- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: So im more convinced than ever that the govt allowed 9/11 to happen
Posted on 8/8/17 at 3:39 pm to timbo
Posted on 8/8/17 at 3:39 pm to timbo
quote:
trying to tell me that multiple people in multiple agencies had a heads up that an attack that would kill 3,000+ people would happen and they just ignored it?
Please don't reproduce.
People have leaked it, but they are quickly silenced, die of just fade away.
There is video of dudes wandering around bldg 7 prior to it falling with federal agents in there, telling the filmmaker to leave...its easy to see the guys' faces, if you want to track them down and ask why fire fighters weren't in there, that would be a good conversation starter...
0
Posted on 8/8/17 at 3:45 pm to GumboPot
Those are the arrival of the S-Waves generated from the collapse of the buildings. You don't get S-Waves from explosions.
Here's a good LINK explaining why. It's exactly how we can tell when/if countries are testing nuclear bombs. The signature is completely different from earthquakes. In this case, the collapse of the building acts as an earthquake from the chaotic and non point source origin of the collapse itself.
ETA: I'm done guys, time for this geologist to get drunk as any good geologist does.
Here's a good LINK explaining why. It's exactly how we can tell when/if countries are testing nuclear bombs. The signature is completely different from earthquakes. In this case, the collapse of the building acts as an earthquake from the chaotic and non point source origin of the collapse itself.
ETA: I'm done guys, time for this geologist to get drunk as any good geologist does.
This post was edited on 8/8/17 at 3:47 pm
Posted on 8/8/17 at 3:52 pm to TheGasMan
quote:
I'm done guys, time for this geologist to get drunk as any good geologist does.
I still have questions though.
Do different types of explosives produce different type of wave forms on steel and concrete substrates?
TNT?
Plastics?
Nano-thermite?
Posted on 8/8/17 at 3:52 pm to TheGasMan
quote:
Those are the arrival of the S-Waves generated from the collapse of the buildings. You don't get S-Waves from explosions.
No its not. If that were true the waves would increase as the building fell.
quote:
I'm done guys, time for this geologist to get drunk as any good geologist does.
Go back to finding gas pockets and oil shale and leave the hard stuff to the experts that went to college for more than 4 years.
Posted on 8/8/17 at 3:54 pm to GumboPot
quote:
I still have questions though.
Do different types of explosives produce different type of wave forms on steel and concrete substrates?
TNT?
Plastics?
Nano-thermite?
This is grade 'A' shite right here boys. This is how you troll.Posted on 8/8/17 at 4:01 pm to GumboPot
quote:
I still have questions though.
Do different types of explosives produce different type of wave forms on steel and concrete substrates?
TNT?
Plastics?
Nano-thermite?
He doesnt know. I used to work with Western Geophysical and most of those so called geologist went to Poplarville MS trade school.
Posted on 8/8/17 at 4:05 pm to Placebeaux
quote:
Poplarville MS trade school.
I think you mean Pearl River Community College, located in Poplarville, MS.
This post was edited on 8/8/17 at 4:06 pm
Posted on 8/8/17 at 4:21 pm to GumboPot
quote:
I still have questions though.
Do different types of explosives produce different type of wave forms on steel and concrete substrates?
TNT?
Plastics?
Nano-thermite?
Not sure. Can you show me the full scale tests of nanothermite so we can compare the three?
Posted on 8/8/17 at 4:28 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
Not sure. Can you show me the full scale tests of nanothermite so we can compare the three?
That's what I'm asking for.
Posted on 8/8/17 at 4:28 pm to GumboPot
quote:
That's what I'm asking for.
So no full scale nanothermite tests exist.
Posted on 8/8/17 at 4:39 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
You said I'm trying to shut down a discussion because I'm calling bullshite. That's just false.
Up, you must be in on it all.. You are trying to shut down a discussion in which people who are reaching at air to find something to argue 9/11 was an inside job.
Posted on 8/8/17 at 4:44 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
So no full scale nanothermite tests exist.
There are lots of tests for different forms of nano-thermite explosives for different applications however I cannot find specific seismic test data for nano-thermite explosives.
This post was edited on 8/8/17 at 4:45 pm
Posted on 8/8/17 at 5:49 pm to GumboPot
quote:
There are lots of tests for different forms of nano-thermite explosives for different applications however I cannot find specific seismic test data for nano-thermite explosives.
Ok, well show me one where they use nanothermite to damage a steel beam like the ones found in the WTC
Posted on 8/8/17 at 6:37 pm to upgrayedd
Bump
ETA: truthers are still dumb af
ETA: truthers are still dumb af
This post was edited on 8/8/17 at 6:55 pm
Posted on 8/8/17 at 8:10 pm to TheGasMan
Sheeple still cant handle the truth.
Posted on 8/8/17 at 8:16 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
Ok, well show me one where they use nanothermite to damage a steel beam like the ones found in the WTC
Here is a 15 minute video of an engineer conducting experiments in his backyard cutting the same A36 W and tube beams used to construct the towers with homemade thermite (nowhere near the quality of military grade nanothermite....nanothermite has more power because more of it burns in a shorter period of time due to increased surface area). It's really worth the watch. He completely debunks the MSM and Mythbusters experiments and demonstrates how the beams could be cut with thermite simply using his homemade thermite not military grade nanothermite composite (found in the WTC dust).
FWIW I've never been interested in this debate until a couple of months ago. Prior to that I just bought the company line. That was good enough for me. A couple of months ago a friend of mine, a very well educated friend of mine that is a practicing surgeon with two doctorate degrees suggested I watch the documentary Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth.
There are so many unanswered questions.
Posted on 8/8/17 at 8:37 pm to Placebeaux
Physics professor provides explanation how 100 tons of thermite was brought into the buildings: LINK
Posted on 8/8/17 at 9:10 pm to GumboPot
quote:
nanothermite has more power because more of it burns in a shorter period of time due to increased surface area)
Ok, I want to see that test, not the regular thermite test. Where is the video for the nanothermite test?
Posted on 8/9/17 at 12:01 am to GumboPot
quote:
Analysis of the chemical composition of dust samples provides further evidence of aluminothermic arson. For example, dust samples contained particles with high levels of manganese, zinc, and barium. 6 Barium is a toxic metal used in a number of industrial processes, but unlikely to be present in significant quantities in an office building. It is, however, useful as a catalyst and accelerant of aluminothermic reactions. Zinc, barium and sulfur are all common in military thermites. 7
Manganese was used in steel, paint, batteries, and ceramics.
Barium? LINK? No mention of barium nitrate, right?
Finding aluminum oxide might have established a link, but that duddn't hsppen, did it? Both barium nitrate and aluminum oxide were not found. Both are unique to thermate and would have no reason for being found at the WTC except through the use of thermate. Yet no traces were found.....weird, huh?
Liar
Posted on 8/9/17 at 12:03 am to GumboPot
quote:
There are so many unanswered questions
Right, so rather than pursue answers you just make up bullshite that you want to believe. Why?
Page 22 of 25
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News