- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 5/30/25 at 10:31 am to jimmy the leg
quote:
So you are assuming her guilt? Is it because she is white?
No I’m not. I’m saying it doesn’t matter if she did or didn’t, she’s still not worth this headache.
And if I did assume that, would it be that far fetched to assume that an elderly southern white woman probably born in the segregated south, to parents that percentage wise likely were segregationist, to say something like that?
I wasn’t born yesterday but I do know a thing called history. I say that matter of factly, with no assessment of her character. I’m sure she was nice to her students and family and is well liked to those that love and know her.
Posted on 5/30/25 at 10:34 am to StrongSafety
Are you this quick to assume guilt when a POC “allegedly” commits a crime? Or is this just reserved for whites?
Posted on 5/30/25 at 10:36 am to imjustafatkid
quote:
People who regularly use a word are obviously not offended by that word.
Yes I know you walk around your own life using English speech without any care for tone, inflection, and pitch. As much as you want to normalize speech for everyone, the reality is things are perceived and heard differently depending on who says it.
If you took the same text I just wrote above and gave it to another poster, they wouldn’t get as many downvotes as I generally get. What do you think? Surely who says it has nothing to do with the reaction
Posted on 5/30/25 at 10:42 am to TexasTiger08
That’s not fair to ignore all the other aspect that she presumably may relate to.
So the answer is no I don’t harp on a superficial character and make a grand assumption. That’s reckless.
As I said, I consider a multitude of implications, time/place, history, demographics, politics (past and ungoing), gender, science socioeconomics, then make an assessment.
Is there an issue with that?
So the answer is no I don’t harp on a superficial character and make a grand assumption. That’s reckless.
As I said, I consider a multitude of implications, time/place, history, demographics, politics (past and ungoing), gender, science socioeconomics, then make an assessment.
Is there an issue with that?
Posted on 5/30/25 at 10:50 am to StrongSafety
I don't know the lady, but I know that this kind of thing happens all the time on FB, especially to old people. Bad actors just download your profile pics & create an account with your name. If you ever get a friend request from someone you're already friends with theres 99% chance that's what's happening.
Posted on 5/30/25 at 10:55 am to Shexter
Just a bit aggressive there Sheily, but you ain’t wrong.
Posted on 5/30/25 at 10:57 am to StrongSafety
You take all those things into account when viewing a case involving a person you’ve never met. Anything you uncover is second hand info or things that aren’t directly related to said person. Then, without speaking to the person involved, you form a judgement and post strong opinions.
Anyone with a brain would “wait and see”. As has been the case with countless hot topics on here, from Jussie to the Idaho murders, the ones speaking loudest at the beginning tend to be wrong.
Anyone with a brain would “wait and see”. As has been the case with countless hot topics on here, from Jussie to the Idaho murders, the ones speaking loudest at the beginning tend to be wrong.
Posted on 5/30/25 at 10:58 am to StrongSafety
quote:
No I’m not. I’m saying it doesn’t matter if she did or didn’t, she’s still not worth this headache.
So the truth doesn’t matter to you. Coward.
Posted on 5/30/25 at 10:59 am to StrongSafety
quote:
And if I did assume that, would it be that far fetched to assume that an elderly southern white woman probably born in the segregated south, to parents that percentage wise likely were segregationist, to say something like that?
In her position, with her experience…yes.
I’m glad you spelled out your views on white women though.
Posted on 5/30/25 at 11:02 am to Splackavellie
quote:
Yeah it was probably that chick that came in here claiming the band director said something but nobody would listen to her cause she couldn't provide any details. Prime suspect as the hacker.
Agreed
Posted on 5/30/25 at 11:02 am to jimmy the leg
Seven pages in this thread and there is a common theme.
You have two brainwashed idiots that have taken up probably four pages alone with insane posts just hoping and praying this woman wasn't hacked so they can get one "win" in their battle for social justice.
Why people on this board continue to respond to these to groomer idiots is beyond me.
Ignore them, force them to create an alter, and ignore that one too. They are both sociopaths that get off on destroying others over shite they both do on a daily basis. You can't coexist with them, nor will you ever change their minds. For the love of everything, ignore them. You are just feeding their sociopathy.
You have two brainwashed idiots that have taken up probably four pages alone with insane posts just hoping and praying this woman wasn't hacked so they can get one "win" in their battle for social justice.
Why people on this board continue to respond to these to groomer idiots is beyond me.
Ignore them, force them to create an alter, and ignore that one too. They are both sociopaths that get off on destroying others over shite they both do on a daily basis. You can't coexist with them, nor will you ever change their minds. For the love of everything, ignore them. You are just feeding their sociopathy.
Posted on 5/30/25 at 11:05 am to StrongSafety
quote:
And if I did assume that, would it be that far fetched to assume that an elderly southern white woman probably born in the segregated south, to parents that percentage wise likely were segregationist, to say something like that? I wasn’t born yesterday but I do know a thing called history. I say that matter of factly, with no assessment of her character. I’m sure she was nice to her students and family and is well liked to those that love and know her.
I assume we could go through her FB posting history and see if she has a history of these types of comments.
I mean, an elderly lady who grew up in the segregated south would have always acted like this right? Not just all of the sudden start saying the N word on Facebook.
Posted on 5/30/25 at 11:08 am to jimmy the leg
quote]In her position, with her experience…yes. I’m glad you spelled out your views on white women though.[/quote]
Why would you purposefully twist and lie about what I said and not think I’d notice? Is your comprehension that poor or are you naturally that deceitful.
Purposefully cutting out where I said she’s was likely a nice and kind later to those that knew her. Is lying that instinctual to you? Is the only way you can prove a point is to lie and distort? Seems pathological
Why would you purposefully twist and lie about what I said and not think I’d notice? Is your comprehension that poor or are you naturally that deceitful.
Purposefully cutting out where I said she’s was likely a nice and kind later to those that knew her. Is lying that instinctual to you? Is the only way you can prove a point is to lie and distort? Seems pathological
Posted on 5/30/25 at 11:09 am to StrongSafety
quote:
Yes I know you walk around your own life using English speech without any care for tone, inflection, and pitch. As much as you want to normalize speech for everyone, the reality is things are perceived and heard differently depending on who says it.
If you took the same text I just wrote above and gave it to another poster, they wouldn’t get as many downvotes as I generally get. What do you think? Surely who says it has nothing to do with the reaction
You are arguing against the basic fact that people who regularly use a word are obviously not offended by that word. Arguing against obvious and clear common sense is usually frowned upon.
Posted on 5/30/25 at 11:19 am to imjustafatkid
quote:
You are arguing against the basic fact that people who regularly use a word are obviously not offended by that word. Arguing against obvious and clear common sense is usually frowned upon.
You realize you are now on his level, right?
Like every other progressive I have ever know, this frick stick has contributed NOTHING positive to society. They are only around to agitate and destroy.
This woman has likely mentor and aided hundreds of kids like the ones these groomer SJW's claim they support. The odds of her doing this are slim to none, based on her history and based on what we know about Facebook and hacks.
Yet, here they are, hoping and praying this is real so they can get one white person's life ruined. That is all that this is about. It is about feeding his sociopathy and that's it. He isn't here to help anyone.
Posted on 5/30/25 at 11:22 am to StrongSafety
quote:
would it be that far fetched to assume that an elderly southern white woman probably born in the segregated south, to parents that percentage wise likely were segregationist, to say something like that?
So you're saying she was brought up with systemic racism. So not her fault right? Blame the system for her culture. Is that how this works?
Posted on 5/30/25 at 11:40 am to EZE Tiger Fan
quote:
You realize you are now on his level, right?
Good point.
The guy constantly contradicts himself through his posts. The examples are endless. He tries to disguise this by trying to come across as educated via a few fancy words here and there.
He’s either a troll, or just misguided and blind. It’s not that the views are different than the majority of this board, it’s that he refuses to acknowledge another viewpoint, regardless of supporting evidence, statistics, etc. He latches on to one or two things, uses it to drive a narrative that fits his views, and won’t budge. If those same elements are used against him later, he will deny and deflect.
The most plausible explanation is right in front of his face, but it doesn’t matter.
Posted on 5/30/25 at 11:44 am to Shexter
I disagree with her statements, but I respect her right to free speech.
Either you believe in free speech or you don’t. I do.
No violent threat made, so I don’t see the issue.
Does someone get fired because they used language another person doesn’t like? Slippery slope.
Either you believe in free speech or you don’t. I do.
No violent threat made, so I don’t see the issue.
Does someone get fired because they used language another person doesn’t like? Slippery slope.
Posted on 5/30/25 at 11:46 am to blueboxer1119
quote:
I disagree with her statements, but I respect her right to free speech.
She’s denying she made the post. That’s the central issue.
Page 7 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News