a tenured professor - and a seasoned administrator at universities far above LSU in the pecking order. And as for the suspicion about his critical race theory article . . . the article has been cited almost 7,000 times. The reasoning stands up to scrutiny by peers. For those who say that the board was forced into this situation, my answer is a question: Except for the student member, is there anyone on the board who is without the intestinal fortitude to say no when they think it's necessary? I doubt it. Instead of criticizing Bill Tate out of ignorance, maybe we should be congratulating the board for not hiring someone who didn't have enough strength to stand up to 45's attempts to undermine science or someone who lied on his resume and was silly enough to think he wouldn't get caught and later stupid enough to say it doesn't matter.
Why you hiding behind an alter?
1
Posted on 5/7/21 at 4:13 pm to The Boat
quote:
Tigerdroppings is way ahead of the curve on this one.
TD was way ahead of the curve on the 2020 election theft
it will be another 2 years before America learns the reality of what took place.
Every road to transparency has been blocked...while Democrats get away with saying "the big lie".
in fact, they have banned Trump for all social media for keeping the flames burning...over what happened
our country is in big trouble...in many areas
This post was edited on 5/7/21 at 4:15 pm
Posted on 5/7/21 at 4:15 pm to c on z
quote:
As predicted.
If I wrote the things he did and generalized groups of people. I'd never work in academia again.
This racist gets a promotion.
Posted on 5/7/21 at 4:17 pm to The Boat
It’s because this is a n*zi tr*mp s*pporter website
Posted on 5/7/21 at 4:18 pm to dgnx6
quote:
If I wrote the things he did and generalized groups of people. I'd never work in academia again.
This racist gets a promotion.
Academia is the source of the critical race garbage...
why don't they try scriptures if they want people to change?
Posted on 5/7/21 at 4:18 pm to bonescanner
quote:
Im looking forward to asking my son what the student body is saying about the hire
Must be your wife’s son if you made him go to lsjw instead of the University of Louisiana
Posted on 5/7/21 at 4:21 pm to The Boat
quote:I remember a recent 20 page thread here defending a deported 90 year old Nazi war criminal as well.
There’s no discussion of William Tate and Critical Race Theory outside of Tigerdroppings
Posted on 5/7/21 at 4:22 pm to The Boat
LOLSU going woke, will go broke.
Posted on 5/7/21 at 4:23 pm to The Boat
LSU has made it very clear that they don’t like white males. I understand, and they can shove it. Sports and all.
Posted on 5/7/21 at 4:26 pm to ApexTiger
quote:
Academia is the source of the critical race garbage...
why don't they try scriptures if they want people to change?
I'm a white male, I absolutely couldnt go around saying this stuff.
quote:
Standpoint epistemology: The view that a member of a minority has an authority and ability to speak about racism that members of other racial groups do not have, and that this can expose the racial neutrality of law as false.
It's actually a theme from crt.
Posted on 5/7/21 at 4:27 pm to DownshiftAndFloorIt
quote:
get all my early news from td.com
My parents think I’m a wizard or Nostradamus because I always tell them the next severe weather event that’s a week away or tell them a big news story before it hits the MSM
Thanks TD!
Posted on 5/7/21 at 4:32 pm to sugar71
JFK sitting with a Nazi war criminal that worked for nasa.
Posted on 5/7/21 at 4:32 pm to phreaknikidd
quote:
all because he is black.
And this is why you should be ignored as a race baiter.
The issue people have with him IS NOT his race, it's the fact that all he seems to SEE is race, based on his resume. This same resume, were it the resume of a white man or own would be met with the same level of disdain. His entire career looks like one that is based on dividing rather than today's buzzword, "uniting." And all at a time in our country when it's the lest helpful.
Next time, try harder. As usual, the only ones focused on race are the left in 2021.
Posted on 5/7/21 at 4:34 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
Given the selection of Sean O'Keefe, King Alexander, and that dentist who used to treat Edwin Edwards, such lack of trust would be reasonable.
O'Keefe was sort of an empty suit. Alexander actually left the University worse than when he found it. frick him.
Posted on 5/7/21 at 4:35 pm to phreaknikidd
quote:
- all because he is black.
Has nothing to do with it.
Seriously this statement brands you as intellectually dishonest at worse...colossally foolish at best.
Posted on 5/7/21 at 4:41 pm to phreaknikidd
quote:
Instead, the discussion seems to be based on the assumption that Bill Tate is incompetent, unqualified, has no standards, will pull the university down - all because he is black.
No, that's your assumption. This thread is chock full of the exact reason why everyone is against this pick.
quote:
And as for the suspicion about his critical race theory article
It's not just one article.
quote:
The reasoning stands up to scrutiny by peers.
Yes, peers who already agree with Critical Theory. Getting people who already agree with your philosophy to agree with you again is no grand feat.
The reason people here are against Tate is his proven track record of loyalty to the re-packaged Marxist philosophy of Critical Theory with its swapping of capital for identity (race, gender, etc) as the delineating factor between the proletariat and bourgeoisie. Just like Critical Theory is nothing but repackaged Marxism, Tate is just repackaged F. King. Failure under a new and different name is still failure.
Posted on 5/7/21 at 4:53 pm to Bard
quote:
No, that's your assumption. This thread is chock full of the exact reason why everyone is against this pick.
But this is the default retort, isn't it?
First, be a racist and support CRT as actual science when it's clear it's simply part of the myriad of grievance studies which have taken hold in academia over the past 30 years.
When someone points to your obvious racism, you call THEM a racist for criticizing you, and then double down by suggesting that's exactly why racists hate you and the criticism further proves your point.
Rinse, repeat.
In essence, unless you fully support this hire, or hires like it, you're a racist by default.
Posted on 5/7/21 at 4:55 pm to Bard
quote:
Tate is just repackaged F. King. Failure under a new and different name is still failure.
Remember when everyone here hated F. King all because he was black?
Posted on 5/7/21 at 4:59 pm to GeauxTigerTM
quote:Only if this same standard were applied when it comes to criticism of Israel/ Jews.
And this is why you should be ignored as a race baiter.
Posted on 5/7/21 at 5:02 pm to Bard
quote:
The reasoning stands up to scrutiny by peers.
quote:
Yes, peers who already agree with Critical Theory. Getting people who already agree with your philosophy to agree with you again is no grand feat.
I think the ne Sokal hoax exposed these "peer reviewed" articles as total nonsense when they got their completely made up papers about rape culture in dog parks and their riff on mein kampf published in these "respected" journals.
It's the equivalent of saying your paper about bigfoot is completely legit because it was reviewed and published by the world's foremost bigfoot experts.
Page 5 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News