Started By
Message

re: State of Washington school districts go in hard on discipline.

Posted on 3/24/22 at 9:44 am to
Posted by Gravitiger
Member since Jun 2011
12452 posts
Posted on 3/24/22 at 9:44 am to
quote:

The disparate treatment is championed in the name of inclusion. But it’s not just a Clover Park School District controversy.

The culturally responsive policy impacts every Washington school district after Democrats passed a law institutionalizing critical race theory in student discipline.
If you actually read the link, this is 100% false
Posted by TigerOnTheMountain
Higher Elevation
Member since Oct 2014
41773 posts
Posted on 3/24/22 at 9:46 am to
There has never been a race in recorded history that was willing to sacrifice their own children, history, and culture, like the white progressives are doing now. We’re witnessing the most prolific and mainstream cult ever conceived slowly commit mass suicide.
Posted by cable
Member since Oct 2018
9735 posts
Posted on 3/24/22 at 9:54 am to
I'm no expert, but I don't think this would pass a Constitutional challenge. I think a 1L admin law course would probably cover this.
This post was edited on 3/24/22 at 9:56 am
Posted by Gravitiger
Member since Jun 2011
12452 posts
Posted on 3/24/22 at 10:05 am to
quote:

I'm no expert, but I don't think this would pass a Constitutional challenge. I think a 1L admin law course would probably cover this.

It's almost like what is written in the article isn't what is actually happening.
Posted by adamau
Member since Oct 2020
4299 posts
Posted on 3/24/22 at 10:11 am to
mmmkay,

You are happily relying on this singular piece of semantic tripe in the fact sheet of the "law" and totally buying what they are selling.

quote:

Critical race theory is not named in ESSB 5044, nor is any specific curriculum.


While totally ignoring the fact that every single leader of educators in the state is being required to be trained in these concepts of "equity, diversity and inclusion" "CRT is not being NAMED in"
This post was edited on 3/24/22 at 10:12 am
Posted by Gravitiger
Member since Jun 2011
12452 posts
Posted on 3/24/22 at 10:13 am to
I'm not "happily" doing anything.

I'm basing my factual response on the information linked in the OP.

Early childhood, elementary, and secondary educators should be trained on equity, diversity, and inclusion. This seems blatantly obvious.

If you have other contradictory information, please link it.
This post was edited on 3/24/22 at 10:17 am
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
45965 posts
Posted on 3/24/22 at 10:21 am to
quote:

Early childhood, elementary, and secondary educators should be trained on equity, diversity, and inclusion. This seems blatantly obvious.


No, they should not. The concept of Equity alone is 100% pure racism.

Posted by adamau
Member since Oct 2020
4299 posts
Posted on 3/24/22 at 10:21 am to
Exactly like I said every school leader in the state is now required to be trained in this school of thought, but you are right "CRT is not NAMED"


quote:

As a result of the passage of SB 5044 in the 2021 legislative session, school directors are required by law to receive training on the topics of equity, inclusion and cultural proficiency as they relate to education. WSSDA is required by that same law to develop and provide such training.


Here are the concepts:

quote:

A. Recognizing Diversity and Cultivating Inclusion
B. Developing Cultural Proficiency
C. Addressing Opportunity and Outcome Disparities
D. Eliminating Identity Discrimination
E. Dismantling Institutional Racism


FROM WSSDA OnBoard
This post was edited on 3/24/22 at 10:27 am
Posted by Gravitiger
Member since Jun 2011
12452 posts
Posted on 3/24/22 at 10:23 am to
Again, why shouldn't educators be trained on those issues?
Posted by Gravitiger
Member since Jun 2011
12452 posts
Posted on 3/24/22 at 10:23 am to
quote:

No, they should not. The concept of Equity alone is 100% pure racism.

No it isn't
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
45965 posts
Posted on 3/24/22 at 10:24 am to
quote:

Again, why shouldn't educators be trained on those issues?



Because equity is racist?
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
45965 posts
Posted on 3/24/22 at 10:24 am to
quote:

No it isn't


Yes, it most certainly is. You give preference and advantage to a group of people purely based on their race or ethnicity.

That is 100% racism.

Posted by Gravitiger
Member since Jun 2011
12452 posts
Posted on 3/24/22 at 10:25 am to
quote:

Yes, it most certainly is. You give preference and advantage to a group of people purely based on their race or ethnicity.

That is 100% racism.

That's not what equity means

It's also not the generally accepted definition of racism (unless you are acknowledging that systemic racism does in fact exist)
This post was edited on 3/24/22 at 10:30 am
Posted by UKWildcats
Lexington, KY
Member since Mar 2015
19962 posts
Posted on 3/24/22 at 10:26 am to
That's literally open discrimination. In the name of not discriminating. How fricking stupid can you be libs
Posted by Ponchy Tiger
Ponchatoula
Member since Aug 2004
49682 posts
Posted on 3/24/22 at 10:26 am to
It says in the article that the school district will give favorable treatment to racial minorities but earlier it stated that in that district only 28% of the students are white. So I guess they are still giving whitey favorable treatment.
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
45965 posts
Posted on 3/24/22 at 10:30 am to
quote:

That's not what equity means


That is exactly what equity means, and why it has replaced equality.

You denying the fact doesn't change the fact equity is giving someone preference or advantage based on their skin color or ethnicity.
Posted by Gravitiger
Member since Jun 2011
12452 posts
Posted on 3/24/22 at 10:30 am to
quote:

That is exactly what equity means, and why it has replaced equality.

You denying the fact doesn't change the fact equity is giving someone preference or advantage based on their skin color or ethnicity.

Again, no it isn't.

You claiming it doesn't make it true.
This post was edited on 3/24/22 at 10:31 am
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
45965 posts
Posted on 3/24/22 at 10:31 am to
quote:

You claiming it doesn't make it true



Then define equity, and why it's more important than equality.
Posted by Gravitiger
Member since Jun 2011
12452 posts
Posted on 3/24/22 at 10:31 am to
See Webster's dictionary. You won't find any allusion to race.
This post was edited on 3/24/22 at 10:33 am
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
45965 posts
Posted on 3/24/22 at 10:32 am to
No, I want you to define it in your words. Since you are saying my definition is incorrect.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram