- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Spinoff thread: What questions do you have about 9/11?
Posted on 3/14/15 at 11:32 pm to bmy
Posted on 3/14/15 at 11:32 pm to bmy
quote:Or, for plausible denial, were sent to read goat stories to school children.
A more simple explanation is that (like Pearl Harbor) a select few in our government turned the other way
Posted on 3/14/15 at 11:34 pm to bmy
I'm not opposed to that line of thinking. I'm really not. I don't think the government is perfect and I accept that it's possible they "let it happen" (although I would tend to believe if they knew the ramifications of how bad it would be they wouldn't have.) I won't sit here and tell you that didn't happen.
But I will say it's really annoying when people say the buildings were subject to controlled demolition when we saw them get hit by planes. You can clearly watch a video of the south tower collapsing and see exactly where the structure collapses, right at the point where the jet hit. I mean it's right there-plane flies into building, building fails exactly where plane hit. I cannot possibly be swayed that didn't happen. It would be like someone telling me LSU didn't actually lose to Bama in overtime last year. What do you mean, I saw it happen!
But I will say it's really annoying when people say the buildings were subject to controlled demolition when we saw them get hit by planes. You can clearly watch a video of the south tower collapsing and see exactly where the structure collapses, right at the point where the jet hit. I mean it's right there-plane flies into building, building fails exactly where plane hit. I cannot possibly be swayed that didn't happen. It would be like someone telling me LSU didn't actually lose to Bama in overtime last year. What do you mean, I saw it happen!
Posted on 3/14/15 at 11:35 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
Or, for plausible denial, were sent to read goat stories to school children.
Oh for fricks sake.
Posted on 3/14/15 at 11:38 pm to lsucoonass
quote:
Why hasn't tx tiger answered any of my nut job questions?
His SOP in these threads is to reply to the softball questions or things he can twist around and stay away from the hard facts people bring up.
Posted on 3/14/15 at 11:40 pm to The Boat
bengal96 is actually a lot more far gone than TX Tiger, but at least he doesn't hide his true thoughts. TX Tiger likes to speak in some sort of cryptic beat-around-the-bush language
Posted on 3/14/15 at 11:43 pm to Bengal96
quote:I do agree with this. If he really was on dialysis at the time of the 9/11 attacks and in the mountains hiding, there is no fricking way he was still alive when Obama said we killed him. Then the way the body was disposed of so quickly and the deaths of SEAL team 6 smells of shite. That motherfricker had been dead...Or we had him and tortured his arse until he gave up the rest of the turds we flushed.
LOL, when did we kill Bin Laden?? Did you see his body? His kidneys were barely functioning before 9/11, so did he go from cave to cave orchestrating these attacks with his dialysis machine??? So we dump a white blanket into the ocean and SEAL Team 6 all of a sudden dies in a helicopter crash after this raid on Bin Ladens compound? Give me a fricking break. This is sickening.
ETA-I figure we had him and let him live his life in peace and comfort. In return, he agreed to keep silent and be the boogie man we needed. Then, when he died we could "kill" him and throw a little party.
[quote]LOL, when did we kill Bin Laden?? Did you see his body? His kidneys were barely functioning before 9/11, so did he go from cave to cave orchestrating these attacks with his dialysis machine??? So we dump a white blanket into the ocean and SEAL Team 6 all of a sudden dies in a helicopter crash after this raid on Bin Ladens compound? Give me a fricking break. This is sickening.
This post was edited on 3/14/15 at 11:46 pm
Posted on 3/14/15 at 11:44 pm to bmy
quote:They even put it in writing:
A more simple explanation is that (like Pearl Harbor) a select few in our government turned the other way and allowed ourselves to be attacked to help garner public support for a war they did not want.
quote:
"this process of transformation is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event - like a new Pearl Harbor."
Posted on 3/14/15 at 11:57 pm to SmackoverHawg
The size of DEVGRU, or SEAL Team 6, is classified, but it's generally accepted that there is more than one squadron - Red, White, etc.
Allegedly, about 21 to 24 SEALs were involved in the UBL raid. Presumably, these operators were all DEVGRU. The Chinook shootdown three months later killed 38, including 22 SEALs, five of whom were part of DEVGRU. So, by my logic, five of the KIA MAY have been on the UBL raid, IF they were even from the same DEVGRU squadron.
I would hardly call this wiping out the SEAL Team 6 members involved in the UBL raid.
Allegedly, about 21 to 24 SEALs were involved in the UBL raid. Presumably, these operators were all DEVGRU. The Chinook shootdown three months later killed 38, including 22 SEALs, five of whom were part of DEVGRU. So, by my logic, five of the KIA MAY have been on the UBL raid, IF they were even from the same DEVGRU squadron.
I would hardly call this wiping out the SEAL Team 6 members involved in the UBL raid.
Posted on 3/15/15 at 12:04 am to The Boat
quote:
His SOP in these threads is to reply to the softball questions or things he can twist around and stay away from the hard facts people bring up.
In other words, TX Tiger is a cowardly chicken shite.
Posted on 3/15/15 at 12:05 am to White Roach
quote:
would hardly call this wiping out the SEAL Team 6 members involved in the UBL raid.
That's fine. Still don't explain how someone on dialysis survived that long in those conditions. You really think they killed HIM when they say they did? Or was the info about his original health condition wrong?
Posted on 3/15/15 at 12:19 am to SmackoverHawg
I thought the dialysis rumors were pretty specious going back to just after Tora Bora. It seemed implausible to me that a guy in such allegedly poor health could walk across 10,000 or 12,000' mountain passes. But there was so much "information" bring reported, it was hard to know what to believe.
As far as the Abottabad raid goes, I believe it happened. If they killed UBL, and especially the disposition of his body, are open for debate. I'd like to think the CIA has had him locked up in a cold dark place for the past four years while poking his nuts with a cattle prod, but I can't be certain of that. Wishful thinking, I suppose. (Full Disclosure: I believe in the "19 Muslim cave dwellers" conspiracy theory.)
As far as the Abottabad raid goes, I believe it happened. If they killed UBL, and especially the disposition of his body, are open for debate. I'd like to think the CIA has had him locked up in a cold dark place for the past four years while poking his nuts with a cattle prod, but I can't be certain of that. Wishful thinking, I suppose. (Full Disclosure: I believe in the "19 Muslim cave dwellers" conspiracy theory.)
Posted on 3/15/15 at 12:53 am to Bengal96
quote:And what about the testimony of whistleblower Sibel Edmonds, a Turkish translator working for the FBI, who claimed to have evidence that Bin Laden had been working as an operative (Tim Osman) for the American government all the way up to the day of 9/11?
LOL, when did we kill Bin Laden?? Did you see his body? His kidneys were barely functioning before 9/11, so did he go from cave to cave orchestrating these attacks with his dialysis machine???
I'm sure the highly informed of this thread will disregard her, but the government sure didn't. They put a 5-year gag order on her. You don't do that to someone who has nothing to say.
Posted on 3/15/15 at 1:34 am to TX Tiger
I'm curious, how do you determine who is carrying the government's water and who Isn't?
How can you believe that this Turkish translator isn't in on it too?
How can you believe that this Turkish translator isn't in on it too?
Posted on 3/15/15 at 9:47 am to TheIndulger
quote:
But I will say it's really annoying when people say the buildings were subject to controlled demolition when we saw them get hit by planes. You can clearly watch a video of the south tower collapsing and see exactly where the structure collapses, right at the point where the jet hit. I mean it's right there-plane flies into building, building fails exactly where plane hit. I cannot possibly be swayed that didn't happen. It would be like someone telling me LSU didn't actually lose to Bama in overtime last year. What do you mean, I saw it happen!
Dude what you are missing here is all three buildings fell at FREE FALL speed which means all the core structural support had to be destroyed. Thats what demolition does. This doesn't happen from a plane hitting the building. We all saw the planes, nobody is disputing that. No high rise in history has collapsed because of a fire and no high rise has ever collapsed in free fall in its own footprint without a controlled demolition until 9/11. Spin it how you want, watch the evidence on ae911truth.org. You may not agree, but at the very least its interesting. As TX Tiger said, the 7 story was a joke. They were interviewing people on camera and you could hear the explosions in the sum bitch behind them, even the firefighters described how they came straight down so fast.
Posted on 3/15/15 at 9:54 am to Teddy Ruxpin
quote:Excellent question.
I'm curious, how do you determine who is carrying the government's water and who Isn't?
How can you believe that this Turkish translator isn't in on it too?
The fact is you don't know who is and who isn't carrying the government's water. And that's why I'm a skeptic.
What I do know is that throughout history governments have lied, cheated and stolen from its citizens.
What I do know is that throughout history greedy bastards have used unwitting people to do their dirtywork while they pocket the spoils.
There are these and other basic "truths" that you generally accept and go from there.
I'm 100 percent positive that the government lied to us about 9/11. After that, there are literally thousands of questions yet unanswered, and I suspect will always remain unanswered.
Posted on 3/15/15 at 10:25 am to Bengal96
quote:I feel sorry for all those demolition companies who have wasted all that time and money on wiring detonations.
Dude what you are missing here is all three buildings fell at FREE FALL speed which means all the core structural support had to be destroyed. Thats what demolition does.
You know they have to feel silly in realizing after 9/11 that all this time all they had to do was set a building on fire and it would fall basically into its own footprint.
Posted on 3/15/15 at 10:30 am to TX Tiger
Yep, burn a few office furnishings from Office Depot and stand back
Never thought of it that way, guess its due to me being "farther gone" than you 
This post was edited on 3/15/15 at 10:30 am
Posted on 3/15/15 at 10:33 am to Bengal96
The NIST disagrees with you.
Posted on 3/15/15 at 10:34 am to TX Tiger
quote:
I'm 100 percent positive that the government lied to us about 9/11.
The problem is, you take a very reasonable premise, such as the one above, which I'm sure many people could agree with, and take it deeper and deeper, thus showing your bias.
I guarantee they've lied to us about certain aspects of it. That doesn't mean they planted bombs. That doesn't mean the planes were fake. That doesn't mean it was some elaborate scheme to make trillions of dollars. Are those things possible? Sure, anything is possible, but holding these as truths (which you will deny, but it's obvious through your posts that you truly believe these things) is nonsensical.
It's like blaming your lights flickering on ghosts. Could it be ghosts? Perhaps, but isn't the more plausible explanation that there are wiring issues?
Popular
Back to top



1







