- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The White House's Tariffs have Ruined Black Friday
Posted on 11/26/25 at 11:06 am to MoarKilometers
Posted on 11/26/25 at 11:06 am to MoarKilometers
quote:
Your threads always amuse me, or at least how red hats gobble up positive news and shite on you for less than favorable news
I can literally smell the hypocrisy
1
Posted on 11/26/25 at 11:08 am to ragincajun03
I have never bought any gifts on Black Friday.
So this will have zero impact on anything in my life.
So this will have zero impact on anything in my life.
Posted on 11/26/25 at 11:08 am to randybobandy
quote:
Less China plastic crap. Great news! Buy local made in Merica.
China is our enemy. I'm glad to see the American obsession with securing cheap made in China products ebbing somewhat.
Posted on 11/26/25 at 11:17 am to RockinDood
quote:
Ooooo what did you get??
It's just a Squier Limited Edition Telecaster.
LINK
I didn't expect much, but it's a really great guitar especially for that price.
Posted on 11/26/25 at 12:20 pm to ragincajun03
Sensationalist headline that isn’t supported by the article content
Sounds like people are budgeting less for gifts due to rise in costs like health insurance which has nothing to do with tariffs
Also claims that retailers will have less bargains due to tariffs then later claims Walmart is hinting at big discounts
Sounds like people are budgeting less for gifts due to rise in costs like health insurance which has nothing to do with tariffs
Also claims that retailers will have less bargains due to tariffs then later claims Walmart is hinting at big discounts
Posted on 11/26/25 at 12:22 pm to ragincajun03
quote:
Sweeney, who is skipping electronics and big buys this year, sticking to shoes, books and kitchenwar
The horror!
Posted on 11/26/25 at 12:25 pm to ragincajun03
To the contrary, I recently saw some STUPID low prices on tv's at walmart. Many items increased in price because of tariffs. That doesn't mean companies don't then give black friday deals, regardless of the year long base price. This was pointless.
Posted on 11/26/25 at 12:26 pm to scottydoesntknow
quote:
They already have been doing that for years.
So you think doubling down on it is better?
Posted on 11/26/25 at 12:54 pm to The Ramp
quote:
I can literally smell the hypocrisy
Figuratively... but i literally found someone who fits the bill.
Posted on 11/26/25 at 1:13 pm to TT9
quote:
give me a trustworthy source
None of them, even Associated Press was facts-only but they even throw extra horseshite into the story
Posted on 11/26/25 at 1:16 pm to ragincajun03
Your continued participation in Black Friday “deals” is why you’re still poor.
The tariffs aren’t to blame.
The tariffs aren’t to blame.
Posted on 11/26/25 at 1:21 pm to hassan whiteside
quote:
So every economist was right about the tariffs. huh interesting
Retard alert. Retard alert.
Posted on 11/26/25 at 1:25 pm to deltaland
quote:
Sensationalist headline that isn’t supported by the article content
When you cater to the LCD, you can do that, daily, over and over and over.
quote:
Sounds like people are budgeting less for gifts due to rise in costs like health insurance which has nothing to do with tariffs
That was done, on purpose, over a decade ago by the group the media loves to lie for. Don't dare point this out. That makes you a racist, somehow.
quote:
Also claims that retailers will have less bargains due to tariffs then later claims Walmart is hinting at big discounts
It isn't just WalMart. I watched three videos last night on the top 50 BF deals at WM, Costco, and Sams. A wide variety of items, many of which are supposedly affected by tarriffs.
When you cater to stupid people, expect stupid articles that lie and manipulate.
Posted on 11/26/25 at 1:27 pm to randybobandy
quote:
Less China plastic crap. Great news! Buy local made in Merica.
Essentially the same flawed argument as minimum wage proponents.
“Made in Merica” is akin to “living wage”.
This post was edited on 11/26/25 at 1:29 pm
Posted on 11/26/25 at 1:47 pm to deltaland
quote:
Also claims that retailers will have less bargains due to tariffs then later claims Walmart is hinting at big discounts
Walmart has been sending us information about pre black Friday sales since the 14th.
Posted on 11/26/25 at 2:06 pm to hassan whiteside
quote:
So every economist was right about the tariffs. huh interesting
401K and personal investment say something different.
Posted on 11/26/25 at 2:09 pm to ragincajun03
Black Friday sales haven’t been good in a decade
Posted on 11/26/25 at 3:04 pm to ragincajun03
Dems and their manipulations.
They are even trying to use the below to imply criminals are not the main source of Trump’s detainees. First they are requiring the illegals detained to be convicted before detainment to be considered a criminal or even perpetrators of crimes including the crime of entering or being in our country illegally, then there is some possible ambiguity on when these “convictions” needed to take place (Oct 1 - Nov 15th), and finally regardless of any possible ambiguity on dates of convictions these are allegedly the detainees for the 1st month and a half of this current 2026 fiscal govt year (and during the shutdown) and not a total for Trump’s presidency. This is shown on chart but ignored by the representative.
Ignores that 22% had been convicted of a crime including some with previous immigration convictions and including traffic pushes it to 27% (not sure if traffic fully defined by this guy) and tried to focus on just convictions of violent crimes. Obviously also ignores being in the country illegally or entering illegally is a crime and doesn’t address at all if any accusations, arrests, or other criminal acts without a conviction prior to their detainment by law enforcement.
Some other points made by others.
No where does any of this remotely proof the Rep’s conclusion:
They are even trying to use the below to imply criminals are not the main source of Trump’s detainees. First they are requiring the illegals detained to be convicted before detainment to be considered a criminal or even perpetrators of crimes including the crime of entering or being in our country illegally, then there is some possible ambiguity on when these “convictions” needed to take place (Oct 1 - Nov 15th), and finally regardless of any possible ambiguity on dates of convictions these are allegedly the detainees for the 1st month and a half of this current 2026 fiscal govt year (and during the shutdown) and not a total for Trump’s presidency. This is shown on chart but ignored by the representative.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. quote:
Only 5 percent of individuals booked into ICE detention had a violent criminal conviction this fiscal year
ICE book-ins into custody, FY 2026, Oct 1 - Nov 15, 2025
Ignores that 22% had been convicted of a crime including some with previous immigration convictions and including traffic pushes it to 27% (not sure if traffic fully defined by this guy) and tried to focus on just convictions of violent crimes. Obviously also ignores being in the country illegally or entering illegally is a crime and doesn’t address at all if any accusations, arrests, or other criminal acts without a conviction prior to their detainment by law enforcement.
Some other points made by others.
quote:
The entire premise of this argument is shockingly dangerous. This guy believes that if someone breaks into your home they should be allowed to stay without consequences as long as they don’t happen to murder or rape you.
quote:
A “no conviction” category doesn’t mean harmless. It means unvetted. When you have no idea who someone is, what they’ve done, or what they’re tied to, that’s not a safety statistic — that’s a national security risk.
No where does any of this remotely proof the Rep’s conclusion:
quote:
“The vast majority of the people being taken are hardworking, law-abiding members of our communities. They are just trying to provide for their families and contribute to America.
Posted on 11/26/25 at 3:08 pm to ragincajun03
My big ticket purchase for black friday sales was 70% off.
Tariffs had no impact here, I wouldn’t have bought shite from Temu (Amazon) anyway.
Tariffs had no impact here, I wouldn’t have bought shite from Temu (Amazon) anyway.
Posted on 11/26/25 at 3:16 pm to MoarKilometers
quote:
Figuratively... but i literally found someone who fits the bill.
Cite that posters reactions to an array of the OP's posts or you did not find shite.
Page 5 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News