Started By
Message

re: Terrorist Attack in London - UPDATE ISIS claims responsibility

Posted on 3/22/17 at 12:14 pm to
Posted by Pettifogger
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Feb 2012
87738 posts
Posted on 3/22/17 at 12:14 pm to
quote:

Everything you listed is technically terrorism but can also fall under spree killings because the acts weren't committed over an ideology. Now some wing nut blowing up an abortion clinic is terrorism in my book.



FWIW I don't think 3/4 incidents would be defined as terrorism by any subject matter expert.
Posted by J Murdah
Member since Jun 2008
40227 posts
Posted on 3/22/17 at 12:14 pm to
Shouldnt a terrorist attack label be reserved for something of a larger magnitude?
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
74578 posts
Posted on 3/22/17 at 12:15 pm to
quote:




Pretty much exactly what we all knew he'd look like if we're just being honest with ourselves.
Posted by BOSCEAUX
Where the Down Boys go.
Member since Mar 2008
53014 posts
Posted on 3/22/17 at 12:15 pm to
quote:

You're right. I am more concerned with mass violence rather than the motivation behind the mass violence. The classification of the act after the fact doesn't concern me if I am a victim.


Not me. People committing violence in the name of religion are impossible to negotiate with. They want to die most of the time.
Posted by Pettifogger
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Feb 2012
87738 posts
Posted on 3/22/17 at 12:15 pm to
quote:

You're right. I am more concerned with mass violence rather than the motivation behind the mass violence.

The classification of the act after the fact doesn't concern me if I am a victim.



That's fine. But it's hard to guard against random crazies doing random, crazy things. People typically just internalize that risk and get on with it.

Ideological inspired terrorism probably scares more people, and is probably more easily addressed directly. Maybe that shouldn't be the case, but it is.
Posted by Ed Osteen
Member since Oct 2007
59344 posts
Posted on 3/22/17 at 12:16 pm to
Catching a round from some dumbass baw in a laffy movie theater would fricking suck. I would rather get shot in a terrorist attack, at least I could get a high school named after me or something
This post was edited on 3/22/17 at 12:16 pm
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
74578 posts
Posted on 3/22/17 at 12:17 pm to
quote:

Shouldnt a terrorist attack label be reserved for something of a larger magnitude?


I'm guessing you've not grasped the "magnatude" of this attack. This guy ran down like 10 people in his car then jumped out and started stabbing a police officer.
Posted by BOSCEAUX
Where the Down Boys go.
Member since Mar 2008
53014 posts
Posted on 3/22/17 at 12:17 pm to
Why take the risk. Letting 1 terrorist in is 1 too many.
Posted by BOSCEAUX
Where the Down Boys go.
Member since Mar 2008
53014 posts
Posted on 3/22/17 at 12:18 pm to
quote:

FWIW I don't think 3/4 incidents would be defined as terrorism by any subject matter expert.


I agree. I was trying to be diplomatic since this is the OT and not the PB
Posted by AbuTheMonkey
Chicago, IL
Member since May 2014
8719 posts
Posted on 3/22/17 at 12:19 pm to
quote:

You're right. I am more concerned with mass violence rather than the motivation behind the mass violence.

The classification of the act after the fact doesn't concern me if I am a victim.



Does motivation not matter?

Better get rid of hate crime laws then.
Posted by Pettifogger
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Feb 2012
87738 posts
Posted on 3/22/17 at 12:20 pm to
quote:

Shouldnt a terrorist attack label be reserved for something of a larger magnitude?



I think terrorism can involve attempted injury to one person. But there has to be a political, religious, or ideological motive that is intended to impact more than just the perpetrator and victim.

Posted by BOSCEAUX
Where the Down Boys go.
Member since Mar 2008
53014 posts
Posted on 3/22/17 at 12:20 pm to
quote:

Shouldnt a terrorist attack label be reserved for something of a larger magnitude?


If ideology driven then a single act of violence is terrorism.
Posted by drewnbrla
The Pool is closed.
Member since Mar 2011
7839 posts
Posted on 3/22/17 at 12:21 pm to
The suspect:

Posted by Rebelgator
Pripyat Bridge
Member since Mar 2010
40186 posts
Posted on 3/22/17 at 12:22 pm to
I mean it just shut down Parliment, forced a controlled evacuation, and killed people. No big deal, right?
Posted by BOSCEAUX
Where the Down Boys go.
Member since Mar 2008
53014 posts
Posted on 3/22/17 at 12:22 pm to
That's a little on the nose.
Posted by tidalmouse
Whatsamotta U.
Member since Jan 2009
30706 posts
Posted on 3/22/17 at 12:23 pm to
Holy shite.

I wonder who's done this.

Prayers go out to our British Friends.
Posted by LesMiles BFF
Lafayette
Member since May 2014
5101 posts
Posted on 3/22/17 at 12:23 pm to
quote:

Ideological inspired terrorism probably scares more people, and is probably more easily addressed directly. Maybe that shouldn't be the case, but it is.


Well by definition "terrorist" classify themselves based on some identifying factor so our TV driven culture makes it easy to target those specific groups. It also allows political opportunist to create boogie men (it's not like these groups don't deserve to be called out), and sidestep issues that are just as important but not as tangible (e.g. Mental health)



But I digress... the point I was making was that if you hear of a mass shooting happening in America then you are just as likely to find out a white dude did it as you are to find out a Muslim did it.
Posted by cas4t
Member since Jan 2010
72195 posts
Posted on 3/22/17 at 12:24 pm to
Rigorous screening has worked. The domestic attacks have come from within. I personally think it's a bit fricked for us to essentially create this mess and then turn away innocent people who are trying to escape the mess we created. There's a reason ISIS has turned to Europe to directly attack, and used an online presence to radicalize Muslims in the US. It isn't very efficient for them to try and send a terrorist over here if it's going to take a year or 2. He could be blowing shite up by this time next week in Paris or London.

What we have been doing is working.
Posted by J Murdah
Member since Jun 2008
40227 posts
Posted on 3/22/17 at 12:26 pm to
Sounds like a disgruntled muslim, not a coordinated and timely attack.
Posted by LesMiles BFF
Lafayette
Member since May 2014
5101 posts
Posted on 3/22/17 at 12:26 pm to
quote:

I agree. I was trying to be diplomatic since this is the OT and not the PB




Your condescension is ruining an otherwise great back and forth and exemplifies why the poli board is a cesspool
Jump to page
Page First 3 4 5 6 7 ... 16
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 16Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram