- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: State of Washington school districts go in hard on discipline.
Posted on 3/24/22 at 9:44 am to adamau
Posted on 3/24/22 at 9:44 am to adamau
quote:If you actually read the link, this is 100% false
The disparate treatment is championed in the name of inclusion. But it’s not just a Clover Park School District controversy.
The culturally responsive policy impacts every Washington school district after Democrats passed a law institutionalizing critical race theory in student discipline.
Posted on 3/24/22 at 9:46 am to adamau
There has never been a race in recorded history that was willing to sacrifice their own children, history, and culture, like the white progressives are doing now. We’re witnessing the most prolific and mainstream cult ever conceived slowly commit mass suicide.
Posted on 3/24/22 at 9:54 am to adamau
I'm no expert, but I don't think this would pass a Constitutional challenge. I think a 1L admin law course would probably cover this.
This post was edited on 3/24/22 at 9:56 am
Posted on 3/24/22 at 10:05 am to cable
quote:It's almost like what is written in the article isn't what is actually happening.
I'm no expert, but I don't think this would pass a Constitutional challenge. I think a 1L admin law course would probably cover this.
Posted on 3/24/22 at 10:11 am to Gravitiger
mmmkay,
You are happily relying on this singular piece of semantic tripe in the fact sheet of the "law" and totally buying what they are selling.
While totally ignoring the fact that every single leader of educators in the state is being required to be trained in these concepts of "equity, diversity and inclusion" "CRT is not being NAMED in"
You are happily relying on this singular piece of semantic tripe in the fact sheet of the "law" and totally buying what they are selling.
quote:
Critical race theory is not named in ESSB 5044, nor is any specific curriculum.
While totally ignoring the fact that every single leader of educators in the state is being required to be trained in these concepts of "equity, diversity and inclusion" "CRT is not being NAMED in"
This post was edited on 3/24/22 at 10:12 am
Posted on 3/24/22 at 10:13 am to adamau
I'm not "happily" doing anything.
I'm basing my factual response on the information linked in the OP.
Early childhood, elementary, and secondary educators should be trained on equity, diversity, and inclusion. This seems blatantly obvious.
If you have other contradictory information, please link it.
I'm basing my factual response on the information linked in the OP.
Early childhood, elementary, and secondary educators should be trained on equity, diversity, and inclusion. This seems blatantly obvious.
If you have other contradictory information, please link it.
This post was edited on 3/24/22 at 10:17 am
Posted on 3/24/22 at 10:21 am to Gravitiger
quote:
Early childhood, elementary, and secondary educators should be trained on equity, diversity, and inclusion. This seems blatantly obvious.
No, they should not. The concept of Equity alone is 100% pure racism.
Posted on 3/24/22 at 10:21 am to Gravitiger
Exactly like I said every school leader in the state is now required to be trained in this school of thought, but you are right "CRT is not NAMED"
Here are the concepts:
FROM WSSDA OnBoard
quote:
As a result of the passage of SB 5044 in the 2021 legislative session, school directors are required by law to receive training on the topics of equity, inclusion and cultural proficiency as they relate to education. WSSDA is required by that same law to develop and provide such training.
Here are the concepts:
quote:
A. Recognizing Diversity and Cultivating Inclusion
B. Developing Cultural Proficiency
C. Addressing Opportunity and Outcome Disparities
D. Eliminating Identity Discrimination
E. Dismantling Institutional Racism
FROM WSSDA OnBoard
This post was edited on 3/24/22 at 10:27 am
Posted on 3/24/22 at 10:23 am to adamau
Again, why shouldn't educators be trained on those issues?
Posted on 3/24/22 at 10:23 am to Centinel
quote:No it isn't
No, they should not. The concept of Equity alone is 100% pure racism.
Posted on 3/24/22 at 10:24 am to Gravitiger
quote:
Again, why shouldn't educators be trained on those issues?
Because equity is racist?
Posted on 3/24/22 at 10:24 am to Gravitiger
quote:
No it isn't
Yes, it most certainly is. You give preference and advantage to a group of people purely based on their race or ethnicity.
That is 100% racism.
Posted on 3/24/22 at 10:25 am to Centinel
quote:That's not what equity means
Yes, it most certainly is. You give preference and advantage to a group of people purely based on their race or ethnicity.
That is 100% racism.
It's also not the generally accepted definition of racism (unless you are acknowledging that systemic racism does in fact exist)
This post was edited on 3/24/22 at 10:30 am
Posted on 3/24/22 at 10:26 am to adamau
That's literally open discrimination. In the name of not discriminating. How fricking stupid can you be libs
Posted on 3/24/22 at 10:26 am to adamau
It says in the article that the school district will give favorable treatment to racial minorities but earlier it stated that in that district only 28% of the students are white. So I guess they are still giving whitey favorable treatment.
Posted on 3/24/22 at 10:30 am to Gravitiger
quote:
That's not what equity means
That is exactly what equity means, and why it has replaced equality.
You denying the fact doesn't change the fact equity is giving someone preference or advantage based on their skin color or ethnicity.
Posted on 3/24/22 at 10:30 am to Centinel
quote:Again, no it isn't.
That is exactly what equity means, and why it has replaced equality.
You denying the fact doesn't change the fact equity is giving someone preference or advantage based on their skin color or ethnicity.
You claiming it doesn't make it true.
This post was edited on 3/24/22 at 10:31 am
Posted on 3/24/22 at 10:31 am to Gravitiger
quote:
You claiming it doesn't make it true
Then define equity, and why it's more important than equality.
Posted on 3/24/22 at 10:31 am to Centinel
See Webster's dictionary. You won't find any allusion to race.
This post was edited on 3/24/22 at 10:33 am
Posted on 3/24/22 at 10:32 am to Gravitiger
No, I want you to define it in your words. Since you are saying my definition is incorrect.
Popular
Back to top


1





