- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Texas superintendent vows to suspend students who walk out to protest guns
Posted on 2/22/18 at 11:49 am to Boudreaux35
Posted on 2/22/18 at 11:49 am to Boudreaux35
quote:It doesn’t work that way.
I don't think it works that way when pertaining to schools.
There are Supreme Court rulings in regards to public schools.
This post was edited on 2/22/18 at 11:51 am
Posted on 2/22/18 at 11:50 am to TH03
quote:
Wonder why he deleted the post..
What post?
Posted on 2/22/18 at 11:50 am to tigerbutt
quote:
which is funded by the tax payers....and I'm sure most of the taxpayers in Texas support this superintendent as well as I do.
Okay? This is a borderline free speech issue where a government entity is telling people they can't do something.
It's like ignoring the 1st amendment in defense of the 2nd.
Posted on 2/22/18 at 11:50 am to tigerbutt
Can you frickers not read?
quote:
wrote in a now-deleted Facebook post,
Posted on 2/22/18 at 11:53 am to TH03
quote:
Okay? This is a borderline free speech issue where a government entity is telling people they can't do something.
Yep. But since people agree with it in principle on this site, no one will agree with you. But if the opposite occurred with some liberal talking point, people would be up in arms.
This post was edited on 2/22/18 at 11:54 am
Posted on 2/22/18 at 11:54 am to TH03
Large part of the successes in a Texas education is the ISD.
The guy is more beholden to the citizens of his direct district than a politician.
The guy is more beholden to the citizens of his direct district than a politician.
This post was edited on 2/22/18 at 11:57 am
Posted on 2/22/18 at 11:54 am to barry
quote:
Uh, 0 dollars
Texas schools receive state funding based on average daily attendance. Having 500+ out for 3 days would have a pretty large impact on that number.
Posted on 2/22/18 at 11:54 am to TH03
quote:
Okay? This is a borderline free speech issue where a government entity is telling people they can't do something.
It's like ignoring the 1st amendment in defense of the 2nd.
Whether I support the kids' message or not, courts will balance their First Amendment rights against the disruption caused by a mass walkout. If anything, current jurisprudence has been swinging back towards the schools in the interests of "safety".
Posted on 2/22/18 at 11:55 am to TH03
you got me, I was scanning the bottom for the post edits
Posted on 2/22/18 at 11:55 am to trom83
I'd have a protest every Friday starting at lunch time.
Get a good start to the week
Get a good start to the week
Posted on 2/22/18 at 11:56 am to TH03
A number of other school districts in and around the Houston area have said disciplinary action would be taken if kids walked out.
Posted on 2/22/18 at 11:56 am to TH03
quote:
Okay? This is a borderline free speech issue where a government entity is telling people they can't do something.
Not if their attendance policy is correctly worded.
He is literally not telling them they can’t do something. Just that if you skip school to do it, you will be punished. Not for what you did or why, but the act of skipping school.
Like I said, it all depends on how the policy is worded.
Posted on 2/22/18 at 11:57 am to TH03
quote:
Okay? This is a borderline free speech issue where a government entity is telling people they can't do something.
They can protest all they want. There are just consequences to doing it during school.
Just like people can say racist things or other offensive shite but they can get fired from their jobs. There are consequences to choices you make. A good lesson for these virtue signaling kids.
The full post was a pretty good one. Fair and balanced. But I’m sure a bunch of over emotional anti gun loons lost their shite so they took it down.
This post was edited on 2/22/18 at 11:59 am
Posted on 2/22/18 at 12:05 pm to tylercsbn9
quote:
. A good lesson for these virtue signaling kids.
Because any dissenting opinion is now dismissed as virtue signalling
Posted on 2/22/18 at 12:05 pm to trom83
Had the idiot Superintendent simply got involved with the students, he and his entire staff could have facilitated and participated in the protest with the kids. A simple change of narrative - to ensure it's about school safety and not guns - would have led headlines all over the nation, who would applaud him. But leave it to simple-minded authority figures who puff their chests out and miss the forest for the trees...
Posted on 2/22/18 at 12:06 pm to Volvagia
quote:
Not if their attendance policy is correctly worded
Yeah I could see this being the key.
quote:
Whether I support the kids' message or not, courts will balance their First Amendment rights against the disruption caused by a mass walkout. If anything, current jurisprudence has been swinging back towards the schools in the interests of "safety".
I get the saftey angle too, like someone mentioned, schools are responsible if one of these kids gets hit by a car.
Posted on 2/22/18 at 12:08 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
But if the opposite occurred with some liberal talking point, people would be up in arms.
It'd be cuck this cuck that all over the thread if this was a school responding to a gun ban or something
Posted on 2/22/18 at 12:10 pm to trom83
They actually should be in school during school hours. After all, it is school.
Posted on 2/22/18 at 12:10 pm to trom83
Are they protesting guns or just the violence?
Second, while walking out is inherently peaceful speech, it is nonetheless disruptive, and such speech can be curtailed. Wearing black armbands, as a different example, does not disrupt class and is totally acceptable.
Second, while walking out is inherently peaceful speech, it is nonetheless disruptive, and such speech can be curtailed. Wearing black armbands, as a different example, does not disrupt class and is totally acceptable.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News