- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Should colleges require student covid testing before semester?
Posted on 8/3/20 at 8:12 am to SlidellCajun
Posted on 8/3/20 at 8:12 am to SlidellCajun
quote:what I’m saying is you can get tested on Day 1, but have been in contact with someone the day before, or the day of, come back as negative, and become symptomatic the next day. This makes testing prior to admission worth nothing.
You saying that every kid that gets tested before moving in will be in contact with someone before they get their results?
Posted on 8/3/20 at 8:20 am to Boston911
quote:
what I’m saying is you can get tested on Day 1, but have been in contact with someone the day before, or the day of, come back as negative, and become symptomatic the next day. This makes testing prior to admission worth nothing.
Seriously?
Worth nothing? I still don’t understand. If, one week before the start, the kid gets a test and 5 days later they get their result as negative, you’d have to agree that the likelyhood that they caught covid within that 5 days is extremely remote right?
Also, don’t ignore the other side of this-
What if the test comes back positive. At least THAT kid is prevented from moving in and infecting others.
You’d agree with that right?
Posted on 8/3/20 at 8:23 am to yellowfin
quote:
That would be a huge waste of time and money
Probably saves them more money then a lawsuit if a student catches it on campus (and you know someone will try to sue).
Doing the initial testing is solely to cover their asses and put the responsibility for avoiding COVID-19 on the student.
Posted on 8/3/20 at 8:24 am to SlidellCajun
Why?
Unless you force them into a bubble immediately after testing they can still get it
Unless you force them into a bubble immediately after testing they can still get it
Posted on 8/3/20 at 8:30 am to SlidellCajun
Take a deep breath and repeat after me: “we’re all going to get it”....”a VERY small number of us will die”....”the rest of us will go on with life”. Repeat.
Posted on 8/3/20 at 8:34 am to LSUJML
If the test comes back positive before the semester starts, then the kid is not allowed to move in and/or attend classes in person.
Posted on 8/3/20 at 8:39 am to SlidellCajun
Well how do you know that one kid that tested negative for the first test wont get sick the next week with it? YOu would have to do daily testing to make sure only negatives were on campus.
Posted on 8/3/20 at 8:41 am to SlidellCajun
I don’t think it’ll do much good. Even if a student doesn’t have COVID when they arrive on campus, there’s no way to protect them from getting it when they go out to bars, parties, etc
Posted on 8/3/20 at 8:43 am to BluegrassBelle
quote:
lawsuit
This.
100%
Just to CYA.
It's all stupid. But, everything is dumb AF nowadays.
Posted on 8/3/20 at 9:12 am to TBoy
quote:
They assigned move in dates and times so only one student in each dorm hallway can move in at a time (to eliminate contact between family and the other students)
I get the logic behind this, but how much longer is this going to take? I'm not familiar with ND dorms or anything, but I can just imagine some of the dorms I've seen at SEC schools it would take an extra 3 or 4 days minimum at some of these places.
Move in days at Auburn were a shite show at the dorms. I can't imagine only giving a student only 10-20 mins to move in.i know they aren't moving furniture, but still, seems like it could go sideways very easy.
Posted on 8/3/20 at 9:29 am to bigpapamac
quote:
I don’t think it’ll do much good. Even if a student doesn’t have COVID when they arrive on campus, there’s no way to protect them from getting it when they go out to bars, parties, etc
But again, there’s the other side of the issue- if a student tests positive before the semester starts, it will keep that student away and reduce the infection rate. That student won’t come in and potentially infect others.
If you look at a school with @30,000 kids, and assume a contraction rate of just 5% then you’re talking about weeding out 1,500 positive cases before the semester starts
Posted on 8/3/20 at 9:36 am to SlidellCajun
Zero reason to test kids before it starts / there will be huge out breaks of asymptomatic kids - they will reach herd immunity fast -- sharing bongs, vapes, joints, funnels -- will spread it quick week one
Posted on 8/3/20 at 9:40 am to SlidellCajun
quote:
school of 30k kids
quote:
weed out 1500 cases
It's cute how you think testing before kids get on campus keeps COVID off it.
There are 20-30k ppl.
Over 100 infected at any given time. Probably between 500-1000. But, surely over 100.
4 million plus "cases". Infections could be 10x or more.
You are not doing shite by testing one time.
This testing is purely Security Theater.
This post was edited on 8/3/20 at 9:41 am
Posted on 8/3/20 at 9:47 am to IAmNERD
quote:
I get the logic behind this, but how much longer is this going to take?
Move in started at 8:00 a.m. Saturday and will be going on for about nine days. Each move in slot is 90 minutes and there is a half hour between slots, so about every 2 hours someone can move into a block of rooms. Some two room setups have up to 4 students.
This post was edited on 8/3/20 at 9:53 am
Posted on 8/3/20 at 9:52 am to SlidellCajun
quote:
If you look at a school with @30,000 kids, and assume a contraction rate of just 5% then you’re talking about weeding out 1,500 positive cases before the semester starts
I don't see how any school of that size can pull it off safely. They will pretty much just have to accept that the virus will sweep through the student population. Only the small self-contained schools could even have a chance of pulling it off, and even then it's probably less than a 50% chance of containing infection.
A population is only as safe as its biggest knucklehead. College aged kids are knuckleheads at a rate above the general population.
Posted on 8/3/20 at 9:55 am to TBoy
quote:
Notre Dame sent self-administration test kits with overnight return shipping to every student. They assigned move in dates and times so only one student in each dorm hallway can move in at a time (to eliminate contact between family and the other students). A negative test is required for move in. It’s all timed so that the test results come back a few days before your move in slot.
They will retest the entire student population in like ten days.
Very expensive and this can only work at a small U With an enclosed campus like ND (fewer than 8,000 students).
what a waste of time and resources for very little (if any) benefit
this is "feel good" CYA for the 'wHy aReNt yOu dOiNg sOmEtHiNg" parents
This post was edited on 8/3/20 at 9:57 am
Posted on 8/3/20 at 10:05 am to Eighteen
quote:
what a waste of time and resources for very little (if any) benefit
I guess we will all see.
Posted on 8/3/20 at 10:07 am to TBoy
quote:
I don't see how any school of that size can pull it off safely.
are you aware that the vast majority of 18-22 year olds who test positive are asymptomatic? excess death from COVID is minuscule / more are dieing from OD, suicide, car wrecks
Posted on 8/3/20 at 10:27 am to hubreb
quote:
are you aware that the vast majority of 18-22 year olds who test positive are asymptomatic?
That's really not a good argument to make regarding viruses. We don't have any data on the long-term effect of this particular virus. What we do know, however, is that other viruses continue to live in our bodies for decades without producing symptoms, then re-emerge later in life.
For example, I had chicken pox as a child. I had a mild case. The symptoms went away. However, chicken pox continues to live inside of my body, symptom free. In a few years I will need regular shingles shots, because chicken pox re-emerges later in life as shingles. It's much better to have never had chicken pox, even if its initial presentation was mild. Other viruses stay inside of us our entire lives, for example, HPV (re-emerges as cancer), and herpes simplex.
Not giving a damn about getting or spreading a virus that on first appearance kills some people is a reckless attitude which has unknown consequences for everyone.
This post was edited on 8/3/20 at 10:29 am
Posted on 8/3/20 at 11:13 am to SlidellCajun
quote:
f you look at a school with @30,000 kids, and assume a contraction rate of just 5% then you’re talking about weeding out 1,500 positive cases before the semester starts
Hopefully the positive rate is way higher than 5% with that age group
Popular
Back to top



1





