- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: St Louis: Unarmed teen shot and killed by police, riot in progress.
Posted on 8/19/14 at 2:01 pm to reedus23
Posted on 8/19/14 at 2:01 pm to reedus23
quote:
Release it earlier and witnesses say what? MB hit the officer? Ok, great, they just became a witness for the prosecution.
I'm pretty sure they weren't concerned with extra witnesses for the prosecution.
NVM I believe I misread. But see my above post. Everyone seems to forget the timeline.
This post was edited on 8/19/14 at 2:04 pm
Posted on 8/19/14 at 2:02 pm to Langston
They are blasting this guy doing the PC on the new shooting because they didn't use tasers.
Posted on 8/19/14 at 2:02 pm to munchman
It's terrible.
Someone posted this a while back but it is 100% true ......imagine what other countries think about us giving so much attention to just 12 to 13% of the population.
It's almost comical.
You'll throw up if you spent too much time thinking about it.
Someone posted this a while back but it is 100% true ......imagine what other countries think about us giving so much attention to just 12 to 13% of the population.
It's almost comical.
You'll throw up if you spent too much time thinking about it.
Posted on 8/19/14 at 2:02 pm to Langston
quote:
Because they are similar right. One cop on scene, unarmed suspect, but they can't both be legitimate use of force?
Real case study here is if protest will start early enough to prove the LE guilty.
Posted on 8/19/14 at 2:03 pm to Topwater Trout
quote:
protest should have a clear message though...this one doesn't. They are all over the place.
I agree. Their message has been clouded from day one. Is it race? Is it police brutality? Is it simply expressing distrust/hatred for a law enforcement department that they feel has been overly oppressive for a long time? Is it about justice? No one clear message. Doesn't mean you can't say it. Just means no one will take up your cause in the bigger picture if they don't understand what you're saying. Again, cross the line to violence because you don't have a message, and the game changes.
Posted on 8/19/14 at 2:03 pm to Langston
quote:
Because they are similar right. One cop on scene, unarmed suspect, but they can't both be legitimate use of force?
I think they both appear to be legitimate uses of force.
Posted on 8/19/14 at 2:03 pm to Lsut81
quote:
About the shooting a min ago:
These officers are damn good shots. All kill shots.
Posted on 8/19/14 at 2:04 pm to igoringa
quote:
Ferg cops blew the presentation and communication of information big time.
Fuel to a fire that was started too soon.
Posted on 8/19/14 at 2:04 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
Dude handled that PC like a dang boss
Have you not told your officers to use restraing in situations like these due to what happened in Ferguson?
Sir do you think an officer should have a reasonable expectation to go home safe at night to see his family?
Sir are you putting this information out quickly due to Ferguson?
ARe you from around here? Oh your not, well obviously you don't know that this is how we handle situations in this city.
Have you not told your officers to use restraing in situations like these due to what happened in Ferguson?
Sir do you think an officer should have a reasonable expectation to go home safe at night to see his family?
Sir are you putting this information out quickly due to Ferguson?
ARe you from around here? Oh your not, well obviously you don't know that this is how we handle situations in this city.
This post was edited on 8/19/14 at 2:07 pm
Posted on 8/19/14 at 2:04 pm to TJG210
quote:
Is this confirmed or like the other phantom shootings over the past couple days?
Confirmed but unrelated. Was a few pages back. Dude went into store with knife. Cops called. Dude refuses to put knife down. Cops shoot. Another day in STL.
Posted on 8/19/14 at 2:04 pm to munchman
quote:
These officers are damn good shots. All kill shots.
Suspect was within 3 feet, so I would hope they hit him.
Police say that a local alderman witnessed it go down. Sounds 100% justified
Posted on 8/19/14 at 2:04 pm to the808bass
quote:
Because they are similar right. One cop on scene, unarmed suspect, but they can't both be legitimate use of force?
I think they both appear to be legitimate uses of force.
I agree but very different circumstances than last week.
Posted on 8/19/14 at 2:05 pm to beebefootballfan
quote:
Dude handled that PC like a dang boss
No shite
"Are you from here?"
"No, I'm not"
"Well this is how we handle things in St Louis"
This post was edited on 8/19/14 at 2:06 pm
Posted on 8/19/14 at 2:06 pm to the808bass
quote:
Here's an interesting case study. Let's compare the response to the latest shooting to the one in Ferguson and see what's different with respect to outcomes.
Like I said. City knows what it's doing when it comes to officer involved shootings. No worries on this one. Though, it's close proximity is a bit concerning.
Posted on 8/19/14 at 2:07 pm to Langston
quote:
I agree but very different circumstances than last week.
Yes and no. Every officer involved shooting is so different. Both seem justifiable. Within 10 minutes of the shooting, we know the person shot was armed with a knife and involved in a theft.
Posted on 8/19/14 at 2:07 pm to arseinclarse
I hope he's directing that sign towards his peers and not the police. Because he has waaaaaaaaay more to fear from them than the police. Sure, do the police treat black men like shite? Yes but they don't kill them like black men kill each other. Face reality.
Posted on 8/19/14 at 2:07 pm to Lsut81
quote:
Speaking about how the secrecy of a Grand Jury is going to piss people in the community off.
McCulloch has already gone on record that he's going to release the info even if no indictment handed down. Unless it was posted wrong, at least more info will be available.
Back to top


1




