- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 11/6/25 at 7:18 pm to deltadummy
quote:
You could buy their magazine in the 80s and there were at least three good samples of cologne that you could use for about 20 evenings
You did that, too?
Posted on 11/6/25 at 7:37 pm to Kinderman
White people can’t talk about “jeans/genes”
What a brainwashed loon.
What a brainwashed loon.
Posted on 11/6/25 at 7:38 pm to Kinderman
She can do what she wants to do! Those libtards need to leave that national treasure alone!
Posted on 11/6/25 at 7:40 pm to Buck Magnum
quote:
leave those national treasures
Posted on 11/6/25 at 7:50 pm to Kinderman
quote:
maybe white people shouldn't joke about genetic superiority
Why specifically white people aren't allowed to? Does that imply other races are allowed joke they're genetically superior and only specifically white people can't?
Seems like it's not the joke that's offensive but the spectre of the truth.
Posted on 11/6/25 at 8:21 pm to Kinderman
Sometimes I wonder if some of these companies create these "controversies" because it gives them a lot more for the money spent on the ad. How long has that been? And here is an article about it. They sold a lot of jeans from that ad.
Posted on 11/6/25 at 9:45 pm to Kinderman
GQ used to be a real heterosexual manly man magazine. Now it has stupid woman "reporters" asking stupid questions.
Posted on 11/7/25 at 6:14 am to deltadummy
in the 80s
—a lot has changed in 40 years
—a lot has changed in 40 years
Posted on 11/7/25 at 7:44 am to JohnnyKilroy
quote:
Bruh you're doing it wrong.
I wouldn’t say “wrong”
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/455842284_18454616710012454_1753770761607717999_n-c48f3b5c93da4fc892d6a287ea680ff6.jpg)
Posted on 11/7/25 at 7:55 am to Kinderman
It's actually insane that the takeaway from that ad for some people is that "White people are genetically superior" rather than "Sydney Sweeney has good genetics because she has perfect tits and a fat arse".
Posted on 11/7/25 at 8:02 am to Kinderman
quote:
Stoeffel
Foul beast.
Posted on 11/7/25 at 8:23 am to Kinderman
She's obviously a beauty of a women- but she's also a lot smarter than these goons apparently give her credit for. She speaks for herself and has them figured out.

Posted on 11/7/25 at 8:24 am to GRTiger
quote:
Why did race come up in that interview anyway? Sydney has significantly better genes than that dumbass, and she's white as bird shite.
Hell, Sydney looks more ethnic than the AWFLs who are complaining.
Posted on 11/7/25 at 8:24 am to AncientArousal
quote:
It's actually insane that the takeaway from that ad for some people is that "White people are genetically superior" rather than "Sydney Sweeney has good genetics because she has perfect tits and a fat arse".
I'd argue that I don't even know anyone that was actually enraged about that ad (and I'm a middle-aged white woman). And that it was likely one of those situations where some random person on Twitter bitched about it and then media ran with it to rage bait.
Popular
Back to top


0








