- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Smith Shooter's Lawyer "My Client Was Not The Aggressor"
Posted on 4/12/16 at 12:55 pm to Red Stick Tigress
Posted on 4/12/16 at 12:55 pm to Red Stick Tigress
quote:
Only Hayes had not yet arrived at the red light. He was 1/2 to an entire football field away, maybe farther. (I'm putting this into terms you might be able to grasp.)
well describe to me what you see in this picture.
0
Posted on 4/12/16 at 12:55 pm to lsupride87
quote:
From the way Chad made it sound, I thought we had a detailed witness account speaking of Hayes rage and animal behavior
do you not hear the witness detailing they get out and start freaking out on the guy and then start screaming to will "we want to fight you". Its pretty detailed.
Posted on 4/12/16 at 12:56 pm to tigerskin
quote:
We now know that it was because Smith had just done a hit and run on him. Not justifying shooting for that alone.
But you kind of are justifying it. Some of you motherfrickers need some Jesus.
Posted on 4/12/16 at 12:57 pm to tke857
quote:
quote:
Russell isn't broke
kind of getting side tracked here but:
Maybe he just doesn't want to pay the mortgage since he's not working for the Raiders organization.
Now back to "Smith Shooter's Lawyer 'My Client Was Not The Aggressor'"
Posted on 4/12/16 at 12:57 pm to lsupride87
Yeah that's the witness. Chad is just putting a little exaggeration into it and choosing not to emphasize the part about Smith announcing he had a gun first. Shocking, I know.
Posted on 4/12/16 at 12:58 pm to Artie Rome
The only thin the hit and run justifies is a possible reason to follow
The self defense claim will depend on the 20 seconds before the shooting
The self defense claim will depend on the 20 seconds before the shooting
Posted on 4/12/16 at 12:59 pm to Artie Rome
No I am justifying it when Smith announced he had a gun.
The argument will be that Smith had just done a hit and run and announced to Hayes he had a gun.
Hayes was threatened that this person who had just done a hit and run was a threat to shoot him with the gun he announced.
Shoot before being shot.
Jury decide
The argument will be that Smith had just done a hit and run and announced to Hayes he had a gun.
Hayes was threatened that this person who had just done a hit and run was a threat to shoot him with the gun he announced.
Shoot before being shot.
Jury decide
This post was edited on 4/12/16 at 1:04 pm
Posted on 4/12/16 at 1:01 pm to lsupride87
It only justifies the follow for some idiot with a gun and little to no insurance. I'm pulling over and calling USAA. Every time.
Everybody had something to prove. One dead and one in jail. For what? Pride?
Everybody had something to prove. One dead and one in jail. For what? Pride?
Posted on 4/12/16 at 1:01 pm to tigerskin
quote:
No I am justifying it when Smith announced he had a gun.
You want to not discuss why smith said this. That is most important basis of what this is depending on.
Posted on 4/12/16 at 1:01 pm to tigerskin
Announcing you have a gun warrants being shot to death?
Posted on 4/12/16 at 1:02 pm to TigerFred
Thank you Fred.
ETA:
Fred, am I going crazy? I can't find any video on page 46
ETA:
Fred, am I going crazy? I can't find any video on page 46
This post was edited on 4/12/16 at 1:06 pm
Posted on 4/12/16 at 1:03 pm to BRgetthenet
quote:
Announcing you have a gun warrants being shot to death?
If that announcement was coupled with a move to retrieve/draw said gun, then maybe.
Posted on 4/12/16 at 1:04 pm to JohnnyKilroy
They won't be able to prove that, even if he had a gun.
Posted on 4/12/16 at 1:05 pm to BRgetthenet
quote:In some cases, absolutely
Announcing you have a gun warrants being shot to death?
In some cases, absolutely not
Posted on 4/12/16 at 1:05 pm to BRgetthenet
quote:
Announcing you have a gun warrants being shot to death?
if you did this and went to get it. Absolutely, i would do the same
Posted on 4/12/16 at 1:05 pm to BRgetthenet
quote:
They won't be able to prove that, even if he had a gun.
Ok...
That doesn't change my statement.
Posted on 4/12/16 at 1:05 pm to tigerskin
quote:
Cardale's
Not his name.
quote:
Cardale pulled over like u normally would after a wreck
No, he didn't really pull over all the way; he was still blocking traffic behind him. He wasn't pulled over all the way to the parking meters.
Posted on 4/12/16 at 1:06 pm to Red Stick Tigress
Holy shite.
You and Chad need to go seek help.
You and Chad need to go seek help.
This post was edited on 4/12/16 at 1:07 pm
Posted on 4/12/16 at 1:06 pm to Red Stick Tigress
quote:
Red Stick Tigress
Do you acknowledge that Hayes stopped due to traffic between him and the intersection?
Page 50 of 108
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News