re: That feeling when single again...

quote:

---

spackling some girls guts.

---

She can’t get pregnant from anal

quote:

---

most men thrive in solitude

---

= most men thrive on their 14th straight hour Fortnite and Canes

quote:

---

You got dumped?

---

Skillet no

Yikes. This reeks of someone trying to convince themselves they’re glad they got dumped.

quote:

---

Relationships dropping like flies round here lately.

---

Who knew fireworks and freedom were so divisive?

quote:

---

Biologically, almost certainly not

---

Society and biology go hand in hand on this one. The ‘spread your seed’ instinct is an evolutionary remnant that is mostly unneeded for Homo sapiens, hence nearly every sociological system (created by males), seeking to supress it.

Homo Sapiens have a tremendous amount of sexual dimorphism, since we have oversized heads that are still under developed at birth, compensated by nature’s least-ready musculoskeletal system.

If we were ‘meant’ to be single, the females in our species would be like most others in the animal kingdom - i.e. they would be just as big, strong, and fast as the males.

But no, our offspring are useless for an extraordinary amount of time, and require so much special care that we tend to only have one of them at a time (barring a not-too-rare abnormality resulting in two). For the species to do what all good species do - procreate to the point of dominance, our adult females must spend a disproportionate amount of time tending to our young. The counter to that is our males have a unique role in hunting and defense.

The same would happen to dogs if they had puppies one at a time that literally could not walk for 2 years, and it took another 10+ years after that before they hit doggy puberty and could even attempt to keep up with the rest of the pack.

We went like this for 10’s of thousands of years. Only in the past few centuries has society evolved to the point where entire livelihoods can had that don’t require any hunting, physical strength for defense, and eventually - access to more communal children raising options. In additions Homo sapiens role as nature’s dominant species is not at all in question, meaning it’s not an evolutionary disaster to maintain a low birth rate for the time being.

End result, NOW it’s possible, and not disastrous to our species, to live in a perpetual state of immaturity. It’s still not a good idea to raise kids this way though.

I give it 6 weeks before OP posts,"BRB trying to get my girl back".

quote:

---

Brb do whatever you want on the weekends...
Brb look at whichever women you want...
Brb no more mandatory calls/texts...
Brb go anywhere you please, whenever you please...

---

I love being single. and I think you mistakenly overlooked the best benefit:
Slay strange poontang on the reg

quote:

---

End result, NOW it’s possible, and not disastrous to our species, to live in a perpetual state of immaturity.

---

I beg to differ about the “not disastrous to our species” part.

The “perpetual state of immaturity“ in which a not-insignificant percentage of our population has wallowed over the past half century seems to be showing its effects. The non-zero possibility of societal collapse in the US would have potentially devastating global effects. Sure, it wouldn’t wipe out humanity, but it would put an enormous damper on human progress (as well as population).

Of course there would likely be long-term advantages to such a collapse. But the short- and intermediate-term effects would not be pretty.