re: Starting to Dig Women with tattoos - NSFW

I'm alright with tats that aren't on their face or neck. I just don't like the facial piercings/gauges.

IWHI but I ain't dating it. She better open her own business because corporate America doesn't like tats.

quote:

---

would you party with a bunch of gays if the drinks were free?

---

One of the more interesting riddles I've ever seen on the OT

Trashy as frick

quote:

---

would you party with a bunch of gays if the drinks were free?

---

If I drank I would. Why not?

I was thinking about making a "titles of threads youd see if TD were uncensored" thread.

And I think one of them would be, "would you party with gays..if the drinks and drugs are free?"


But I'm too lazy to do such things.

The question of whether you “would or would not” when it comes to a chick with too many tats is completely irrelevant, as it always is in these discussions. The question really is whether having very obtrusive, conspicuous tats is an upgrade or a downgrade. I really do feel sorry for anybody who thinks it’s a good thing. Especially on an already beautiful woman, it’s an absolute travesty.

If a beautiful woman is the ultimate natural work of art, it’s infinitely arrogant and foolhardy for all involved (the tattoo artist and the recipient) to presume they can improve upon it with a bunch of third rate doodling that probably wouldn’t be worthy to frame and hang on a wall, much less to be stuck with for the rest of one’s life.

I personally rate it as being in even poorer taste than a black velvet painting. Mainly because if you ever (improbably) acquire any taste you can at least toss the painting out in the trash where it belongs.

They have a higher pain tolerance.