- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 12/2/22 at 6:14 pm to Highthoughts
quote:
Twitter has been a DNC mouthpiece for years.
It was created and enabled by intelligence agencies for the sole use of swaying public opinion and controlling the population
Elon broke their toy.
And with FaceBook going full retard, their only big toy left is google
This post was edited on 12/2/22 at 6:16 pm
Posted on 12/2/22 at 6:18 pm to whatiknowsofar
quote:
What were the censored tweets?
It would be nice to know, but the main story is the the Biden regime was using a private company to silence Americans.
Posted on 12/2/22 at 6:19 pm to Tyga Woods






This post was edited on 12/2/22 at 6:29 pm
Posted on 12/2/22 at 6:19 pm to Cs
god damn twitter threads are so fricking hard to follow, horrible user interface
Posted on 12/2/22 at 6:19 pm to Proximo
CRT on z is upset about this



Posted on 12/2/22 at 6:22 pm to wileyjones
quote:
god damn twitter threads are so fricking hard to follow, horrible user interface
there's literally post numbers to follow.

Posted on 12/2/22 at 6:25 pm to wileyjones
If threadreader still works, that should wrap them up into a thread together.
Tabbi and Greenwald are the motherf'ing GOATs. Honorable mention to Aaron Mate. There is just nobody like these guys in corporate media.
Tabbi and Greenwald are the motherf'ing GOATs. Honorable mention to Aaron Mate. There is just nobody like these guys in corporate media.
Posted on 12/2/22 at 6:25 pm to pankReb
I don’t give two shits what political affiliation the requestor has, the fact that the government has been able to reach out to a free speech platform and ask them to ban people is absolutely fricking infuriating.
Posted on 12/2/22 at 6:27 pm to pankReb
They were censoring people without knowing if it even went against policy.
Posted on 12/2/22 at 6:29 pm to Tyga Woods
This was Taibbi's message to his Substack subscribers. I received this less than an hour ago.
quote:
Note to Readers
It's about to get weird in here. An appeal for your patience
Very shortly, I’m going to begin posting a long thread of information on Twitter, at my account, @mtaibbi. This material is likely to get a lot of attention. I will absolutely understand if subscribers are angry that it is not appearing here on Substack first. I’d be angry, too.
The last 96 hours have been among the most chaotic of my life, involving multiple trips back and forth across the country, with a debate in Canada in between. There’s a long story I hope to be able to tell soon, but can’t, not quite yet anyway. What I can say is that in exchange for the opportunity to cover a unique and explosive story, I had to agree to certain conditions.
Those of you who’ve been here for years know how seriously I take my obligation to this site’s subscribers. On this one occasion, I’m going to have to simply ask you to trust me. As it happens, there may be a few more big surprises coming, and those will be here on Substack. And there will be room here to to discuss this, too, in time. In any case, thanks for your support and your patience, and please hold me to a promise to make all this up to you, and then some.
Posted on 12/2/22 at 6:30 pm to Bunk Moreland



This post was edited on 12/2/22 at 6:33 pm
Posted on 12/2/22 at 6:30 pm to Oilfieldbiology
Dude, the Intercept had a recent article about this. DHS and big tech had a portal where they communicated about who to ban.
Posted on 12/2/22 at 6:31 pm to Sao
Your noted independent schtick is so lame
This post was edited on 12/2/22 at 6:31 pm
Posted on 12/2/22 at 6:32 pm to pankReb
quote:
They were censoring people without knowing if it even went against policy.
They knew their policy didn't cover it. One of their own lawyers told them as much, but they ignored him and buried it anyway.
This post was edited on 12/2/22 at 6:33 pm
Posted on 12/2/22 at 6:32 pm to pankReb
quote:
Lessons from 2016? Are they saying they are being extra cautious to allow information to be falsely talked about as in Hillary’s emails being fake or are they saying allowing something to break that could help Trump
Back to top
