- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 12/3/21 at 8:41 pm to hikingfan
In the book Columbine, Dave Cullen makes some pretty disturbing implications about Eric Harris’s parents. Specifically, it seems, based on his research, that those parents were turning a blind eye to Eric’s behavior.
The Klebolds were not much better off. But they at least acknowledged that Dylan had problems. But they took too damn long to see what was about to happen.
The Klebolds were not much better off. But they at least acknowledged that Dylan had problems. But they took too damn long to see what was about to happen.
Posted on 12/3/21 at 8:48 pm to HammerJackFlash
I had to reread that part too

Posted on 12/3/21 at 8:58 pm to mmmmmbeeer
quote:
quote: “Would’ve prompted admin to tell the parents he couldn’t return to school until he was seen and cleared by a mental health professional. Or we would offer to call in a mobile assessment.
It would have also prompted us to search his backpack ourselves. And if the parents refused to get him help, a CPS call would be coming. Security would’ve been called to remove them from the property (kid included) if they didn’t leave when we requested. There’d be no staying at school.”
All of this. It's simply unconscionable he was allowed to step foot back in those school hallways. And I don't want to hear, "oh, the parents wouldn't pull him out". So fricking what! If you expel a kid for something, do you wait for the parents to sign off on the expulsion? Of course not. A threat is a threat. Hundreds of kids' safety comes before the feelings of a single, irresponsible family.
I have seen police involved for less. I find it hard to believe if they presented evidence that kid was about to go off as obviously as DA is making it that they didn’t have police get involved, didn’t force kid to be sent home as making threats against fellow students, and actually gave 48 hours to get counseling. It comes across more as they recommended going home for the day which happens in a lot of situations that aren’t dangerous. If a kid is viewed as homicidal or suicidal you don’t just make recommendation to go home early and get counseling within 48 hours. That is easily dismissed by parents if kid tells them he was joking or copying something from a tv show.
Kid looking up ammunition looks bad after the fact, but I doubt he is only kid looking up that or worse stuff. I also doubt that no one on staff was told or knew about him getting a gun or saw any of the posts on social media. The kid was probably telling people at school. Regardless If school didn’t ask parents about access to guns they aren’t expressing immediate concerns DA is saying. Not even sure if they said go home for 48 hours, so it seemed like take test of day off, start looking at counseling, talk with your kid some, and see you tomorrow at school.
As for gun it is one thing for parents to say they bought kid a gun and let kid post on social media that the parents actually control (regardless of how secure) and kid can only use with one of them until the kid is of age, and it is another to hand it to him to do as he pleases. If parents did the latter that would be reckless.
Parent Checking the backpack would depend on who truly controlled the gun. If parents gave it to kid to do whatever he wanted they should have checked even if they didn’t think he was about to use it as in this scenario they don’t control it. Our kids couldn’t have backpacks at school (not that a handgun couldn’t be stored in some of those mammoth zippered binders or even the string bags), but school could have asked parent for permission to look at anything in situation like that. If they didn’t ask parents they again aren’t showing sense of urgency and danger implied by DA.
The parents may have done everything the DA is implying, but right now the main “proof” is the shootings. I also think a good hard look needs to be done at the schools response if again it was clearly communicated that kid was a threat as DA is implying.
This post was edited on 12/3/21 at 9:09 pm
Posted on 12/3/21 at 10:29 pm to stout
quote:
Better start rounding up every teenager with angst that is jamming emo music and making stupid statements like "my life is useless"
Again, it's easy to judge all of this after the fact, but do you know how many kids say shite like this on a daily basis?
Julie with the black clothes and eyeliner may be angsty but it becomes a bit more than emo angst when they’re making videos about killing their classmates to go along with it.
Posted on 12/3/21 at 10:51 pm to Meauxjeaux
quote:
Brandon's America
That's right. The parents grabbed $4K from the bank and hightailed it out of town in a 2021 SUV because economic axiety, CRT, China and globalization and the elites made them do it. Can't wait to see Tucker Carlson interview them in a diner to get their side of the story.
This post was edited on 12/3/21 at 11:10 pm
Posted on 12/3/21 at 11:07 pm to BluegrassBelle
quote:
quote: “Better start rounding up every teenager with angst that is jamming emo music and making stupid statements like "my life is useless"
Again, it's easy to judge all of this after the fact, but do you know how many kids say shite like this on a daily basis?”
Julie with the black clothes and eyeliner may be angsty but it becomes a bit more than emo angst when they’re making videos about killing their classmates to go along with it.
Did this kid make a video like this that was know beforehand (even if not taken seriously at the time)?
This post was edited on 12/4/21 at 12:32 am
Posted on 12/3/21 at 11:23 pm to tigerfan88
quote:
Rifles and shotguns historically treated very different from handguns fwiw.
In this context, the parents are much more culpable by getting him a handgun than a rifle or shotgun. Especially if you could prove the shotgun or rifle was purchased with hunting in mind.
The charge isn’t “giving a minor gun,” it’s that they contributed to the deaths of the victims through criminally negligent conduct. Which takes a lot more factors into account
It's understandable in a state with deep hunting traditions, buying a youngster a .22 rifle that an adult will use to tutor them on the ethics of hunting and also gun safety. Assuming there is a responsible adult there to carry this all out.
But, who buys a child a 9mm Sig and lets them control its possession? Speaking as a long-time hunter . . a 9mm pistol is NOT a hunting piece. It's an anti-personnel weapon.
Posted on 12/3/21 at 11:28 pm to tigerfan88
quote:
it’s that they contributed to the deaths of the victims through criminally negligent conduct. Which takes a lot more factors into account
Were the Parents of Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold charged for the Columbine shooting? They were both arrested on felony charges a year before the shooting. Their parents both paid for the internet, computers, and house for them to plot their massacre. It’s a slippery slope to charge the parents in this case, especially when they are trying the kid as an adult. They aren’t legally responsible to make the gun inaccessible in Michigan. The kid acted on his own and should fry for that.
This post was edited on 12/3/21 at 11:33 pm
Posted on 12/3/21 at 11:53 pm to hikingfan
Posted on 12/3/21 at 11:56 pm to tigerfan88
quote:
They were called into the school and basically told their son was contemplating a mess shooting…
They refused to allow him to be sent home.
What you are saying is that school really felt and communicated to parents that the kid was contemplating a mass shooting but then gave parents a choice to keep him in school rest of day or not, to set up counseling within 48 hours not immediately or require any kind of clearance to be in school, didn’t request permission from parents to check backpack, and didn’t report it to police.
Either the nature of what the school truly communicated and emphasized to parents is being exaggerated, or the school handled it so incompetently that those in charge of it at the school should be investigated.
This post was edited on 12/4/21 at 12:34 am
Posted on 12/3/21 at 11:57 pm to stout
quote:
So when do we start locking up parents of kids in street gangs?
That’s racist.
ETA: where I grew up it was mostly white trash. But if somebody said stout’s take out loud the left would say that’s racist to suggest.
This post was edited on 12/3/21 at 11:59 pm
Posted on 12/4/21 at 12:29 am to Centinel
quote:
Kill the kid and throw the parents in jail for life.
Would you also say this for a minority kid with minority parents?
Always about race with you clowns.
Posted on 12/4/21 at 12:32 am to hikingfan
quote:
How is this going to end well for them?
Not sure what you mean. They shouldn't have been charged with anything. How could it ever have ended well for them?
Posted on 12/4/21 at 12:33 am to SteelerBravesDawg
quote:
She can prosecute my penis.
The "good trouble" shirt lets you know she'd charge you with rape after consensual sex.
Posted on 12/4/21 at 12:35 am to dallastigers
quote:
What you are saying is that school really felt and communicated to parents that the kid was contemplating a mass shooting but then gave parents a choice to keep him in school rest of day or not, to set up counseling within 48 hours not immediately or require any kind of clearance to be in school, didn’t request permission from parents to check backpack, and didn’t report it to police.
Either the nature of what the school truly communicated and emphasized to parents is being exaggerated, or the school handled it so incompetently that those in charge of it at the school should be investigated.
All of this. There are a whole lot of morons just eating up the narrative being fed to them.
That narrative gets the school completely off the hook, when in reality it looks like they are completely to blame.
Posted on 12/4/21 at 12:36 am to Duke
quote:
I think its enough of a question for a jury to decide on the criminal side. Let a jury decide based on the standard of Michigan law.
People who committed no crime shouldn't have to stand trial.
Posted on 12/4/21 at 12:42 am to AlonsoWDC
quote:
Always about race with you clowns.
Not always, because if this was one of the numerous black on black killings that happen in larger population areas across the country every day then we wouldn’t even be talking about it because no one in the media would give a shite. The facts don’t care about your feelings, why is that so hard to understand?
Popular
Back to top


0







