Started By
Message

re: Smith Shooter's Lawyer "My Client Was Not The Aggressor"

Posted on 4/11/16 at 10:59 pm to
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
176133 posts
Posted on 4/11/16 at 10:59 pm to
That was a wrong assumption based on fuller specifically failing to identify smith as the perp when directly asked. Relevance of this is pretty far down but I understand you're here to not say anything of meaning but do a lot of bitching
Posted by uptownsage
New Orleans
Member since Oct 2014
2156 posts
Posted on 4/11/16 at 10:59 pm to
No, Hayes is guilty because Chad says Brees says so. And Brees is also going to take over the NO District Attorneys office because all the hearsay is true if it comes out of Drew's mouth.
Posted by Tigerdew
The Garden District of Da' Parish
Member since Dec 2003
14918 posts
Posted on 4/11/16 at 10:59 pm to
quote:

don't think you know what a break check is.


I wouldn't call what Hayes did a break check but unless he was in traffic there was no reason to stop where he did. That's not a red light or intersection or anything. That's a good 200ft or so from the corner of Magazine and Felicity.
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
176133 posts
Posted on 4/11/16 at 10:59 pm to
Lsupride defending thugs one post at a time
Posted by 13SaintTiger
Isle of Capri
Member since Sep 2011
18371 posts
Posted on 4/11/16 at 11:00 pm to
quote:

really is quite bizarre, and it literally started as soon as it happened. Very odd.



I think he knows Hayes, which would explain it. I'm not saying anything is wrong with that but LE has been the main one 1)fighting to prove Hayes' innocence 2)keeping this thread going. I'm not sure I've seen LE in any other high profile murder or regular murder thread on here in quite some time.

LE if you know the dude I can understand where you are coming from, if you don't then you really are a strange person to care about this man's life so much.
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
84543 posts
Posted on 4/11/16 at 11:00 pm to
I wouldn't be shocked if the trial is moved from Orleans Parish.
This post was edited on 4/11/16 at 11:02 pm
Posted by SomethingLikeA
Member since Jul 2013
1222 posts
Posted on 4/11/16 at 11:00 pm to
Lol. So you have to wait until you see a gun and GIVE them the opportunity to kill you?

We don't know the sequence of events yet. But if you get in an altercation/aggressive argument, tell me you have a gun, turn to reach for said gun...I'm shooting. I feel like most people here shoot.

Why would you wait to see a gun rise to your face? It's likely too late. It's not like he said I have a gun and took off running to a car that was parked 2 blocks away. That would be totally different. He was feet away.


Had this been some random thug and a video is found showing thug telling a cop or another subject, i got a gun and turns to reach...boom cop/subject fires. 95% of this board would say justified, stupid games stupid prizes, dont do that in front of a cop etc.
This post was edited on 4/11/16 at 11:05 pm
Posted by Sofa King Crimson
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2008
4135 posts
Posted on 4/11/16 at 11:00 pm to
quote:

If Smith never actually got out his car then Hayes is screwed and guilty as sin


I think there are eyewitness accounts of both Hayes and Smith out of their cars arguing.
This post was edited on 4/11/16 at 11:01 pm
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
128017 posts
Posted on 4/11/16 at 11:01 pm to
quote:

I think if that is proven that helps Hayes


It doesn't in any appreciable way. It works against him.
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
176133 posts
Posted on 4/11/16 at 11:01 pm to
LE, you won't find much chatter from me until reports started coming out but go ahead and keep making shite up. I had a cc permit for years so I guess that makes me a scientist too
Posted by rt3
now in the piney woods of Pineville
Member since Apr 2011
146392 posts
Posted on 4/11/16 at 11:01 pm to
quote:

Actually a lawyer. He can't shoot a guy for opening a car door and getting in or leaning into it. There is no threat there. He has to see a gun see something that gives him a reasonable belief that his life is in danger.

What happened here does not appear to meet that standard.

so we're now assuming the defendant "got the drop" on Smith (pulled his gun out 1st)

even with an assumed verbal threat by Smith... he still didn't need to fire... the defendant is still in the offensive position and in the case of the shooting is still at fault
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
108528 posts
Posted on 4/11/16 at 11:01 pm to
You are such a dumbass. I am not defending anyone. If Smith didn't have a gun, then Hayes deserves to rot in hell

If Smith had a gun and was reaching for it, then this case will be interesting


Why is it so hard for you to wait and see more of the facts?
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
288472 posts
Posted on 4/11/16 at 11:01 pm to
quote:

. You are knighting so hard for this guy it's quite intriguing.



you blindly knighting for Smith is quite intriguing to me.

and I never said this video would be important in court. You, like Chad assumed wrong, and just tells me it is prob more important that what you are leading on. I just posted it, i didnt even make a comment on it other than he clearly hit him and ran.
Posted by Cosmo
glassman's guest house
Member since Oct 2003
129421 posts
Posted on 4/11/16 at 11:03 pm to
This is getting very interdasting.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
108528 posts
Posted on 4/11/16 at 11:03 pm to
I actually specifically said this video doesn't matter at all. The 20-30 seconds before the killing is the only thing truly important.
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
40296 posts
Posted on 4/11/16 at 11:03 pm to
What's funny to me is that farquad and bencoleman are in full #BLM mode and don't even realize it.
Posted by 13SaintTiger
Isle of Capri
Member since Sep 2011
18371 posts
Posted on 4/11/16 at 11:03 pm to
quote:

Im just not going to sit here and blindly defend Smith because he was Saint.


Well Smith isn't the one who needs the defense. The fact is he was shot and killed, he didn't shoot anyone and he didn't kill anyone. He was a beloved icon in New Orleans. No one is blindly defending him, just recognizing someone that meant something to the city was shot and killed.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
128017 posts
Posted on 4/11/16 at 11:03 pm to
Clearly hit him and ran? You're making up facts. I don't see any contact.
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
176133 posts
Posted on 4/11/16 at 11:04 pm to
Nah, you keep ignoring why will was reaching for gun
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
288472 posts
Posted on 4/11/16 at 11:05 pm to
quote:

Clearly hit him and ran? You're making up facts. I don't see any contact.



Hayes pulled off to the side of the road because ___________?
Jump to page
Page First 29 30 31 32 33 ... 108
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 31 of 108Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram