re: Terrorists Set Teslas On Fire

Man its a good thing old Cool Hand Luke didn't cut the heads off those parking meters because parking ought to be free did it back in the day and not in 2025 or his arse wouldn't have had no egg eating contest at GITMO....

This has been a problem since 9/11 and it was initiated for a reason....so whoever was in charge could label people terrorists and even when they were obviously nothing more than low down criminals they could be prosecuted differently (more easily). Burning cars down ain't an act of terrorism, its a criminal act....the FBI defines domestic terrorism as "Violent, criminal acts committed by individuals and/or groups to further ideological goals stemming from domestic influences, such as those of a political, religious, social, racial, or environmental nature". That is intentionally broad and ambiguous so the state can identify criminal activity as terrorist activity and squash descent and keep the populace under control. They ain't even identified these criminals...hell, they ain't even sure the damned things did not spontaneously combust, it wouldn't be the first time...

Even the FBI admits it is too early to say its an act of terrorism LOL...but no one will report that until they have called it a terrorist act several times to implant the idea in the mind of the public. I get it, its good when this sort of thing happens to those who do not share your world view...the problem is that barring some kind of serious shift in fortunes the pendulum will swing away from current political sentiment and in the not too distant future some other administration will call posting on message boards a terrorist act.....setting cars on fire is a crime no matter your incentive...it is going to take some police work, and probably not a helluva lot of it, to catch these criminals...they can be prosecuted as criminals and no one has to face being ladled a terrorist in the future because someone in Washington don't like them.....

quote:

---

Burning cars down ain't an act of terrorism

---

quote:

---

i disagree

---

Yes, terrorizing owners of a car brand solely due to politics is terrorism.

Terrorism is the use of violence or threats of violence to achieve political, social, or ideological goals.

quote:

---

Yes, terrorizing owners of a car brand solely due to politics is terrorism.

---

It certainly is, no one knows if that's what happened in this case...most likely it is but the fact is no one knows at this point. What we do know is it was either a crime or spontaneous combustion....

The is just you purposely looking the other way when the left shows it’s true nature. Dems did the same with antifada after November 2016 and definitely did the same during summer of love.

Some might be lone wolves acting out their criminal instinct, but even those are being inspired by the left call to action against who they believe to be a Nazi even as we really know the leftist elites are the puppet masters due to Elon possibly costing them billions in tax payer money. With all the Nazi talk during the election and afterwards Teslas weren’t targeted like this until DOGE went after waste and corruption in USAID and EPA grants.

Terrorism - “the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.

Someone on X suggested Elon should buy Harley Davidson and watch these fricks start destroying Bikers' rides.

quote:

---

so this isnt violence to push a political agenda?

---

Do you define the events of January 6th as terrorism?

No. Of course you don’t. Because terrorism, like patriotism or many other variety of -isms, is defined by what does or doesn’t fit your belief system rather than by actually definition.

Facts are feelings and feelings are facts. That’s the world we live in. And both sides are guilty of it.

Those dudes definitely posted on page 1.