Started By
Message

re: Should colleges require student covid testing before semester?

Posted on 8/3/20 at 8:12 am to
Posted by Boston911
Lafayette
Member since Dec 2013
2601 posts
Posted on 8/3/20 at 8:12 am to
quote:

You saying that every kid that gets tested before moving in will be in contact with someone before they get their results?
what I’m saying is you can get tested on Day 1, but have been in contact with someone the day before, or the day of, come back as negative, and become symptomatic the next day. This makes testing prior to admission worth nothing.
Posted by SlidellCajun
Slidell la
Member since May 2019
16969 posts
Posted on 8/3/20 at 8:20 am to
quote:

what I’m saying is you can get tested on Day 1, but have been in contact with someone the day before, or the day of, come back as negative, and become symptomatic the next day. This makes testing prior to admission worth nothing.


Seriously?

Worth nothing? I still don’t understand. If, one week before the start, the kid gets a test and 5 days later they get their result as negative, you’d have to agree that the likelyhood that they caught covid within that 5 days is extremely remote right?

Also, don’t ignore the other side of this-
What if the test comes back positive. At least THAT kid is prevented from moving in and infecting others.
You’d agree with that right?
Posted by BluegrassBelle
RIP Hefty Lefty - 1981-2019
Member since Nov 2010
109037 posts
Posted on 8/3/20 at 8:23 am to
quote:

That would be a huge waste of time and money


Probably saves them more money then a lawsuit if a student catches it on campus (and you know someone will try to sue).

Doing the initial testing is solely to cover their asses and put the responsibility for avoiding COVID-19 on the student.
Posted by LSUJML
Central
Member since May 2008
56855 posts
Posted on 8/3/20 at 8:24 am to
Why?
Unless you force them into a bubble immediately after testing they can still get it
Posted by OldSouth
Folsom, LA
Member since Oct 2011
11032 posts
Posted on 8/3/20 at 8:30 am to
Take a deep breath and repeat after me: “we’re all going to get it”....”a VERY small number of us will die”....”the rest of us will go on with life”. Repeat.
Posted by SlidellCajun
Slidell la
Member since May 2019
16969 posts
Posted on 8/3/20 at 8:34 am to
If the test comes back positive before the semester starts, then the kid is not allowed to move in and/or attend classes in person.

Posted by tigafan4life
Member since Dec 2006
51121 posts
Posted on 8/3/20 at 8:39 am to
Well how do you know that one kid that tested negative for the first test wont get sick the next week with it? YOu would have to do daily testing to make sure only negatives were on campus.
Posted by bigpapamac
Mobile, AL
Member since Oct 2007
22611 posts
Posted on 8/3/20 at 8:41 am to
I don’t think it’ll do much good. Even if a student doesn’t have COVID when they arrive on campus, there’s no way to protect them from getting it when they go out to bars, parties, etc
Posted by Privateer 2007
Member since Jan 2020
7951 posts
Posted on 8/3/20 at 8:43 am to
quote:

lawsuit


This.
100%
Just to CYA.

It's all stupid. But, everything is dumb AF nowadays.
Posted by IAmNERD
Member since May 2017
24526 posts
Posted on 8/3/20 at 9:12 am to
quote:

They assigned move in dates and times so only one student in each dorm hallway can move in at a time (to eliminate contact between family and the other students)

I get the logic behind this, but how much longer is this going to take? I'm not familiar with ND dorms or anything, but I can just imagine some of the dorms I've seen at SEC schools it would take an extra 3 or 4 days minimum at some of these places.

Move in days at Auburn were a shite show at the dorms. I can't imagine only giving a student only 10-20 mins to move in.i know they aren't moving furniture, but still, seems like it could go sideways very easy.
Posted by SlidellCajun
Slidell la
Member since May 2019
16969 posts
Posted on 8/3/20 at 9:29 am to
quote:

I don’t think it’ll do much good. Even if a student doesn’t have COVID when they arrive on campus, there’s no way to protect them from getting it when they go out to bars, parties, etc


But again, there’s the other side of the issue- if a student tests positive before the semester starts, it will keep that student away and reduce the infection rate. That student won’t come in and potentially infect others.
If you look at a school with @30,000 kids, and assume a contraction rate of just 5% then you’re talking about weeding out 1,500 positive cases before the semester starts
Posted by hubreb
Member since Nov 2008
2166 posts
Posted on 8/3/20 at 9:36 am to
Zero reason to test kids before it starts / there will be huge out breaks of asymptomatic kids - they will reach herd immunity fast -- sharing bongs, vapes, joints, funnels -- will spread it quick week one
Posted by Privateer 2007
Member since Jan 2020
7951 posts
Posted on 8/3/20 at 9:40 am to
quote:

school of 30k kids

quote:

weed out 1500 cases


It's cute how you think testing before kids get on campus keeps COVID off it.

There are 20-30k ppl.
Over 100 infected at any given time. Probably between 500-1000. But, surely over 100.

4 million plus "cases". Infections could be 10x or more.
You are not doing shite by testing one time.

This testing is purely Security Theater.
This post was edited on 8/3/20 at 9:41 am
Posted by TBoy
Kalamazoo
Member since Dec 2007
29173 posts
Posted on 8/3/20 at 9:47 am to
quote:

I get the logic behind this, but how much longer is this going to take?


Move in started at 8:00 a.m. Saturday and will be going on for about nine days. Each move in slot is 90 minutes and there is a half hour between slots, so about every 2 hours someone can move into a block of rooms. Some two room setups have up to 4 students.
This post was edited on 8/3/20 at 9:53 am
Posted by TBoy
Kalamazoo
Member since Dec 2007
29173 posts
Posted on 8/3/20 at 9:52 am to
quote:

If you look at a school with @30,000 kids, and assume a contraction rate of just 5% then you’re talking about weeding out 1,500 positive cases before the semester starts


I don't see how any school of that size can pull it off safely. They will pretty much just have to accept that the virus will sweep through the student population. Only the small self-contained schools could even have a chance of pulling it off, and even then it's probably less than a 50% chance of containing infection.

A population is only as safe as its biggest knucklehead. College aged kids are knuckleheads at a rate above the general population.
Posted by Eighteen
Member since Dec 2006
37474 posts
Posted on 8/3/20 at 9:55 am to
quote:

Notre Dame sent self-administration test kits with overnight return shipping to every student. They assigned move in dates and times so only one student in each dorm hallway can move in at a time (to eliminate contact between family and the other students). A negative test is required for move in. It’s all timed so that the test results come back a few days before your move in slot.

They will retest the entire student population in like ten days.

Very expensive and this can only work at a small U With an enclosed campus like ND (fewer than 8,000 students).


what a waste of time and resources for very little (if any) benefit

this is "feel good" CYA for the 'wHy aReNt yOu dOiNg sOmEtHiNg" parents
This post was edited on 8/3/20 at 9:57 am
Posted by TBoy
Kalamazoo
Member since Dec 2007
29173 posts
Posted on 8/3/20 at 10:05 am to
quote:

what a waste of time and resources for very little (if any) benefit


I guess we will all see.
Posted by hubreb
Member since Nov 2008
2166 posts
Posted on 8/3/20 at 10:07 am to
quote:

I don't see how any school of that size can pull it off safely.


are you aware that the vast majority of 18-22 year olds who test positive are asymptomatic? excess death from COVID is minuscule / more are dieing from OD, suicide, car wrecks
Posted by TBoy
Kalamazoo
Member since Dec 2007
29173 posts
Posted on 8/3/20 at 10:27 am to
quote:

are you aware that the vast majority of 18-22 year olds who test positive are asymptomatic?


That's really not a good argument to make regarding viruses. We don't have any data on the long-term effect of this particular virus. What we do know, however, is that other viruses continue to live in our bodies for decades without producing symptoms, then re-emerge later in life.

For example, I had chicken pox as a child. I had a mild case. The symptoms went away. However, chicken pox continues to live inside of my body, symptom free. In a few years I will need regular shingles shots, because chicken pox re-emerges later in life as shingles. It's much better to have never had chicken pox, even if its initial presentation was mild. Other viruses stay inside of us our entire lives, for example, HPV (re-emerges as cancer), and herpes simplex.

Not giving a damn about getting or spreading a virus that on first appearance kills some people is a reckless attitude which has unknown consequences for everyone.
This post was edited on 8/3/20 at 10:29 am
Posted by yellowfin
Coastal Bar
Member since May 2006
99047 posts
Posted on 8/3/20 at 11:13 am to
quote:

f you look at a school with @30,000 kids, and assume a contraction rate of just 5% then you’re talking about weeding out 1,500 positive cases before the semester starts




Hopefully the positive rate is way higher than 5% with that age group
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram