- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/26/15 at 7:57 pm to tgrbaitn08
From the Federal Trade Commission:
[link=(www.consumer.ftc.gov/articles/0055-buying-used-car#warranties)]LINK[/link]
quote:
Private sales usually are not covered by the "implied warranties" of state law. That means a private sale probably will be on an "as is" basis, unless your purchase agreement with the seller specifically states otherwise.
[link=(www.consumer.ftc.gov/articles/0055-buying-used-car#warranties)]LINK[/link]
Posted on 9/26/15 at 8:00 pm to mouton
Exactly, and every PSA I've ever done over the past 10 years, which have been a few hundred, all state no warranty, as is where is.
Posted on 9/26/15 at 8:19 pm to upgrayedd
Was the BOS executed before a Notary?
If so and it was witness by said Notary then he's screwed. Him signing the BOS nulls any claim he would have for lack of knowledge on his part. He signed and bought regardless of his ignorance.
If so and it was witness by said Notary then he's screwed. Him signing the BOS nulls any claim he would have for lack of knowledge on his part. He signed and bought regardless of his ignorance.
Posted on 9/26/15 at 8:59 pm to shoelessjoe
OP's story is sketchy. There is a reasonable expectation that you would know if your car was in running condition or not.
The OP's description of the buyer is also suspect. Why in the hell wouldn't you want to at least test drive it?
The OP's description of the buyer is also suspect. Why in the hell wouldn't you want to at least test drive it?
Posted on 9/26/15 at 9:03 pm to shoelessjoe
The WAFB Investigative Team and Cheryl Mercedes...
tell 'em we all said hello.
tell 'em we all said hello.
Posted on 9/26/15 at 11:06 pm to mouton
quote:
From the Federal Trade Commission:
Wasn't that the exact same language from the used car commissions site? Probably...maybe...sometimes shite.
Posted on 9/26/15 at 11:12 pm to tgrbaitn08
Just like every bill of sale or buyers guide or retail sales installment contract will have an as-is statement.
Just like contracts you see all the time that have invalid clauses.
Go look at your CG bill of sale. I think there is a big empty box where you can add any warranty language that you'd like.
Or...go to google scholar and read some louisiana cases. And argue with those judges.
Just like contracts you see all the time that have invalid clauses.
Go look at your CG bill of sale. I think there is a big empty box where you can add any warranty language that you'd like.
Or...go to google scholar and read some louisiana cases. And argue with those judges.
Posted on 9/26/15 at 11:19 pm to TSLG
Why does it say it then idiot?
Posted on 9/26/15 at 11:23 pm to mouton
Do you and Breaux hang out or something? You know the other guy that was made to look like an idiot in this thread yet refused to admit he was wrong.
Posted on 9/26/15 at 11:24 pm to mouton
The BOS was done by a notary. I hadnt driven the vehicle in quite sometime except about a week ago. I explained it to the buyer and it didnt seem to bother him. I contacted the notary after the call from buyer and he said it was as is. Not my problem.
Posted on 9/26/15 at 11:26 pm to TSLG
You're correct. That box is left blank for a reason. It's assumed the sale is "as is". The warranty, if any is offered, would be added in that box.
youre a 1st year law student aren't you.
youre a 1st year law student aren't you.
Posted on 9/26/15 at 11:28 pm to tgrbaitn08
His daddy is a judge dammit!!!!
Posted on 9/26/15 at 11:32 pm to shoelessjoe
quote:
contacted the notary after the call from buyer and he said it was as is. N
Surely you had some sort of as is/no warranty statement in the contract right??
Posted on 9/26/15 at 11:35 pm to mouton
First post on the second page said he called back and everything was fine. No way this thread is still on topic.
Posted on 9/26/15 at 11:37 pm to CaptainsWafer
Its not. Two people proven wrong that refuse to admit it.
Posted on 9/27/15 at 1:40 am to mouton
quote:
Two people proven wrong that refuse to admit it.
I absolutely agree with this statement.
Posted on 9/27/15 at 2:33 am to mouton
Mouton is a first year law student, hahahaha. The rite of Recission statute applies in this scenario since the sale was closed within the confinds within a domicile. Mouton you're a complete joke of a wannabe lawyer. GTFO of here dumbass.
Posted on 9/27/15 at 7:30 am to mouton
Are you not grasping that "usually" and "probably" do not equal "always?" Because it sure seems like you think they do.
Popular
Back to top


1





