Started By
Message

re: The Twitter Files: Biden election suppression - “1A not absolute”- Suppl. Update today p39

Posted on 12/2/22 at 6:11 pm to
Posted by Tyga Woods
South Central Jupiter Island, FL
Member since Sep 2016
38351 posts
Posted on 12/2/22 at 6:11 pm to
Posted by ReadyPlayer1
Clown World
Member since Oct 2020
1082 posts
Posted on 12/2/22 at 6:13 pm to
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
59240 posts
Posted on 12/2/22 at 6:14 pm to
quote:

Twitter has been a DNC mouthpiece for years.

It was created and enabled by intelligence agencies for the sole use of swaying public opinion and controlling the population

Elon broke their toy.

And with FaceBook going full retard, their only big toy left is google
This post was edited on 12/2/22 at 6:16 pm
Posted by Cs
Member since Aug 2008
10613 posts
Posted on 12/2/22 at 6:16 pm to
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
39929 posts
Posted on 12/2/22 at 6:18 pm to
quote:

What were the censored tweets?


It would be nice to know, but the main story is the the Biden regime was using a private company to silence Americans.
Posted by Proximo
Member since Aug 2011
20232 posts
Posted on 12/2/22 at 6:19 pm to





This post was edited on 12/2/22 at 6:29 pm
Posted by wileyjones
Member since May 2014
2612 posts
Posted on 12/2/22 at 6:19 pm to
god damn twitter threads are so fricking hard to follow, horrible user interface
Posted by Breauxsif
Member since May 2012
22291 posts
Posted on 12/2/22 at 6:19 pm to
CRT on z is upset about this
Posted by pankReb
Defending National Champs Fan
Member since Mar 2009
69351 posts
Posted on 12/2/22 at 6:22 pm to
quote:


god damn twitter threads are so fricking hard to follow, horrible user interface




there's literally post numbers to follow.
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
62945 posts
Posted on 12/2/22 at 6:25 pm to
If threadreader still works, that should wrap them up into a thread together.

Tabbi and Greenwald are the motherf'ing GOATs. Honorable mention to Aaron Mate. There is just nobody like these guys in corporate media.
Posted by pankReb
Defending National Champs Fan
Member since Mar 2009
69351 posts
Posted on 12/2/22 at 6:25 pm to


oof.
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
40030 posts
Posted on 12/2/22 at 6:25 pm to
I don’t give two shits what political affiliation the requestor has, the fact that the government has been able to reach out to a free speech platform and ask them to ban people is absolutely fricking infuriating.
Posted by pankReb
Defending National Champs Fan
Member since Mar 2009
69351 posts
Posted on 12/2/22 at 6:27 pm to


They were censoring people without knowing if it even went against policy.
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
62945 posts
Posted on 12/2/22 at 6:29 pm to
This was Taibbi's message to his Substack subscribers. I received this less than an hour ago.
quote:

Note to Readers

It's about to get weird in here. An appeal for your patience

Very shortly, I’m going to begin posting a long thread of information on Twitter, at my account, @mtaibbi. This material is likely to get a lot of attention. I will absolutely understand if subscribers are angry that it is not appearing here on Substack first. I’d be angry, too.

The last 96 hours have been among the most chaotic of my life, involving multiple trips back and forth across the country, with a debate in Canada in between. There’s a long story I hope to be able to tell soon, but can’t, not quite yet anyway. What I can say is that in exchange for the opportunity to cover a unique and explosive story, I had to agree to certain conditions.

Those of you who’ve been here for years know how seriously I take my obligation to this site’s subscribers. On this one occasion, I’m going to have to simply ask you to trust me. As it happens, there may be a few more big surprises coming, and those will be here on Substack. And there will be room here to to discuss this, too, in time. In any case, thanks for your support and your patience, and please hold me to a promise to make all this up to you, and then some.


Posted by Proximo
Member since Aug 2011
20232 posts
Posted on 12/2/22 at 6:30 pm to


This post was edited on 12/2/22 at 6:33 pm
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
62945 posts
Posted on 12/2/22 at 6:30 pm to
Dude, the Intercept had a recent article about this. DHS and big tech had a portal where they communicated about who to ban.
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
117330 posts
Posted on 12/2/22 at 6:31 pm to
Your noted independent schtick is so lame
This post was edited on 12/2/22 at 6:31 pm
Posted by WG_Dawg
Member since Jun 2004
88712 posts
Posted on 12/2/22 at 6:31 pm to
What is substack
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
67043 posts
Posted on 12/2/22 at 6:32 pm to
quote:

They were censoring people without knowing if it even went against policy.

They knew their policy didn't cover it. One of their own lawyers told them as much, but they ignored him and buried it anyway.
This post was edited on 12/2/22 at 6:33 pm
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
40030 posts
Posted on 12/2/22 at 6:32 pm to
quote:




Lessons from 2016? Are they saying they are being extra cautious to allow information to be falsely talked about as in Hillary’s emails being fake or are they saying allowing something to break that could help Trump
Jump to page
Page First 6 7 8 9 10 ... 39
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 39Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram