- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 5/27/25 at 9:44 pm to rt3
Posted on 5/28/25 at 5:07 am to rt3
At this point, NASA has a better success rate.
Posted on 5/28/25 at 5:11 am to fightin tigers
Stick to DOGE elon
Posted on 5/28/25 at 5:31 am to rt3
He is not afraid to fail which is something I admire. I see a lot of paralysis in the chemical industry. People seem to expect perfect success or nothing at all. That’s a loser mentality in my opinion
Posted on 5/28/25 at 6:22 am to jamiegla1
He builds his liberal cars that run off electricity to try to put us oilfield guys out of business but what does he use in his spaceship pet project? Good ol American gasoline
He should have to make the rockets electric
He should have to make the rockets electric
Posted on 5/28/25 at 6:25 am to el Gaucho
That idiot won’t even buy Standard Lithium. He could literally travel to Mars with one super sack of dilithium crystals
Posted on 5/28/25 at 6:28 am to rt3
Shocker
Posted on 5/28/25 at 6:40 am to rt3
quote:
Starship experienced a rapid unscheduled disassembly.
Posted on 5/28/25 at 8:29 am to rt3
Good topic! It seems every time there’s anything having to do with Elon an amazing amount of hateful ignorance spews forth much as a knee-jerk reaction unabashedly proclaiming look how stupid I am! And they don’t care that they appear to be absolute morons.
Interesting behavior.
Interesting behavior.
Posted on 5/28/25 at 9:22 am to wallowinit
I am waiting for good video of that Booster slamming the Gulf of America.
Posted on 5/28/25 at 9:26 am to el Gaucho
quote:
He builds his liberal cars that run off electricity to try to put us oilfield guys out of business but what does he use in his spaceship pet project? Good ol American gasoline
Starship uses liquid methane and liquid oxygen.
Posted on 5/28/25 at 9:56 am to DarthRebel
quote:
that Booster slamming the Gulf of America.
Didn’t happen. It rained down in little pieces.
Posted on 5/28/25 at 10:30 am to Btrtigerfan
quote:
Didn’t happen. It rained down in little pieces.
It was pretty close to water before RUD. Hopefully with all the 4K cameras out there, someone got it
Posted on 5/28/25 at 10:36 am to Galactic Inquisitor
quote:
At this point, NASA has a better success rate.
NASA is funding Starship, so I'd say their success is tied at the hip.
Posted on 5/28/25 at 10:37 am to DarthRebel
quote:
RUD
People actually, unironically use this dumbshit term?
Posted on 5/28/25 at 10:42 am to rt3
My daughter did the same thing when she turned 15
Posted on 5/28/25 at 11:03 am to ATrillionaire
I just don’t see Artemis III happening before 2030. I honestly don’t see Starship being certified for human flight until 2035 at least.
It’s a far more complex system than the capsule system we rely on today for safety and redundancy.
It’s a far more complex system than the capsule system we rely on today for safety and redundancy.
Posted on 5/28/25 at 11:07 am to wesfau
quote:
People actually, unironically use this dumbshit term?
Calm down killer, it is a funny term. People like you are why we cannot have nice things.
Posted on 5/28/25 at 11:16 am to jcaz
quote:
I just don’t see Artemis III happening before 2030. I honestly don’t see Starship being certified for human flight until 2035 at least.
They may look at getting Falcon Heavy up to speed for it. Right now the limitations, besides not being actually designed for this
, larger fairing/payload capacity and integration with orion capsule or improved dragon capsule. Upgrading payload/fairing is actually not that expensive or complex, the capsule is the issue. Orion is not designed to sit at top Falcon, so there would be some integration work. On the other side, Dragon is not designed for lunar duty. The general conclusion though it would be cheaper to modify Falcon for the task, than launch another SLS. Politics are holding us back, which is why SLS is even a thing. It should have been scrapped billions of $$$ ago.
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News