Started By
Message

re: The Michigan high school shooter's parents are on the run (now arrested and in custody)

Posted on 12/3/21 at 8:38 pm to
Posted by Seldom Seen
Member since Feb 2016
48737 posts
Posted on 12/3/21 at 8:38 pm to
This is what happens when parents aren't allowed to beat their children.
Posted by UndercoverBryologist
Member since Nov 2020
8077 posts
Posted on 12/3/21 at 8:41 pm to
In the book Columbine, Dave Cullen makes some pretty disturbing implications about Eric Harris’s parents. Specifically, it seems, based on his research, that those parents were turning a blind eye to Eric’s behavior.

The Klebolds were not much better off. But they at least acknowledged that Dylan had problems. But they took too damn long to see what was about to happen.
Posted by Ed Osteen
Member since Oct 2007
58820 posts
Posted on 12/3/21 at 8:48 pm to
I had to reread that part too
Posted by dallastigers
Member since Dec 2003
9419 posts
Posted on 12/3/21 at 8:58 pm to
quote:

quote: “Would’ve prompted admin to tell the parents he couldn’t return to school until he was seen and cleared by a mental health professional. Or we would offer to call in a mobile assessment.

It would have also prompted us to search his backpack ourselves. And if the parents refused to get him help, a CPS call would be coming. Security would’ve been called to remove them from the property (kid included) if they didn’t leave when we requested. There’d be no staying at school.”




All of this. It's simply unconscionable he was allowed to step foot back in those school hallways. And I don't want to hear, "oh, the parents wouldn't pull him out". So fricking what! If you expel a kid for something, do you wait for the parents to sign off on the expulsion? Of course not. A threat is a threat. Hundreds of kids' safety comes before the feelings of a single, irresponsible family.



I have seen police involved for less. I find it hard to believe if they presented evidence that kid was about to go off as obviously as DA is making it that they didn’t have police get involved, didn’t force kid to be sent home as making threats against fellow students, and actually gave 48 hours to get counseling. It comes across more as they recommended going home for the day which happens in a lot of situations that aren’t dangerous. If a kid is viewed as homicidal or suicidal you don’t just make recommendation to go home early and get counseling within 48 hours. That is easily dismissed by parents if kid tells them he was joking or copying something from a tv show.

Kid looking up ammunition looks bad after the fact, but I doubt he is only kid looking up that or worse stuff. I also doubt that no one on staff was told or knew about him getting a gun or saw any of the posts on social media. The kid was probably telling people at school. Regardless If school didn’t ask parents about access to guns they aren’t expressing immediate concerns DA is saying. Not even sure if they said go home for 48 hours, so it seemed like take test of day off, start looking at counseling, talk with your kid some, and see you tomorrow at school.

As for gun it is one thing for parents to say they bought kid a gun and let kid post on social media that the parents actually control (regardless of how secure) and kid can only use with one of them until the kid is of age, and it is another to hand it to him to do as he pleases. If parents did the latter that would be reckless.

Parent Checking the backpack would depend on who truly controlled the gun. If parents gave it to kid to do whatever he wanted they should have checked even if they didn’t think he was about to use it as in this scenario they don’t control it. Our kids couldn’t have backpacks at school (not that a handgun couldn’t be stored in some of those mammoth zippered binders or even the string bags), but school could have asked parent for permission to look at anything in situation like that. If they didn’t ask parents they again aren’t showing sense of urgency and danger implied by DA.

The parents may have done everything the DA is implying, but right now the main “proof” is the shootings. I also think a good hard look needs to be done at the schools response if again it was clearly communicated that kid was a threat as DA is implying.
This post was edited on 12/3/21 at 9:09 pm
Posted by Bobby OG Johnson
Member since Apr 2015
32095 posts
Posted on 12/3/21 at 10:15 pm to
Posted by BluegrassBelle
RIP Hefty Lefty - 1981-2019
Member since Nov 2010
106061 posts
Posted on 12/3/21 at 10:29 pm to
quote:

Better start rounding up every teenager with angst that is jamming emo music and making stupid statements like "my life is useless"

Again, it's easy to judge all of this after the fact, but do you know how many kids say shite like this on a daily basis?


Julie with the black clothes and eyeliner may be angsty but it becomes a bit more than emo angst when they’re making videos about killing their classmates to go along with it.
Posted by saintforlife1
Member since Jul 2012
1370 posts
Posted on 12/3/21 at 10:51 pm to
quote:

Brandon's America

That's right. The parents grabbed $4K from the bank and hightailed it out of town in a 2021 SUV because economic axiety, CRT, China and globalization and the elites made them do it. Can't wait to see Tucker Carlson interview them in a diner to get their side of the story.
This post was edited on 12/3/21 at 11:10 pm
Posted by dallastigers
Member since Dec 2003
9419 posts
Posted on 12/3/21 at 11:07 pm to
quote:

quote: “Better start rounding up every teenager with angst that is jamming emo music and making stupid statements like "my life is useless"

Again, it's easy to judge all of this after the fact, but do you know how many kids say shite like this on a daily basis?”


Julie with the black clothes and eyeliner may be angsty but it becomes a bit more than emo angst when they’re making videos about killing their classmates to go along with it.


Did this kid make a video like this that was know beforehand (even if not taken seriously at the time)?
This post was edited on 12/4/21 at 12:32 am
Posted by Street Hawk
Member since Nov 2014
3593 posts
Posted on 12/3/21 at 11:23 pm to
quote:

Rifles and shotguns historically treated very different from handguns fwiw.

In this context, the parents are much more culpable by getting him a handgun than a rifle or shotgun. Especially if you could prove the shotgun or rifle was purchased with hunting in mind.

The charge isn’t “giving a minor gun,” it’s that they contributed to the deaths of the victims through criminally negligent conduct. Which takes a lot more factors into account

It's understandable in a state with deep hunting traditions, buying a youngster a .22 rifle that an adult will use to tutor them on the ethics of hunting and also gun safety. Assuming there is a responsible adult there to carry this all out.

But, who buys a child a 9mm Sig and lets them control its possession? Speaking as a long-time hunter . . a 9mm pistol is NOT a hunting piece. It's an anti-personnel weapon.
Posted by hikingfan
Member since Jun 2013
1757 posts
Posted on 12/3/21 at 11:27 pm to
US Marshals announce reward, release wanted posters for James and Jennifer Crumbley, the parents of the accused Oxford HS (Michigan) shooter.





LINK
Posted by SlickRickerz
Member since Oct 2018
2290 posts
Posted on 12/3/21 at 11:28 pm to
quote:

it’s that they contributed to the deaths of the victims through criminally negligent conduct. Which takes a lot more factors into account

Were the Parents of Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold charged for the Columbine shooting? They were both arrested on felony charges a year before the shooting. Their parents both paid for the internet, computers, and house for them to plot their massacre. It’s a slippery slope to charge the parents in this case, especially when they are trying the kid as an adult. They aren’t legally responsible to make the gun inaccessible in Michigan. The kid acted on his own and should fry for that.
This post was edited on 12/3/21 at 11:33 pm
Posted by autauga
Member since Sep 2015
3684 posts
Posted on 12/3/21 at 11:53 pm to
Car found abandoned in Detroit. LINK

This post was edited on 12/3/21 at 11:56 pm
Posted by dallastigers
Member since Dec 2003
9419 posts
Posted on 12/3/21 at 11:56 pm to
quote:

They were called into the school and basically told their son was contemplating a mess shooting…

They refused to allow him to be sent home.


What you are saying is that school really felt and communicated to parents that the kid was contemplating a mass shooting but then gave parents a choice to keep him in school rest of day or not, to set up counseling within 48 hours not immediately or require any kind of clearance to be in school, didn’t request permission from parents to check backpack, and didn’t report it to police.

Either the nature of what the school truly communicated and emphasized to parents is being exaggerated, or the school handled it so incompetently that those in charge of it at the school should be investigated.
This post was edited on 12/4/21 at 12:34 am
Posted by theducks
Where The Blazers Play
Member since Aug 2013
14210 posts
Posted on 12/3/21 at 11:57 pm to
quote:

So when do we start locking up parents of kids in street gangs?


That’s racist.

ETA: where I grew up it was mostly white trash. But if somebody said stout’s take out loud the left would say that’s racist to suggest.
This post was edited on 12/3/21 at 11:59 pm
Posted by AlonsoWDC
Memphis, where it ain't Ten-a-Key
Member since Aug 2014
9261 posts
Posted on 12/4/21 at 12:29 am to
quote:

Kill the kid and throw the parents in jail for life.


Would you also say this for a minority kid with minority parents?




Always about race with you clowns.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
62379 posts
Posted on 12/4/21 at 12:32 am to
quote:

How is this going to end well for them?


Not sure what you mean. They shouldn't have been charged with anything. How could it ever have ended well for them?
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
62379 posts
Posted on 12/4/21 at 12:33 am to
quote:

She can prosecute my penis.


The "good trouble" shirt lets you know she'd charge you with rape after consensual sex.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
62379 posts
Posted on 12/4/21 at 12:35 am to
quote:

What you are saying is that school really felt and communicated to parents that the kid was contemplating a mass shooting but then gave parents a choice to keep him in school rest of day or not, to set up counseling within 48 hours not immediately or require any kind of clearance to be in school, didn’t request permission from parents to check backpack, and didn’t report it to police.

Either the nature of what the school truly communicated and emphasized to parents is being exaggerated, or the school handled it so incompetently that those in charge of it at the school should be investigated.


All of this. There are a whole lot of morons just eating up the narrative being fed to them.

That narrative gets the school completely off the hook, when in reality it looks like they are completely to blame.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
62379 posts
Posted on 12/4/21 at 12:36 am to
quote:

I think its enough of a question for a jury to decide on the criminal side. Let a jury decide based on the standard of Michigan law.


People who committed no crime shouldn't have to stand trial.
Posted by gizmothepug
Louisiana
Member since Apr 2015
8499 posts
Posted on 12/4/21 at 12:42 am to
quote:

Always about race with you clowns.


Not always, because if this was one of the numerous black on black killings that happen in larger population areas across the country every day then we wouldn’t even be talking about it because no one in the media would give a shite. The facts don’t care about your feelings, why is that so hard to understand?
Jump to page
Page First 4 5 6 7 8 ... 11
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 11Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram