Started By
Message

re: So im more convinced than ever that the govt allowed 9/11 to happen

Posted on 8/6/17 at 10:31 pm to
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
138920 posts
Posted on 8/6/17 at 10:31 pm to
quote:



Dude, you want to take down a building you rent it out.

That's why I own rental properties too. So I can take them down.
Posted by SuperSaint
Sorting Out OT BS Since '2007'
Member since Sep 2007
150344 posts
Posted on 8/6/17 at 10:32 pm to
quote:

You think our IC is really that dumb that they can't pull off this kind of operation?
have you been in a coma? How the frick you think all these people involved, happened to not be a #leaker? Not a single one. Not a single document.


Please stop, you're embarrassing yourself. I have to get out this thread it's so cringeworthy.

This post was edited on 8/6/17 at 10:37 pm
Posted by PearlJam
NotBeardEaves
Member since Aug 2014
13908 posts
Posted on 8/6/17 at 10:32 pm to
quote:

Keep believing the government line.

Jeb loves you for it
make sure you don't miss my comment about being a political loon.
Posted by dbeck
Member since Nov 2014
29454 posts
Posted on 8/6/17 at 10:32 pm to
I wonder how many steel beams were taken out when the plane initially hit. How many others were weakened mechanically by the structure of the airplane crashing through them?

Then burning jet fuel in a confined space heating up an already weakened structure. Jet fuel doesn't have to melt steel to weaken it substantially.
Posted by northshorebamaman
Mackinac Island
Member since Jul 2009
38339 posts
Posted on 8/6/17 at 10:33 pm to
quote:

You think our IC is really that dumb that they can't pull off this kind of operation?

Too dumb to pull off blowing up the WTC and keep quiet about it for over 15 years? Yes.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
140573 posts
Posted on 8/6/17 at 10:33 pm to
It's not from the internet.
Posted by saint tiger225
San Diego
Member since Jan 2011
49067 posts
Posted on 8/6/17 at 10:34 pm to
quote:

You think our IC is really that dumb that they can't pull off this kind of operation?


You really think that this could be kept a secret in today's world?

Also, like someone else said, the politicians probably would have outed someone already with the way politicians are now days. They would put it out there and try to bury the party that would be affiliated with it.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
140573 posts
Posted on 8/6/17 at 10:39 pm to
quote:

I wonder how many steel beams were taken out when the plane initially hit. How many others were weakened mechanically by the structure of the airplane crashing through them?



FAQ #9: WERE THE TWIN TOWERS DESIGNED TO WITHSTAND THE IMPACT OF THE AIRPLANES?

Yes. Airplane impact tests that were conducted during the design of the Twin Towers showed that the skyscrapers would withstand the impact of a Boeing 707, which has more energy upon impact than the 767 aircraft that crashed into the Twin Towers on 9/11. In the following years, lead WTC structural engineer John Skilling, WTC structural engineer Leslie Robertson and WTC construction manager Frank Demartini made statements that underscore that analysis. A more detailed answer is available here.
LINK

Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
140573 posts
Posted on 8/6/17 at 10:43 pm to
quote:

You really think that this could be kept a secret in today's world?


FAQ #12: WHERE ARE THE 9/11 WHISTLEBLOWERS?

Many of those who cannot accept the scientific evidence that refutes the official story of the collapse of the three WTC towers on 9/11/2001 argue, "If 9/11 was an inside operation, surely at least one whistleblower would have come forward by now. You couldn't keep something like that secret." While at first blush this argument might seem to be logical, closer examination shows that it makes no sense. Since scientific evidence has clearly shown that the official explanation for the destruction of the WTC skyscrapers cannot be true, the theory that the official story must be true because there have been "no 9/11 whistleblowers" is entirely specious. A more detailed answer is available here.

LINK
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
138920 posts
Posted on 8/6/17 at 11:04 pm to
I love these half truths that you people trot out as complete facts
quote:

Yes. Airplane impact tests that were conducted during the design of the Twin Towers showed that the skyscrapers would withstand the impact of a Boeing 707, which has more energy upon impact than the 767 aircraft that crashed into the Twin Towers on 9/11. In the following years, lead WTC structural engineer John Skilling, WTC structural engineer Leslie Robertson and WTC construction manager Frank Demartini made statements that underscore that analysis.

Withstanding impact isn't the only factor. It's also thousands of gallons of fuel as well as other flammable material.
Posted by northshorebamaman
Mackinac Island
Member since Jul 2009
38339 posts
Posted on 8/6/17 at 11:05 pm to
quote:

Since scientific evidence has clearly shown that the official explanation for the destruction of the WTC skyscrapers cannot be true, the theory that the official story must be true because there have been "no 9/11 whistleblowers" is entirely specious.

Can't argue with that airtight explanation.
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
138920 posts
Posted on 8/6/17 at 11:05 pm to
quote:

While at first blush this argument might seem to be logical, closer examination shows that it makes no sense. Since scientific evidence has clearly shown that the official explanation for the destruction of the WTC skyscrapers cannot be true, the theory that the official story must be true because there have been "no 9/11 whistleblowers" is entirely specious

That isn't even an answer
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134141 posts
Posted on 8/6/17 at 11:06 pm to
I'm just going to assume this thread has gone as expected
Posted by dbeck
Member since Nov 2014
29454 posts
Posted on 8/6/17 at 11:07 pm to
Ok I'm convinced now.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
140573 posts
Posted on 8/6/17 at 11:09 pm to
quote:

I love these half truths


And you are guilty of it. You just ignore WTC 7.

Seriously, I'd love to have a serious non ad hom discussion about 911 on science and physics topics. It just seems so difficult and I don't know why.

Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
140573 posts
Posted on 8/6/17 at 11:10 pm to
Click on the link and read the entire explanation.
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134141 posts
Posted on 8/6/17 at 11:12 pm to
U rite, Gumbo.

Don't let anyone tell you different.

Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
140573 posts
Posted on 8/6/17 at 11:14 pm to
Where would a whistleblower go?

Posted by GreatLakesTiger24
Member since May 2012
60664 posts
Posted on 8/6/17 at 11:14 pm to
The government took down WTC 7. Fact.
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
138920 posts
Posted on 8/6/17 at 11:17 pm to
quote:

And you are guilty of it. You just ignore WTC 7.

Nah
Jump to page
Page First 7 8 9 10 11 ... 25
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 9 of 25Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram